آموزش وردپرس ساخت اپلیکیشن

Media Use, Political Participation and the Level of Digitization. A Comparative Analysis of EU Countries


Abstract


The paper analyses six rounds of the European Social Surveys (from 2000 to 2012) to explore how 1) media uses, 2) unconventional and 3) conventional (i.e. voting) forms of political participation have changed in sixteen European countries. Additionally, the research considers one of the latest surveys to investigate the relation between media use and participation in the contemporary period characterized by open data and e-government. The level of digitization in each country is assessed according to its infrastructure, the legal framework (namely the Freedom of Information Act), the quality of the data available from the public administration, and e-government development in terms of online services. The research question is whether use of the Internet and the level of national digitization affect unconventional forms of political participation. The results demonstrate that both the country’s level of digitization at the macro level and the use of the Web at the individual level are co-determinants of the forms of political participation considered. However, the level of digitization does not affect voting.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v9i1p211

Keywords: digitization; e-government; media power; open data; unconventional participation

References


Blumler J., J. Gurevitch (1995), The crisis of public communication, London and New York, Routledge.

Boulianne S. (2009) “Does internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research”, Political Communication, 26(2): 193–211.

Barnes S. H. and M. Kaase, M. (eds. 1979), Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies, Beverly Hills: Sage.

Bennett W. L. and A. Segerberg, A. (2012), “The Logic of connective action. Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics”, Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768

Bekkers V., and V. Homburg (2007), “The Myths of E-Government: Looking Beyond the Assumptions of a New and Better Government”, Information society, 23(5), 373.382.

Bertot J. C., P.T, Jaeger, and J.M. Grimes (2010), “Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies”, Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264-271.

Brandtzæg, P.B. (2012), “Social Networking Sites: Their Users and Social Implications — A Longitudinal Study”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17 (4):467–488.

Carpentier, N. (2011), Media and Participation. A site of ideological-democratic struggle, Bristol: Intellect.

Cogburn D.L., Espinoza-Vasquez F.K. (2011), “From Networked Nominee to Networked Nation: Examining the Impact of Web 2.0 and Social Media on Political Participation and Civic Engagement in the 2008 Obama Campaign”, Journal of Political Marketing, 10:1-2, 189-213.

Coleman S., J.G. Blumler (2009), The Internet and Democratic Citizenship. Theory, Practice and Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cox M. (2014) “Conundrums in Benchmarking e-Government Capabilities? Perspectives on Evaluating European Usage and Transparency”, Electronic Journal of e-Government, 12 (2): 170-178.

Couldry N., J. Curran J (2003), “The paradox of media power”, in N.

Couldry and J. Curran (eds.), Contesting Media Power. Alternative Media in a Networked World, London: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 3-15.

Curran J. (2011), Media and Democracy, London: Routledge.

Curran J., S. Coen, T. Aalberg, K. Hayashi, P. K. Jones, S. Splendore, S. Papathanassopoulos, D. Rowe, R. Tiffen (2013), "Internet revolution revisited: a comparative study of online news", Media, Culture & Society, 35(7) 880–897.

Curran J., J. Seaton (2003), Power without responsibility. The Press, broadcasting and new media in Britain, London and New York: Routledge.

Dalton R. J., A. Van Sickle, and S. Weldon, S. (2010), “The individual-institutional nexus of protest behaviour”, British Journal of Political Science, 40 (1), 51-73.

della Porta, D. and M. Diani (1999), Social Movements: An Introduction, Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

D’Haenens L., and F. Saeys (eds. 2007), Western Broadcast Models: Structure, Conduct and Performance, Berlin: Mouton.

Ellison N.B., R. Gray, C. Lamp, and A.T. Fiore (2014), “Social capital and resource requests on Facebook”, New media & Society, 16 (7):1104–1121.

Ellison N.B., Steinfield C., and Lampe C. (2007), “The benefits of Facebook ‘friends’: Social capital and college students use of online social network sites”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4):: 1143–1168.

Eltantawy N., Wiest J.B. (2011) "The Arab Spring| Social Media in the Egyptian Revolution: Reconsidering Resource Mobilization Theory", International Journal of Communication, 5: 1207-12.

European Social Survey Round 1 Data (2002), Data file edition 6.4. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.

European Social Survey Round 2 Data (2004), Data file edition 3.4. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.

European Social Survey Round 3 Data (2006), Data file edition 3.5. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.

European Social Survey Round 4 Data (2008), Data file edition 4.3. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.

European Social Survey Round 5 Data (2010), Data file edition 3.2. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.

European Social Survey Round 6 Data (2012), Data file edition 2.1. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.

Eurobarometer. 2009. The Europeans in 2009. Special Eurobarometer 308/Wave 71.1. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_308_en.pdf.

Janssen M., Y. Charalabidis, and A. Zuiderwijk (2012), “Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government”, Information Systems Management (ISM), 29 (4): 258-268.

