Do Lulu Movements in Italy Fight Mafia and Corruption? Framing processes and 'anti-system' struggles in the No Tav, No Bridge and No Muos case studies


Abstract


In this article, we focus on the way in which the LULU (Locally Unwanted Land Use) movements against great infrastructures have framed the issues of corruption and organized crime in Italy, with particular reference to the mafia system, and the struggle against them. Even though they may seem minor issues, they are present in many territorial struggles, from North to South: indeed, we have chosen to analyse – using documents and semi-structured interviews with key informants – as empirical cases the No Tav, No Bridge and No Muos movements. Considering the frame analysis of the activists we have found the same mechanisms of frame bridging, which connect corruption and mafia with other issues in the movements, and frame extension from the particular cases to the general issues. Moreover, the corrupt and mafia systems outlined by the Lulu activists merge into a unique "corrupt-mafia system" that produces unwanted public works. Indeed, we have defined the Lulu movements as territorial movements carrying on 'anti-system' struggles, because, while contrasting specific large-scale infrastructures and military bases, they struggle against the system that have created them and to which they belong.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v10i3p747

Keywords: corruption; mafia; lulu movements; great infrastructures; Italy

References


Beyerle S. (2014), Curtailing Corruption: People Power for Accountability and Justice, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Caruso L. (2010), Il territorio della politica. La nuova partecipazione di massa nei movimenti. No Tav e No Dal Molin, Milano, Franco Angeli.

della Porta D. (ed. 2004), Comitati di cittadini e democrazia urbana, Soveria Mannelli, Rubbettino.

della Porta D., and M. Diani (2006), Social Movements: An Introduction,2nd edition, Oxford, Blackwell.

della Porta D., M. Fabbri, and G. Piazza (2013), “PuttingProtest in Place. Contested and Liberated Spaces in Three Campaigns”, in W.

Nicholls, B. Miller, and J. Beaumont (eds.), Spaces of Contention: Spatialities and Social Movements, Farnham, Ashgate, pp. 27-46.

della Porta D., L. Mosca and L. Parks (2014), “2011: a year of protest on social justice in

Italy”, in Subterranean Politics in Europe. Palgrave MacMillan.

della Porta D. and A. Vannucci (1999), Corrupt Exchanges: Actors, Resources, and Mechanisms of Political Corruption. London, Routledge.

della Porta D. and A. Vannucci (2007), Mani impunite. Vecchia e nuova corruzione in Italia, Roma-Bari, Laterza.

della Porta D., and G. Piazza (2007), “Local Contention, Global Framing: The Protest Campaigns against the TAV in Val di Susa and the Bridge on the Messina Straits”, Environmental Politics, 16(5): 864-882.

della Porta D., and G. Piazza (2008a), Le ragioni del no. Le campagne contro la Tav in Val di Susa e il Ponte sullo Stretto, Milano, Feltrinelli.

della Porta D., and G. Piazza (2008b), Voices of the Valley, Voices of the Straits. How ProtestCreatesCommunities, Oxford/New York, Berghahn Books.

della Porta D., and G. Piazza (2016), “Il cambiamento di scala del Movimento No MUOS: oltre la protesta contro l’inquinamento elettromagnetico”, StrumentiRes. Rivista online della Fondazione RES, VIII(2): 1-28.

Fedi A. and T. Mannarini (eds. 2008), Oltre il Nimby. La dimensione psico-sociale della protesta contro le opere sgradite, Milano, Franco Angeli.

Latouche S. (2007),Petit traité de la décroissance sereine, Paris, 1001 Nuits.Mangano. A, Apertura dei lavori. I No Ponte occupano il cantiere, Revised 14 June 2010, (https://www.terrelibere.org/4016-apertura-dei-lavori-i-no-ponte-occupano-il-cantiere/2010).

Mazzeo A. (2010), I Padrini del Ponte. Affari di mafia sullo stretto di Messina, Roma, Edizioni Alegre.

Mazzeo A. (2013), Il MUOStro di Niscemi. Per le guerre globali del XXI secolo, Firenze, Editpress.

Piazza G. (2011), “Locally unwanted land use’ movements: the role of left-wing parties and groups in trans-territorial conflicts in Italy”, Modern Italy, 16(3): 329-344.

Schneider J.C. and P.T. Schneider (2003), Reversible Destiny. Mafia, Antimafia and the Struggle for Palermo, Berkeley-Los Angeles, California University Press.

Snow D.A., B.E. Rochford, S. Worden, and R. Benford (1986), “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation”, American Sociological Review, 51: 464-81.

Sturniolo G. (ed. 2009), Ponte sullo Stretto e mucche da mungere. Grandi infrastrutture, servizi pubblici e bolle speculative, Messina, Terrelibere.org.

Tarrow, S. and D.McAdam (2005), “Scale Shift in Transnational Contention”, in D. della Porta and S. Tarrow (eds.), Transnational Protest and Global Activism, Lanham, Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 121-150.

Trom D. (1999), “De la réfutation de l’effet NIMBY considérée comme une pratique militante. Notes pour une approche pragmatique de l’activité revendicative“, Revue française de sciences politique, 49: 31-50.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.