آموزش وردپرس ساخت اپلیکیشن

What is the Use of Neoliberalism and Neoliberalisation? Contentious Concepts between Description and Explanation


Abstract


The growing interest in neoliberalism and neoliberalisation has produced a wave of academic production, but also criticisms toward these concepts. They concern the conditions under which they may actually work as both/either explanans and/or explanandum of transformations affecting contemporary societies. The main accusations made are presented and compared with the actual uses of these catego-ries, building above all on the applications made in the articles that follow in this special issue. It is argued that this pair of concepts may help to detect critical processes descriptively, but so far it has not been able to provide explanations. Working more as descriptors, or identifiers of processes and out-comes they, rather, provide indirect paths to explanation, by becoming explananda themselves. It is easier to understand the "why" of social processes and changes starting from these concepts and turning to oth-er "real" theories than by direct use of them. In order to do that we need to operationalize neoliberalism and neoliberalisation as articulated ideal types, so as to take into account the existing varieties of policies, practices and relationships. This is still to be done and looks a lot like being a collective effort based on cumulative research and theorization.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v9i2p308

Keywords: Description/explanation; ideal types; neoliberalism; neoliberalisation; public policy

References


Barnett C. (2005), “The consolations of ’neoliberalism’”, Geoforum, 36(1): 7–12.

Bayliss K., Fine B., Robertson M. and Saad-Filho A. (2015), “Thirteen Things You Need to Know about Neoliberalism”, Thematic Paper, submitted to FESSUD for Deliverable D8.27.

Brenner N. (2004), New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brenner N., Theodore N. (2002), “Cities and the Geographies of ‘Actually Existing Neoliberalism’”, Antipode, 34(3): 349–379.

Brenner N., Peck J., Theodore N. (2010), "Variegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways", Global Networks, 10(2): 182–222.

Burnham P. (2001), “New Labour and the politics of depoliticization”, The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 3(2): 127-49

Cahill D. (2008), “Hegemony and the Neoliberal Historical Block. The Australian experience”, in R. Howson and K. Smith (eds.), Hegemony Studies In Consensus and Coercion, New York: Routledge: 201-217

Castree N. (2006), From neoliberalism to neoliberalisation: Consolations, confusions, and necessary illusions, Environment and Planning, 38(1): 1-6.

Clarke J. (2008), Living with/in and without neo-liberalism. Focaal, 51: 135–147.

Collier S. J. (2012), “Neoliberalism as big Leviathan, or. . .? A response to Wacquant and Hilgers”, Social Anthropology, 20(3): 186–95.

Davies W. (2014), The Limits of Neoliberalism. Authority, Sovereignty and the Logic of Competition, London: Sage.

Ferguson J. (2009), “The Uses of Neoliberalism”, Antipode, 41(1): 166–184.

Flinders M., Buller J. (2006), “Depoliticization: Principles, Tactics and Tools”, British Politics, 1(3): 293-318 .

Ghose R., Pettygrove M. (2014), “Urban Community Gardens as Spaces of Citizenship”, Antipode, 46 (4): 1092–1112.

Haiven M. (2016), “The Commons Against Neoliberalism, the Commons of Neoliberalism, the Commons Beyond Neoliberalism” (abstract), in S. Springer, K. Birch, J. Macleavy (eds.), Handbook of Neoliberalism (book proposal), New York, Routledge.

Hall P. A., (1993), “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain”, Comparative Political Studies, (25)3: 275-296.

Hall S. (2011), “The neo-liberal revolution”, Cultural Studies 25(6), 705–728.

Hall P.A. and M. Lamont (eds. 2013), Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hay, C. (2007), Why We Hate Politics, Cambridge: The Policy Press.

Hay C. (2014), “Depoliticisation as process, governance as practice: what did the ‘first wave’ get wrong and do we need a ‘second wave’ to put it right?”, Policy&Politics, 42 (2): 293-311.

Harvey D. (2007), “Neoliberalism as Creative Destruction”, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 610(1): 21-44.

Hilgers M. (2012), “The historicity of the neoliberal state”, Social Anthropology/ Anthropologie Sociale, 20(1): 80–94.

Jessop B. (2010), “The continuing ecological dominance of neoliberalism in the crisis”, in A. Saad-Philo, G.L. Yalman (eds.), Economic Transitions to Neoliberalism in Middle-Income Countries: Policy dilemmas, economic crises, forms of resisance, Routledge: 24-38.

