آموزش وردپرس ساخت اپلیکیشن

Participation and Privatisation in Neoliberal Policies: The Case of Italian 'Piani di Zona'


Abstract


Nowadays, participation is a core issue in the broad field of social sciences. In the specific context of social policy, citizen participation is viewed as a key element of local welfare systems, and particularly for the planning activities that are linked to it. The institutional documents which formalise these activities-‘Piani di Zona’ (PdZ, local 3-year social plan)-contain discourses that strongly emphasise the role of ordinary citizens and third sector organisations. Yet, despite the intentions proclaimed within the texts of the Plans, the type of participation effectively promoted by these documents seems restricted to certain organisations of civil society-well-structured interest groups-rather than to the general citizenry. So the texts of the PdZ do not describe in a clear and plausible manner the procedures by which the involvement of ordinary citizens should be made possible. This article aims to demonstrate that this discrepancy be-tween the purposes declared within the PdZ and the means to be deployed is a catalyst for a process of privatisation of social policies. To this end, the article focuses on the PdZ as documents containing dis-courses, and analyses them through the lens of critical discourse studies (CDS)

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v9i2p414

Keywords: Local welfare; NeoliberalismVParticipationVPiani di ZonaVArea PlansVPrivatisation

References


Amoroso B., O. J. Olsen (1978), Lo stato imprenditore, Bari: Laterza.

Barnes M., J. Newman, and H. Sullivan (2007), Power, Participation and Political Renewal. Case Studies in Public Participation, Bristol: The Policy Press.

Barnett C. (2005), “The Consolations of ‘Neoliberalism’”, Geoforum, 36(1): 7-12.

Beaumont J., W. Nicholls (2008), “Plural Governance, Participation and Democracy in Cities. Introduction to a Symposium”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1): 87-94.

Bifulco L., L. Centemeri (2007), “La partecipazione nei Piani sociali di zona: geometrie variabili di governance locale”, Stato e mercato, 80: 221-44.

Bifulco L. (2008), “Politiche pubbliche e partecipazione. Alcune piste per la comparazione fra Italia e Francia”, Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 2:65-91.

Bifulco L. (2010), “Strumenti per la programmazione negoziale. I Piani sociali di zona e i Contratti di quartiere”, Rivista italiana di politiche pubbliche, 2: 31-57.

Bifulco L. (2015), “Welfare locale e città inclusiva: diversità, partecipazione, innovazione sociale”, Urban@it Background Papers, Rapporto sulle città 2015, retrieved December 31, 2015 (http://www.urbanit.it/wp-

content/uploads/2015/09/BP_A_Bifulco-2.pdf).

Blakeley G. (2010), “Governing Ourselves: Citizen Participation and Governance in Barcelona and Manchester”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(1): 130-45.

Blecher M., G. Bronzini, R. Ciccarelli, J. Hendry, and C. Joerges (eds. 2009), Governance, società civile e movimenti sociali. Rivendicare il comune, Roma: Ediesse.

Boas T. C., J. Gans- Morse (2009), “Neoliberalism: From New Liberal Philosophy to Anti-liberal Slogan”, Studies in Comparative International Development, 44(2): 137-161.

Bobbio L. (2007), Amministrare con i cittadini. Viaggio tra le pratiche di partecipazione in Italia, Torino: Dipartimento di Studi politici dell’Università di Torino.

Bozeman B. (2002), “Public-Value Failure: When Efficient Markets May Not Do”, Public Administration Review, 62(2): 145-61.

Brenner N., J. Peck, and N. Theodore (2010), “Variegated Neoliberalization: Geographies, Modalities, Pathways”, Global Networks, 10(2): 182-222.

Brenner N., J. Peck, and N. Theodore (2011), “Neoliberal Urbanism: Cities and the Rule of Markets”, in G. Bridge, and S. Watson (eds.), The New Blackwell Companion to the City, Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley, pp. 15-25.

