Politics During and After Covid-19: Science, Health and Social Protest


Abstract


Covid-19 represented a total social fact, especially for that part of the world (the so-called Global North and in particular its wealthier component) which is less used to face dramatic crises able to affect fundamental rights and provoke health threats on a daily basis. While acknowledging its enormous impact on individual biographies, political systems and socio-economic equilibria around the planet, however we contrast those interpretations that have tended to naturalize the pandemic event, reading it as unpredictable, unique, disconnected from the dynamics that guide the (mainstream) Western lifestyle and mode of production. On the contrary, the genesis and above all the management of Covid-19 are the result and the mirror of broader dynamics linked to modernity, colonialism, capitalism, in one word of the Capitalocene. For this reason, it is even more correct to speak of a syndemic, to underline the environmental determinants of health, and the social and economic inequalities (re)produced by Covid-19. We therefore consider that interpreting the pandemic/syndemic (and its governance) as a state of exception is at least partial, being instead more useful to identify its unveiling function, able to make some latent or less visible dynamics manifest. Based on such premises, we focus on some nodes of the syndemic governance, highlighting how this contributed to give continuity and accelerate typical dynamics of a neoliberal governance and worldvision. We deal in particular with four key issues: the treatment of "science" by the media; the political history of "public health" and its relationship to the modern state; the construction of legitimate dissent vs. the constructed irrationality of "conspiracy theory"; the outcomes of social protests and in particular their pathologization in the mediatic and public debate. These are also among the main topics which are critically discussed in the thirteen papers that compose this Special Issue, from a variety of disciplinary fields, and with diverse epistemological perspectives and methodological tools.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v15i3p507

Keywords: Covid-19 pandemic; syndemic; public health; science; conspiracy theories; vaccine hesitancy; social movements

References


Agamben G. (2005), State of Exception, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Agamben G. (2021), Where Are We Now? The Epidemic as Politics. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Aillon J. L. and Cardito M. (2020), “Health and Degrowth in times of Pandemic”, Visions for Sustainability, 14: 3-23.

Albuquerque S. and Santos A. R. (2021), “In the same Storm, but not on the same Boat”: Children grief during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12: 638866.

Alteri L., Parks L., Raffini L. and Vitale T. (2021), “Covid-19 and the Structural Crisis of Liberal Democracies. Determinants and Consequences of the Governance of Pandemic”, Partecipazione e Conflitto, 14(1): 1-37.

Amankwah-Amoah J., Khan Z., Wood G. and Knight G. (2021), “COVID-19 and digitalization: The great acceleration”, Journal of Business Research, 136: 602-611.

Amselle J. (2020), “Bio-pouvoir ou thanatocratie?” published April 8th on Bibliobs.

Attwell K., Ward P. R., Meyer S. B., Rokkase P. J. and Leask J. (2018), “Do-it Yourself: Vaccine Rejection and Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM)”, Social Science and Medicine, 196: 106-114.

Arminjon M. and Marion-Veyron R. (2021), “Coronavirus Biopolitics: The Paradox of France’s Foucauldian Heritage”, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 43(1): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-020-00359-2

Berridge V. (2007), Marketing Health: Smoking and the Discourse of Public Health in Britain, 1945-2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bertuzzi N. (2021), “Conspiracy theories and social movements studies: A research agenda”, Sociology Compass, 15(12): e12945.

Blume S. (2006), “Anti-vaccination Movements and Their Interpretations”, Social Science & Medicine, 62(3): 628–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.020

Bickerton C.J., Accetti Invernizzi C.I. (2021), Technopopulism: The new logic of democratic politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre 1984. Distinction - A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. New York: Harvard & Routledge.

Bourdieu P. (1996), Sur la télévision, Paris: Liber-Raisons d'agir.

Bratich, Jack Z. 2008. Conspiracy Panics: Political Rationality and Popular Culture. Albany: SUNY Press.

Bucchi, M. and Trench, B. (2017). Science Communication and Science in Society: A Conceptual Review in Ten Keywords. TECNOSCIENZA: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 7 (2), 151–168.

Calibeo, D. L. and Hindmarsh, R. (2022), “From Fake News to Echo-Chambers: On The Limitations of New Media for Environmental Activism in Australia, and ‘Activist-Responsive Adaptation’”, Environmental Communication, 16 (4): 490-504.

Carmody P., McCann G., Colleran C. and O’Halloran C. (2020). Covid-19 in the Global South: impacts and responses. Bristol: Bristol University Press.

