The Cultural Outcomes of Social Movements: A Computational Linguistics Approach


Scholars have long established the importance of the cultural outcomes of social movements in the context of political power and representation. However, they have also acknowledged the methodo-logical difficulties associated with studying cultural outcomes, especially when culture is manifested through linguistic practices. This paper addresses the potential for dealing with movements and culture as mani-fested in symbols, public discourse, narratives, and rhetoric and makes two contributions: It links the social movement literature studying culture through language with Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques for systematic and comprehensive cultural analysis; and introduces a state-of the-art method which pro-vides a better understanding of language change and linguistic influence given the capacity of computa-tional analyses to process large volumes of data for multiple actors and varied data sources during long pe-riods of time. The paper describes the cultural influence of women organizations in Spain between 2000-2020 on issues such as gender inequalities, abortion, gender violence, prostitution, and surrogacy. Tweets and manifestos by women's organizations', as well as national press coverage of women issues and inter-ventions by MPs in the parliamentary arena, are used to describe the advantages and limitations of the method for the study of cultural outcomes. Computational linguistics provides new possibilities for scholarly research on cultural outcomes of social movements but also shows that these methods should be accompa-nied by precise definitions of cultural outcomes, detailed and replicable operationalisation processes, and theoretical models that identify the mechanisms that explain the linguistic phenomena that underly cultural change.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v14i3p1151

Keywords: Cultural outcomes; social movements; natural language processing; computational linguistics


Amenta, E. (2006). When Movements Matter. Princeton Studies in American Politics: Princeton University Press.

Babbie, E. R. (2012). The practice of social research. Cengage learning.

Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639.

Bosi, L., Giugni, M., & Uba, K. (2016). The consequences of social movements: Taking stock and looking forward. In The Consequences of Social Movements.

Bruner, J. (1991). The Narrative Construction of Reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21.

d’Anjou, L., & Van Male, J. (1998). Between Old and New: Social Movements and Cultural Change. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 3(2), 207–226.

Dahlerup, D. (2006). The Story of the Theory of Critical Mass. Politics & Gender, 2(04), 119–128.

Della Porta, D., & Pavan, E. (2018). The nexus between media, communication and social movementsLooking back and the way forward. In The Routledge companion to media and activism (pp. 29–37). Routledge.

Earl, J. (2007). The Cultural Consequences of Social Movements. The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, 2000, 508–530.

Eliaz, K., & Spiegler, R. (2020). A Model of Competing Narratives†. American Economic Review, 110(12), 3786–3816.

Ferree, M. M., Gerhards, M. J., Gamson, W. A., & Rucht, D. (2002). Shaping Abortion Discourse.

Fisher, K. (1997). Locating Frames in the Discursive Universe. Sociological Research Online, 2(3), 88–111.

Gamson, W. A., Croteau, D., Hoynes, W., & Sasson, T. (1992). Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18(1), 373–393.

Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.

Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1994). The changing culture of affirmative action. Equal Employment Opportunity: Labor Market Discrimination and Public Policy, 3, 373–394.

Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D. (1992). Mesomobilization. In American Journal of Sociology (Vol. 98, pp. 555–595).

Gilens, M., & Page, B. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(3), 564–581.

Hart, S. (1996). The cultural dimension of social movements: A theoretical reassessment and literature review. Sociology of Religion: A Quarterly Review, 57(1), 87–100.

Helman, S. (1999a). From Soldiering and Motherhood to Citizenship: A Study of Four Israeli Peace Protest Movements. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 6(3), 292–313.

Helman, S. (1999b). From Soldiering and Motherhood to Citizenship: A Study of Four Israeli Peace Protest Movements. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 6(3), 292–313.

Jackson, S. J., Bailey, M., & Welles, B. F. (2020). Women Tweet on Violence: From #YesAllWomen to #MeToo. In #HashtagActivism (Issue April 2021, pp. 1–30). The MIT Press.

Johnston, H., & Klandermans, B. (1995). Social movements and culture (H. Johnston & B. Klandermans (eds.); Social Mov). University of Minnesota Press.

Joseph, J. (2006). Language and Politics (Vol. 17, Issue 2). Edinburgh University Press.

Jung, W., King, B. G., & Soule, S. A. (2014). Issue bricolage: Explaining the configuration of the social movement sector, 1960–1995. American Journal of Sociology, 120(1), 187–225.