Brenner N., N. Theodore (2002), “Cities and the Geographies of Actually Existing Neoliberalism”, Antipode, 34(3): 349-379.

Castel R. (1995), Les métamorphoses de la question sociale: une chronique du salariat, Paris: Gallimard.

Castel R. (2009), La montée des incertitudes: travail, protections, statut de l’individu, Paris: Seuil.

Castree N. (2006), “From Neoliberalism to Neoliberalisation: Consolations, Confusions, and Necessary Illusions”, Environment and Planning, 38(1): 1-6.

Cataldi L., E. Gargiulo (2011), “Partecipazione e programmazione sociale: i Tavoli tematici nei Piani di zona della Provincia di Torino”, Tafter Journal, 34.

Cerny P. (2008), “Neoliberalism and Place: Deconstructing and Reconstructing Borders” in A. Bas, H. van Houtum, and A. Lagendijk (eds.), State, Place, Governance: Shifts in Territoriality, Governmentality and Polity, Springer: Berlin.

Clarke (1999), “Making a difference? Markets and the reform of public services”, Paper to Anglo-German workshop on public reform, Berlin: Humboldt University.

Clarke J. (2004), “Dissolving the Public Realm? The Logics and Limits of Neo-Liberalism?”, Journal of Social Policy, 33(1): 27-48.

Clarke J. (2008), “Living with/in and without Neo-liberalism”, Focaal—European Journal of Anthropology, 51: 135-47.

Clarke J., J. Newman (1997), The Managerial State, London: Sage.

Clarke, J., S. Gewirtz, G. Hughes, and Humphrey, J. (2000), “Guarding the public interest? Auditing public services”, in J. Clarke, S. Gewirtz, and E. McLaughlin (eds.), New Managerialism, New Welfare?, London: Sage.

Collier S.J. (2012), “Neoliberalism as Big Leviathan, or…? A Response to Wacquant and Hilgers”, Social Anthropology, 20(2): 86-195.

Colombo D. (2013), Neoliberismo e stato sociale, Roma: Aracne.

Colombo D., E. Gargiulo (2013), “Tra partecipazione e privatizzazione: i discorsi della programmazione sociale in quattro grandi città italiane”, Sociologia e ricerca sociale, 101: 5-26.

Colombo D., M. Porcu (2014), “Néolibéralisme de province: un cas d’étude / Provincial neoliberalism: a case study», Justice Spatiale, 5, retrieved 31 December, 2015 (http://www.jssj.org/article/neoliberalisme-de-province-un-cas-detude/).

Cornwall A., K. Brock (2005), “What Do Buzzwords Do for Development Policy? A Critical Look at ‘Participation’, ‘Empowerment’ and ‘Poverty Reduction’”, Third World Quarterly, 26(7): 1043-60.

Crouch C. (2003), Postdemocrazia, Bari-Roma: Laterza, 2003.

d’Albergo E. (2010), “Governance, Participation and in-between. Inclusion in Policy Making and Policy for Inclusion in Four Western European Metropolises”, Pôle Sud, 32: 93-108.

d’Albergo E., G. Moini (2007), “Political Consequences of Participative Practices in an Urban Context: Two Case Studies in Rome”, Métropoles, 2, retrieved December 31, 2016 (http://metropoles.revues.org/492).

Dagnino E. (2006), “‘We All Have Rights but…’ Contesting Concepts of Citizenship in Brazil”, in N. Kabeer (ed.), Inclusive Citizenship: Meanings and Expressions, London: Zed Books, pp.149-63.

Dahl A., J. Soss (2014), “Neoliberalism for the Common Good? Public Value Governance and the Downsizing of Democracy”, Public Administration Review,74(4): 496-504.

Davies W. (2014), “Neoliberalism: A Bibliographic Review”, Theory, Culture & Society, 31(7/8): 309-317.