Jessop B. (2013), “Putting neoliberalism in its time and place: a response to the debate”, Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale, 21(1): 65–74.

Jessop, B. (2014), “Repoliticising depoliticisation: theoretical preliminaries on some responses to the American fiscal and Eurozone debt crises”, Policy&Politics , 42 (2): 207–23

Jobert B., Muller P. (1987), L’État en action, Paris, PUF

Kingdon J. W. (1984), Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, Boston, Little Brown.

Kothari U. (2005) “Authority and expertise: The professionalisation of international development and the ordering of dissent”, Antipode 37(3): 425–46.

Laidlaw J. (2015), “Proposing the motion – A slur for all seasons. Debate: ‘The concept of neoliberalism has become an obstacle to the anthropological understanding of the twenty-first Century”, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 21: 911-923

Lascoumes P., Le Galès P. (2007), “Introduction: Understanding Public Policy through Its Instruments—From the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation”, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20(1): 1–21.

Le Galès P. (2016), “Neoliberalism and Urban Change: Stretching a Good Idea Too Far?”, Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(2): 154–172.

Macartney H. (2011), Variegated neoliberalism. EU varieties of capitalism an international political economy, New York: Routledge

Mair J. (2015), “Proposing the motion – The concept of neoliberalism as a moral schema. Debate: ‘The concept of neoliberalism has become an obstacle to the anthropological understanding of the twenty-first Century”, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, (21): 911-923.

Moini G. (2011), “How participation has become a hegemonic discursive resource: towards an interpretivist research agenda”, Critical Policy Studies, (5)2.

Ong A. (2007), “Neoliberalism as a mobile technology,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1): 1-8

Ong A. (2016), Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty, Durham, NC: Duke University Press

Palma J.G. (2009), “The revenge of the market on the rentiers. Why neo-liberal reports of the end of history turned out to be premature,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33: 829–869

Peck J., Theodore N., Brenner N. (2009), “Neoliberal Urbanism: Models, Moments, Mutations”, SAIS Review, XXIX (1): 49-66.

Peck J. (2004), “Geography and public policy: Constructions of neoliberalism”, Progress in Human Geography, 28 (3): 392–405.

Peck J. (2013), “Explaining (with) Neoliberalism”, Territory, Politics, Governance, 1(2): 132–157.

Peck J., Theodore N., Brenner N. (2013), “Neoliberal Urbanism Redux?”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3): 1091–9.

Peck J., Tickell A. (2002), “Neoliberalizing space”, Antipode, (34): 380–404

Pinson G., Morel Journel C. (2016), “The Neoliberal City – Theory, Evidence, Debates”, Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(2): 137-153.

Rose N., O’Malley P., Valverde M. (2006), “Governmentality”, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2(1): 83–104.

Sabatier P.A. (1993), “Policy change over a decade or more”, in P.A. Sabatier and H. Jenkins-Smith (eds.) Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition Approach, Boulder, CO, Westview Press

Schmidt V. (2012), “Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union”, in E. Jones, A. Menon, S. Weatherill (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Schmidt V., Thatcher M. (2013), Resilient Liberalism in Europe’s Political Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schön D., Rein M. (1994), Frame Reflection: Resolving Intractable Policy Issues, New York: Basic Books

Springer S. (2010), “Neoliberalism and Geography: Expansions, Variegations, Formations”, Geography Compass, 4 (8): 1025–1038

Springer S., Birch K., MacLeavy J. (forthcoming), “An Introduction to Neoliberalism”, in S. Springer K. Birch and J. MacLeavy (eds.), Handbook of Neoliberalism (forthcoming).

Storper M. (2016), “The Neo-liberal City as Idea and Reality”, Territory, Politics, Governance, 4 (2): 241-263.

Sum N. (2009), “The production of hegemonic policy discourses: 'competitiveness' as a knowledge brand and its (re-)contextualizations”, Critical Policy Studies, (3), 2: 184-203.

Sum N., Jessop B. (2013), Towards a cultural political economy. Putting culture in its place in political economy, Northampton: Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Turner R. (2008), Neo-liberal ideology, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Venugopal R. (2015), “Neoliberalism as concept”, Economy and Society, 44(2): 165– 187.

Wacquant L. (2009) The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.

Webb S.A. (2006), Social Work in a Risk Society, Palgrave Macmillan.

Weller S., O’Neil P. (2016), “Neoliberalism in Question” (abstract), in Handbook of Neoliberalism (book proposal edited by S. Springer, K. Birch, J. Macleavy), New York: Routledge.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.