Kingdon, J. W., & Thurber, J. A. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (Vol. 45). Little, Brown Boston.

Klüver, H., & Mahoney, C. (2015). Measuring interest group framing strategies in public policy debates. Journal of Public Policy.

Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (1999). Political claims analysis: integrating protest event and political discourse approaches. Mobilization: An International Quarterly.

Krinsky, J., & Crossley, N. (2014). Social movements and social networks: Introduction. Social Movement Studies, 13(1), 1–21.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.

Lens, V. (2002). Public voices and public policy: Changing the societal discourse on welfare. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 29(1), 137–154.

Lippi, M., & Torroni, P. (2016). Argument mining from speech: Detecting claims in political debates. 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2016, 2979–2985.

Lorenzini, J., Kriesi, H., Makarov, P., & Wüest, B. (2021). Protest Event Analysis: Developing a Semiautomated NLP Approach. American Behavioral Scientist.

Lovenduski, J. (2005). Feminizing politics. Polity.

Luders, J. E. (2016). Feminist mobilization and the politics of rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Luker, K. (1984). Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood (Vol. 759). Univ of California Press.

Mazur, A. G. (2002). Theorizing feminist policy. OUP Oxford.

McCammon, H. (2009). Beyond frame resonance: The argumentative structure and persuasive capacity of twentieth-century US women’s jury-rights frames. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 14(1), 45–64.

Mendes, K. (2011). Feminism in the news: Representations of the women’s movement since the 1960s. Feminism in the News: Representations of the Women’s Movement Since the 1960s, 1–199.

Papanikolaou, K., & Papageorgiou, H. (2020). Protest Event Analysis: A Longitudinal Analysis for {G}reece. Proceedings of the Workshop on Automated Extraction of Socio-Political Events from News 2020, May, 57–62.

Pavan, E. (2020). Women’s Activism. The International Encyclopedia of Gender, Media, and Communication, 1–12.

Polletta, F. (1999). Snarls, Quacks, and Quarrels: Culture and Structure in Political Process Theory. Sociological Forum, 14(1), 63–70.

Polletta, F., Darnovsky, M., Epstein, B., Flacks, R., Johnston, H., & Klandermans, B. (1996). Social Movements and Culture. In Contemporary Sociology (Vol. 25, p. 483).

Rauh, C., De Wilde, P., & Schwalbach, J. (2017). The ParlSpeech data set: Annotated full-text vectors of 3.9 million plenary speeches in the key legislative chambers of seven European states (V1 ed.). Harvard Dataverse.

Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (1993). Problem definition, agenda access, and policy choice. Policy Studies Journal, 21(1), 56–71.

Sanfilippo, A., Franklin, L., Tratz, S., Danielson, G., Mileson, N., Riensche, R., & McGrath, L. (2008). Automating frame analysis. Social Computing, Behavioral Modeling, and Prediction, 2008, 239.

Sawer, M., Tremblay, M., & Trimble, L. (2006). Representing women in parliament: a comparative study. Routledge.

Sokal, R. R. (1958). A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ. Kansas, Sci. Bull., 38, 1409–1438.

Stetson, D. M., & Mazur, A. G. (2000). Women’s Movements and the State: Job-Training Policy in France and the U. S. Political Research Quarterly, 53(3), 597.

Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273.

Tahmasebi, N., Borin, L., & Jatowt, A. (2018). Survey of computational approaches to lexical semantic change detection. ArXiv.

Weldon, S. L. (2002). Beyond Bodies : Institutional Sources. November, 1153–1174.

Wijffels, J. (2019). Udpipe: Tokenization, parts of speech tagging, lemmatization and dependency parsing with the UDPipe NLP toolkit. R Package Version 0.8, 3.

Williams, R. H. (1995). Constructing the Public Good: Social Movements and Cultural Resources. Social Problems, 42(1), 124–144.

Woodly, D. R. (2015). The Politics of Common Sense: How Social Movements Use Public Discourse to Change Politics and Win Acceptance. The Politics of Common Sense: How Social Movements Use Public Discourse to Change Politics and Win Acceptance, 1–272.

Zdravomyslova, E. (1992). The role of Social movements in the creation of new political symbolism in Russia. First European Conference on Social Movements, Berlin.

Zhang, Z., Wu, Y., Li, Z., & Zhao, H. (2018). I Know What You Want: Semantic Learning for Text Comprehension. Proceedings of the 33rd Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, PACLIC 2019, 298–308.

Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.