De Ambrogio U. (2004), “Il piano di zona”, in C. Gori (ed.), La riforma dei servizi sociali in Italia - L'attuazione della legge 328 e le sfide future, Roma: Carocci, pp. 99-115.

De Leonardis O. (2015), “Una questione d’inclusività”, Urban@it Background Papers, Rapporto sulle città 2015, retrieved December 31, 2015 (http://www.urbanit.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/BP_A_DeLeonardis.pdf).

Dean M. (1999), Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, London: Sage.

Dean M. (2002), “Powers of Life and Death beyond Governmentality”, Cultural Values, 6(1-2): 119-138.

Dean M. (2014), “Rethinking Neoliberalism”, Journal of Sociology, 50(2): 150- 163.

Della Porta D. (2008), “La partecipazione nelle istituzioni: concettualizzare gli esperimenti di democrazia deliberativa e partecipativa”, Partecipazione e Conflitto, 0: 15-42.

Dorf M.C, C.F. Sabel (1998), “A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism”, Columbia Law Review, 98(2): 267-473.

Eizaguirre S., M. Pradel, A. Terrones, X. Martinez-Celorrio, and M.

García (2012), Multilevel Governance and Social Cohesion, Urban

Studies, 4(9): 1999-2016

Fairclough N. L., R. Wodak (1997), “Critical discourse analysis”, in T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse Studies. A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Vol. 2. Discourse as Social Interaction, London: Sage, pp. 258-84.

Ferguson J. (2010), “The Uses of neoliberalism”, Antipode, 41(1): 166-184.

Fischer F. (2009), Democracy and Expertise: Reorienting Policy Inquiry, New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Frederickson H.G. (2005), “Whatever Happened To Public Administration? Governance, Governance Everywhere”, in Ferlie E., L.J. Lynn, and C. Pollitt, (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 282-302.

Fung A., E.O. Wright (2003), Deepening Democracy. Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance, London: Verso.

Gallino L. (2015), Il denaro, il debito e la doppia crisi, Torino: Einaudi.

Geddes M. (2014), “Neoliberalism and Local Governance: Radical Developments in Latin America”, Urban Studies, 51(15): 3147-3163.

Gramsci A. (1975) [1948], Gli intellettuali e l’organizzazione della cultura, Editori Riuniti: Torino.

Gualdani A. (2004), “La legge 328 dopo la riforma del Titolo V della Costituzione”, in Gori C. (ed.), La riforma dei servizi sociali in Italia - L'attuazione della legge 328 e le sfide future, Roma:

Carocci, pp. 43-52.

Guarneros-Meza V., M. Geddes (2010), “Local Governance and Participation under Neoliberalism: Comparative Perspectives”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(1): 115-129.

Harvey D. (1989), “From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism”, Geografiska Annaler, 71(B): 3-17.

Harvey D. (2005), A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Henman P., M. Fenger (eds. 2006), Administering Welfare Reform. International Transformations in Welfare Governance, Bristol: The Policy Press-University of Bristol.

Hermann C., J. Flecker (eds. 2012), Privatization of Public Services. Impacts for Employment, Working Conditions, and Service Quality in Europe, NewYork-London: Routledge.

Hilgers M. (2011), “The Three Anthropological Approaches to Neoliberalism”, International Social Science Journal, 61(202): 351-364.

Holden M. (2011), “Public Participation and Local Sustainability: Questioning a Common Agenda in Urban Governance”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(2): 312-29.

Holzinger K. (2011), “Negotiations in Public Policy Making: Exogenous Barriers to Successful Dispute Resolution”, Journal of Public Policy, 21(1): 71-96.

Jäger S. (2001), “Discourse and Knowledge: Theoretical and Methodological Aspects of a Critical Discourse and Dispositive Analysis”, in R. Wodak, M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Sage, pp. 32-63.

Jessop B. (2002), The Future of the Capitalist State, Cambridge: Polity.

