Excluding Emotions: The Performative Function of Populism


Abstract


Populists are often excluded from political life on the basis that they are too emotional. Both social movements as well as political parties who are labelled as populist are accused of using demagoguery and manipulation in order to attract support and new membership. Often, these critiques emanate from the political establishment, creating a division between emotional and rational actors in politics. In this article, I argue that instead of seeing populism as a nominal or ordinal category, we should look at how the term itself has performative properties. The article is interested in how populism as a concept is used as a tool for exclusion, and how being ‘too emotional’ is used as justification for excluding certain actors. This article first contends that this perspective is endemic to political and social theory, and has long been utilised to marginalise women, non-Europeans, or young people. Second, the article demonstrates how this perspective also pervades much of contemporary studies on populism, which do not sufficiently recognise the political implications of employing a strict divide between emotion and reason. Third, the article further contends that by using a Laclauian framework which sees politics as equal to hegemony as equal to populism, one can conclude that populist actors are no different from other political actors; emotions and affects are always central to any political identity. Instead, the division between emotional and rational in politics serves to sediments exclusionary practices against newcomers and challengers of the status quo. I conclude by using the Laclauian framework, focus can be turned to the performative function of populism, and its political implications.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v13i1p107

Keywords: populism; emotions; exclusion; politics of emotions; political theory; Laclau

References


Almond, G. and S. Verba (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Aminzade, R., and D., MacAdam. (2002). “Emotions and Contentious Politics”, Mobiliza-tion, 7(2): 107–109. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.7.2.64060k7663m686r7

Arditi, B. (2010). “Review Essay: Populism is Hegemony is Politics? On Ernesto Laclau’s On Populist Reason”, Constellations, 17(3): 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2010.00587.x

BBC News (2012), "EU leader Van Rompuy sees 'populist' threat to Schengen", April 25, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17837098, Accessed December 12, 2017.

Bentham, J. (1995). A fragment on government. Charlottesville, VA.: Interlex Corporation.

Berlant, L. (2006), “Cruel Optimism”, Differences, 17 (3): 20-36.

Breeze, R. (2019). “Emotion in politics: Affective-discursive practices in UKIP and La-bour”, Discourse and Society, 30(1): 24–43.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518801074

Canovan, M. (2005). The People. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Clarke, S., P. Hoggett and S. Thompson (eds.) (2006), Emotion, Politics, and Society, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Converse, P. (1970 [1963]), “Attitudes and Non-Attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue”, in: E. Tufte (ed.), The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems, London: Addison-Wesley, pp. 153-184.

Cossarini, P. and F. Vallespín (eds.) (2019), Populism and Passions: Democratic Legitimacy After Austerity, London: Routledge.

Dean, J., B. Maiguashca, and D.I.N. Ore (2020). “Did somebody say populism? Towards a renewal and reorientation of populism studies”, Journal of Political Ideologies, 25(1): 11–27.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2020.1699712

De Cleen, B., J. Glynos and A. Mondon (2018), “Critical Research on Populism: Nine Rules of Engagement”, Organization, 23 (5): 649-661.

Devenney, M. (2020). Towards an improper politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Eze, E. C. (1995). “The Color of Reason: The Idea of ‘Race’ in Kant’s Anthropology”, The Bucknell Review, 38(2): 200–241.

Eze, E. C. (1997). Race and the Enlightenment: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.

Ferree, Myra Marx (1992), “The Political Context of Rationality: Rational Choice Theory and Resource Mobilization”, in A.Morris and C. McClurg Mueller (eds.), Frontiers in So-cial Movement Theory, New Haven: Yale, pp. 29-52.

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The birth of the prison. London: Allen Lane.

Freeden, M. (1996). Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Ox-ford University Press.

Galston, W. A. (2018). Anti-Pluralism: The Populist Threat to Liberal Democracy. Yale Uni-versity Press.