Fenton N (ed. 2012), New Media, Old News: Journalism and Democracy in the Digital Age, London: Sage.

Gil de Zuniga H., N. Jung, and S. Valenzuela (2012), “Social Media Use for News and Individuals' Social Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication”, 17 (3): 319-336.

Gurstein, M. (2011), "Open data: Empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone?”, First Monday, 2,

http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/3316/2764"%3b>%3b

Haddon L. (2006), “The contribution of domestication research to in-home computing and media consumption”, The Information Society, 22(4): 195–204.

Hallin D. C., and P. Mancini (2004), Comparing Media Systems. Three Models of Media and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Henn M., and N. Foard (2012), “Young people, political participation and trust in Britain”, Parliamentary Affairs, 65(1): 47–67.

Holt K., A. Shehata, J. Strömbäck, and E. Ljungberg (2013), “Age and the effects of news media attention and social media use on political interest and participation: Do social media function as leveller?”, European Journal of Communication, 28(1): 19–34.

Janssen M., and J. van den Hoven (2015), “Big and Open Linked Data (BOLD) in government. A challenge to transparency and privacy”, Government Information Quarterly, 32(4): 363-368.

Lupia A., and T.S. Philpot (2005), “Views from inside the net: How websites affect young adults’ political interest”, Journal of Politics, 67(4): 1122–1142.

McCHeseney R.W., and V. Pickard (eds. 2011), Will the last reporter please turn out the lights. The collapse of journalism and what can be done to fix it, New York and London: The New Press.

McLeod J., D.A. Scheufele and P. Moy (1999), “Community, communication, and participation: the role of mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation”, Political Communication, 16 (3): 315-336.

Meyer, D. S., and Tarrow, S. (eds.1998), The social movement society. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield

Milbrath, L. W., and M. L. Goel (1977), Political participation: How and why do people get involved?,Chicago: Rand McNally.

Morozov, E. (2011), The net delusion: The dark side of internet freedom, New York, NY: Public Affairs.

Mosca, L. and Quaranta, M. (2015), “News diets, social media use and non-institutional participation in three communication ecologies: comparing Germany, Italy and the UK”, Information, Communication & Society, DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1105276.

Mosco V. (2004), The digital sublime. Myth, Power and Cyberspace, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Norris P. (2000), A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Norris, P. (2002), Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Pasek J., E. More, and D. Romer (2009), “Realizing the social internet? Online social networking meets offline civic engagement”, Journal of Information Technology & Politics 6 (3-4): 197–215.

Rettberg J. W. (2009) "Freshly Generated for You, and Barack Obama. How Social Media Represent Your Life", European Journal of CommunicationVol 24(4): 451–466.

Robinson D., H. Yun, W. Zeller, and E.W. Felten (2009) "Government data and the invisible hand", Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 11 (1): 1-17.

Rosenstone S. J., and J.M. Hansen (1993), Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America, New York: Macmillan.

Sarti S. (2007), “La regressione logistica”, in A. De Lillo, G. Argentin,

M. Lucchini, S. Sarti, and M. Terraneo (eds.), Analisi Multivariata per le Scienze Sociali, Milano: Pearson Paravia Bruno Mondadori, pp. 159–195.

Shehata, A., and J. Strömbäck (2011), “A Matter of Context: A Comparative Study of Media Environments and News Consumption Gaps in Europe”, Political Communication, 28(1):110–34.

Solomon B., R. Bhuvaneswari, and P. Rajan (2007), “Bhoomi: ‘E–governance’, or, an anti–politics machine necessary to globalize Bangalore?” CASUM–m Working Paper,

http://casumm.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/bhoomi-e-governance.pdf, accessed 10 September 2015.

Strömbäck J., and A. Shehata (2010), “Media malaise or a virtuous circle? Exploring the causal relationships between news media exposure, political news attention and political interest”, European Journal of Political Research, 49(5): 575–597.

Van Deth J.W. (2000), “Interesting but irrelevant: Social capital and the saliency of politics in Western Europe”, European Journal of Political Research, 37(2): 115–147.

Verba S., K.L. Schlozman, and H.E. Brady (1995), Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wattenberg M.P. (1984), The decline of American political parties, 1952–1980, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wolfsfeld G., Segev E., and Sheafer T. (2013), "Social Media and the Arab Spring Politics Comes First", The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18 (2): 11-137.

World Wide Web Foundation, the (2014), Open Data Barometer. Global Report retrieved at http://barometer.opendataresearch.org/assets/downloads/Open%20Data%20Barometer%20-%20Global%20Report%20-%202nd%20Edition%20-%20PRINT.pdf

Xenos M., and P. Moy (2007) “Direct and differential effects of the internet on political and civic engagement”, Journal of Communication, 57(4): 704–718.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.