Jessop B. (2013), “Putting Neoliberalism in Its Time and Place: A Response to the Debate”, Social Anthropology, 21(1): 65-74.

Jobert B., P. Muller (1987), L’Etat en action: politiques publiques et corporatismes, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Kipnis A. (2007), “Neoliberalism Reified: Suzhi Discourse and Tropes of Neoliberalism in the People’s Republic of China”, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 13(2): 383-400.

Le Galès P. (2011), Le retour des villes européennes, Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

Le Grand J. (1991), “Quasimarkets and Social Policy”, The Economic Journal, 101(408): 1256-1267.

Leal P.A. (2007), “Participation: The Ascendancy of a Buzzword in the Neo-Liberal”, Development in Practice, 17(4/5): 539-548.

Leys C. (2001), Market-driven Politics: Neoliberal Democracy and the Public Interest, London-New York: Verso.

Macpherson C.B. (1977), The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy, New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Marston G., C. McDonald (eds. 2006), Analysing Social Policy: A Governmental Approach, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Martin P. (2005), “Geographies of Neoliberalism in Latin America”, Environment and Planning A, 37(2): 191-201.

Mathur N. (2006), “Urban Revitalisation and Participatory Governance: Methodology for a Discursive Policy Analysis”, Policy and Society, 25(2): 77-108.

Mayer M. (2007), “Contesting the Neoliberalization of Urban Governance”, in H. Leitner, J. Peck, and E.S. Sheppard (eds.), Neoliberalism Urban Frontiers, New York-London: Guilford Press, pp. 90-115.

Melo M., G. Baiocchi (2006), “Deliberative Democracy and Local Governance: Towards a New Agenda”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(3): 587-600.

Miller P., N. Rose (1990), “Governing Economic Life”, Economy and Society, 19(1): 1-31.

Mirabile L. (2005), “Sulla «multiformità adattiva» del sistema (e i suoi rischi)”, in Id. (ed.), Italie sociali, Roma: Donzelli, pp.130-138.

Moini G. (2011a), “Le pratiche partecipative nel contesto delle politiche neoliberiste”, Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 1: 93-121.

Moini G. (2011b), “How Participation Has Become a Hegemonic Discursive Resource: Towards an Interpretivist Research Agenda”, Critical Policy Studies, 5(2): 149-168.

Moini G. (2012), Teoria critica della partecipazione. Un approccio sociologico, Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Moini G. (2015), “Capire il neoliberismo: variegatura, egemonia e (de)politicizzazione”, in Id. (ed.), Neoliberismi e azione pubblica. Il caso italiano, Roma: Ediesse, pp. 17-49.

Mouffe C. (1999), “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?”, Social Research, 66(3): 745-758.

Mouffe C. (2000), The Democratic Paradox, New York: Verso.

Mudge S. (2008), “What is Neo-liberalism?”, Socio-Economic Review, 6(4): 703-731.

Nadesan M.H. (2008), Governmentality, Biopower and Everyday Life, New York-London: Routledge.

Paci M. (ed. 2008), Welfare locale e democrazia partecipativa, Bologna: Il Mulino.

Papadopoulos Y., P. Warin (2007), “Are Innovative, Participatory and Deliberative Procedures in Policy Making Democratic and Effective?”, European Journal of Political Research, 46(4): 445-472.

Peck J. (2012), “Explaining (with) Neoliberalism”, Territory, Politics, Governance, 1(2): 132-157.

Peck J., A. Tickell (2002), “Neoliberalizing Space”, Antipode, 34(3): 380-404.

Peck J., A. Tickell (2007), “Conceptualising Neoliberalism, Thinking Thatcherism”, in H. Leitner, J. Peck, and E.S. Sheppard (eds.), Contesting Neoliberalism: Urban Frontiers, New York: Guilford Press, pp. 26-50

Pierson P. (2002), “Coping with Permanent Austerity: Welfare State Restructuring in Affluent Democracies”, in Id. (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 410-456.