Gerbaudo, P., and F. Screti (2017). “Reclaiming popular sovereignty: The vision of the state in the discourse of Podemos and the Movimento 5 Stelle”, Javnost, 24(4): 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2017.1330089

Glynos, J., and A. Mondon (2019). “The political logic of populist hype: The case of right-wing populism’s ‘meteoric rise’ and its relation to the status quo”, in P. Cossarini and F. Vallespín (Eds.), Populism and Passions: Democratic legitimacy after austerity. Lon-don: Routledge.

Glynos, J. (2012), “Body, Discourse, and the Turn to Matter”, in S. Bahun and D. Radu-nović (eds.), Language, Ideology and the Human: New Interventions, Farnham: Ash-gate, pp. 173-192.

Goodwin, J., J. Jasper and F. Polletta (2000). “The Return of The Repressed: The Fall and Rise of Emotions in Social Movement Theory”, Mobilization: An International Journal, 5(1): 66–83.

Goodwin, J., J. Jasper and F. Polletta (2005). Emotions and Social Movements. Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions (Vol. 31). https://doi.org/10.2307/3089970

Gould, D. B. (2009), Moving Politics: Emotion and ACT UP’s Fight against AIDS, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Gregg, M. and G. Seigworth (eds.) (2013), The Affect Theory Reader, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Habermas, J. (1984), Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Boston: Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. (1996), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Oxford: Polity Press.

Held, D. (1987), Models of Democracy, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Hobbes, T. (1991). Leviathan. (R. Tuck, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ignatieff, M. (1978). A just measure of pain. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Jasper, J. M. (1998). “The emotions of protest: Affective and reactive emotions in and around social movements”, Sociological Forum, 13(3): 397–424. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022175308081

Kant, I. (1960). Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime, trans. John T. Goldthwait. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Karp, J., A. Nai and P. Norris (2017), "Why cognitive skills strengthen perceptions of elec-toral integrity", MPSA annual conference, Chicago 6 April 2017. https://www.electoralintegrityproject.com/research-papers/, Accessed December 12, 2017.

Katsambekis, G., and A. Kioupkiolis (2019). “Introduction”. In G. Katsambekis and A. Kioupkolis (eds.), The Populist Radical Left in Europe. London: Routledge, pp. 1-20.

Katsambekis, G., and Y. Stavrakakis (2017). “Revisiting the nationalism/populism Nexus: Lessons from the Greek case”, Javnost, 24(4): 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2017.1330087

Kingston, R. and L. Ferry (eds.) (2008), Bringing the Passions Back in: the Emotions in Polit-ical Philosophy, Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

Kioupkiolis, A. (2016). “Podemos: the ambiguous promises of left-wing populism in con-temporary Spain”, Journal of Political Ideologies, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2016.1150136

Lacan, J. (1964), The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, trans. A. Sheridan, London: Routledge.

Lacan, J. (1966), Ecrits: the Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic Desire in the Freudian Unconscious, New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.

Laclau, E. (1990), New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time, London: Verso.

Laclau, E. (1996), Emancipation(s), London: Verso.

Laclau, E. (2005), On Populist Reason, London: Verso.

Laclau, E. and C. Mouffe (2001 [1985]), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Rad-ical Democratic Politics, London: Verso.

Le Bon, G. (1960). The Crowd. New York: Viking Press.

Locke, J. (1988). Two treatises of government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Maiguashca, B. (2019). “Resisting the ‘populist hype’: a feminist critique of a globalising concept”, Review of International Studies, 45(5): 768–785.

Markou, G. (2017). “The Rise of Inclusionary Populism in Europe: The Case of SYRIZA”, Contemporary Southeastern Europe, 4(1): 54–71.

Massumi, B. (1995). “The Autonomy of Affect”, Cultural Critique, 31: 83.

Medearis, J. (1997), “Schumpeter, the New Deal, and Democracy”, American Political Science Review, 91 (4): 819-832.

Michels, R. (1959), Political Parties: a Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy, New York, NY: Dover Publications.

Mill, J. (1937). Essay on Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mills, C. W. (1999). The Racial Contract. Women’s Philosophy Review. New York: Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.5840/wpr1999219

Moffitt, B. (2016). The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Repre-sentation. Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press.

Mouffe, C. (2018a). For a Left Populism. London: Verso.