Pizzo B. (2015), “Fuoco incrociato sul planning”, in Moini G. (ed.), Neoliberismi e azione pubblica. Il caso italiano, Roma: Ediesse, pp. 169-188.

Polizzi E. (2008), “Costruire le politiche sociali con la società civile. Piani di zona e partecipazione nella Provincia di Milano”, Autonomie locali e servizi sociali, 4(3): 437-56.

Regonini G. (2005), “Paradossi della democrazia deliberativa”, Stato e mercato, 73: 3-31.

Rhodes R.A.W. (1997), Understanding Governance. Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity, Accountability, Buckingham-Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Rosanvallon P. (1976), L'âge de l'autogestion, Paris: Seuil.

Rose N. (1999), The Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Salamon L. M. (ed. 2002), The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance, New York: Oxford University Press.

Sartori G. (1993), Democrazia: cosa è, Milano: Rizzoli.

Savas E.S. (2000), Privatization and Public-Private Partnerships, New York: CQ Press, 2000.

Savas E.S. (2005), Privatization in the City: Successes, Failures, Lessons, Washington: CQ Press.

Scognamiglio C. (2001), “Le privatizzazioni in Italia a dieci anni dall'avvio della riforma”, Economia italiana, 1: 11-23.

Silver H., A. Scott, and Y. Kazepov (2010), “Participation in Urban Contention and Deliberation”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(3): 453-477.

Springer S. (2012), “Neoliberalism as Discourse: Between Foucauldian Political Economy and Marxian Poststructuralism”, Critical Discourse Studies, 9(2): 133-147.

Steger M.B., R.K. Roy (2010), Neoliberalism. A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stiglitz J. (2002), Globalization and Its Discontents, London: Allen Lane Penguin.

Streeck W. (2013), “The Politics of Public Debt: Neoliberalism, Capitalist Development and the Restructuring of the State”, German Economic Review, 15(1): 143-165.

Thorsen D.E., A. Lie (2007), “What is Neoliberalism?”, Oslo: Department of Political Science, University of Oslo.

van Dijk T.A. (1997), “Discourse as Interaction in Society”, in Id. (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction, London: Sage, pp. 1-37.

van Dijk T.A. (2004), Ideologie. Discorso e costruzione sociale del pregiudizio, Roma: Carocci.Venugopal R. (2015), “Neoliberalism as Concept”, Economy and Society, 44(2): 165-187.

Villa M. (2011), “Partecipazione del terzo settore versus partecipazione dei cittadini? Il nuovo welfare locale tra opportunità e contraddizioni sistemiche”, Autonomie locali e servizi sociali, XVIII: 3-19.

Wacquant L. (2012), “Three Steps to a Historical Anthropology of Actually Existing Neoliberalism”, Social Anthropology, 20: 66-79.

Warin P. (ed. 1997), Quelle modernisation des services publics? Les usagers au cœur des réformes, Paris: La Découverte.

Weiss G., R. Wodak (2003), “Introduction: Theory, Interdisciplinarity and Critical Discourse Analysis”, in Id. (ed.), Critical Discourse Analysis. Theory and Interdisciplinarity, New York: Palgrave & Macmillan, pp. 1-32.

Weller S.O., P. Neill (2014), “An Argument with Neoliberalism: Australia’s Place in a Global Imaginary”, Dialogues in Human Geography, 4(2): 105-130.

Wodak R., M. Meyer (2009), “Critical Discourse, Analysis, History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology”, in Id. (ed.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Sage, pp. 1-33.

Whitfield D. (1983), Making it Public: Evidence and Action Against Privatisation, London: Pluto Press.

Whitfield D. (2006), A Typology of Privatisation and Marketisation, ESSU Research Paper 1, European Services Strategy Unit.

Whitfield D. (2012), In Place of Austerity: Reconstruction of the State, Economy and Public Services, Nottingham: Spokesman Books.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.