Mouffe, C. (2018b). “Populists are on the rise but this can be a moment for progressives too”, The Guardian, 2–3.

Mudde, C. (2004). “The Populist Zeitgeist”, Government and Opposition, 39(4): 541–563.

Mudde, C. (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer-sity Press.

Mudde, C., and C. Rovira Kaltwasser (2012). “Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America”, Government and Opposition, 48(2): 147–174.

Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is Populism? Philadelphia, PA.: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Norris, P., and R. Inglehart (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ostiguy, P. (2017). “Populism: A Socio-Cultural Approach”. In C. R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo and P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook on Populism, Oxford: Ox-ford University Press, pp. 73-97.

Pareto, V. (1935), The Mind and Society, trans. Andrew Bongiomo, New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co..

Perugorría, I., & Tejerina, B. (2013). Politics of the encounter: Cognition, emotions, and networks in the Spanish 15M. Current Sociology, 61(4), 424–442.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113479743

Plamenatz, J. (1963). Man and society : a critical examination of some important social and political theories from Machiavelli to Marx. Longmans.

Romanos, E. (2014). “Emotions, Moral Batteries and High-Risk Activism: Understanding the Emotional Practices of the Spanish Anarchists under Franco’s Dictatorship”, Con-temporary European History, 23(4): 545–564.

https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0960777314000319

Rousseau, J.-J. (1984). Discourse on the Origins and Foundation of Inequality Among Men, trans. Maurice Cranston. London: Penguin Press.

Salmela, M., and C. von Scheve (2017). “Emotional roots of right-wing political popu-lism”, Social Science Information, 56(4): 567–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018417734419

Scheff, T. J. (1988). “Shame and Conformity: the Deference- Emotion System”, American Sociological Review, 53(3): 395–406. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095647

Schumpeter, J. (1976 [1942]), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London: Allen and Unwin.

Skonieczny, A. (2018). “Emotions and Political Narratives: Populism, Trump and Trade”, Politics and Governance, 6(4): 62. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i4.1574

Smelser, N. J. (1968), Essays in Sociological Explanation, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Stavrakakis, Y., A. Kioupkiolis, G. Katsambekis, N. Nikisianis and T. Siomos (2016). “Con-temporary Left-wing Populism in Latin America: Leadership, Horizontalism, and Post-democracy in Chávez’s Venezuela”, Latin American Politics and Society, 58(3): 51–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2016.00318.x

Stavrakakis, Y., G. Katsambekis, A. Kioupkiolis, N. Nikisianis and T. Siomos (2018). “Popu-lism, anti-populism and crisis”, Contemporary Political Theory, 17(1): 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-017-0142-y

Stavrakakis, Y. (1999), Lacan and the Political, Abingdon: Routledge.

Stavrakakis, Y. (2007), The Lacanian Left: Psychoanalysis, Theory, Politics, Albany: State University of New York Press.

Stavrakakis, Y. (2014). “The Return of ‘the People’: Populism and Anti-Populism in the Shadow of the European Crisis”, Constellations, 21(4): 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12127

Stavrakakis, Y. (2014), “Hegemony or Post-hegemony? Discourse, Representation and the Revenge(s) of the Real”, in A. Kiopkiolis and G. Katsembekis (eds.), Radical democ-racy and Collective Movements Today: The biopolitics of the multitude versus the He-gemony of the People, Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited, pp. 111-132.

Taylor, V. (1996), Rock-a-by Baby: Feminism, Self-Help, Postpartum Depression, New York: Routledge.

Williams, R. A. J. (1995). “Documents of barbarism: The contemporary legacy of Europe-an racism and colonialism in the narrative traditions of federal Indian law”. In R. Del-gado (Ed.), Critical Race Theory: The Cutting Edge. Philadelphia, PA.: Temple University Press.

Wirz, D. (2018). “Persuasion Through Emotion? An Experimental Test of the Emotion-Eliciting Nature of Populist Communication”. International Journal of Communication, 12(25). https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-149959

Young, I. (2001), “Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy”, Political Theory, 29 (5): 670-690.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.