Cavicchi I. (2022), La scienza impareggiabile, Roma: Castelvecchi.

Cesaire A. (1959) Discourse on Colonialism, New York: Monthly Review Press.

Cinelli M., Quattrociocchi W., Galeazzi A., Valensise C.M., Brugnoli E., Schmidt A.L., Zola P., Zollo F. and Scala A. (2020), “The COVID-19 social media infodemic”, Scientific Reports, 10: 16598.

Cohen S. (2011), “Folk Devils and Moral Panics”, London: Routledge.

Cole H. V., Anguelovski I., Baró F., García-Lamarca M., Kotsila P., Pérez del Pulgar C., ... and Triguero-Mas M. (2021), “The COVID-19 pandemic: power and privilege, gentrification, and urban environmental justice in the global north”, Cities & Health, 5(sup1): S71-S75.

Coleman, Gabriella (2014). Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy: The Many Faces of Anonymous. NY: Verso.

Coleman, Gabriella. (2022). "From Busting Cults to Breeding Cults: Anonymous Hacktivism vs. QAnon " Feminist and Accessible Publishing and Communications Technologies Speaker and Workshop Series, McGill University Institute for Gender, Sexuality and Feminist Studies

Coleman W. (1987), Yellow Fever in the North. The Methods of Early Epidemiology, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Colgrove J. (2006), State of Immunity: The Politics of Vaccination in Twentieth-Century America, Berkeley: University of California Press.

Collins H. and Evans R. (2007), Rethinking Expertise, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Collins, H. and Evans, R. (2014). Quantifying the Tacit: The Imitation Game and Social Fluency. Sociology, 48(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038512455735

Collins, H., Bartlett, A. and Reyes-Galindo, L. (2017), Demarcating Fringe Science for Policy. Perspectives on Science (2017) 25 (4): 411–438, https://doi.org/10.1162/POSC_a_00248

Comaroff, John and Jean Comaroff. (1999). "Occult Economies and the Violence of Abstraction: notes from the South African postcolony." American Ethnologist 26 (2):279-303.

Cone L., Brøgger K., Berghmans M., Decuypere M., Förschler A., Grimaldi E., ... and Vanermen L. (2021), “Pandemic Acceleration: Covid-19 and the emergency digitalization of European education”, European Educational Research Journal, 14749041211041793.

Crouch C. (2004), Post-democracy, Cambridge: Polity.

Dardot P. and Laval C. (2013), The new way of the world: on neoliberal society, London: Verso.

deHaven-Smith, Lance. (2013). Conspiracy Theory in America. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Demaria F. and Kothari A. (2017), “The Post-Development Dictionary agenda: paths to the pluriverse”, Third World Quarterly, 38(12): 2588-2599.

Dentico N. (2020), Ricchi e buoni? Le trame oscure del filantrocapitalismo, Verona: EMI.

Dentico N. and Missoni E. (2021), Geopolitica della salute: Covid-19, OMS e la sfida pandemica. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.

Dingwall, Robert (2001). "Contemporary Legends, rumours and collective behaviour; some neglected resources for medical sociology." Sociology of Health and Illness 23 (2):180-202.

Escobar A. (1991), “Anthropology and the development encounter: the making and marketing of development anthropology”, American ethnologist, 18(4): 658-682.

Fahy, D. and Lewenstein, B. (2014). Scientists in Popular Culture: The Making of Celebrities, in M. Bucchi e B. Trench (a cura di) Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology (pp. 83-96). Londra e New York: Routledge.

Fassin, Didier. (2021). "The Heuristics of Conspiracy Theories." Current Anthropology 62 (2).

Florida R. (2017). The new urban crisis: How our cities are increasing inequality, deepening segregation, and failing the middle class-and what we can do about it, London: Hachette.

Foucart S., Horel S. and Laurens S. (2020), Les Gardiens de la Raison: Enquête sur la Désinformation Scientifique, Paris: La Découverte.

Foucault, Michel. (2004). L’ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard.

Foucault M. (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics. Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Foucault M. (2014), “The politics of health in the eighteenth century”, Foucault Studies, 18: 113–127. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i18.4654

Franck, G. (2014). Économie de l’attention, in Y. Citton (a cura di) L’économie de l’attention: Nouvel horizon du capitalisme? (pp. 55-72). Paris: La Découverte.

Galli G. and Bochicchio F. (2016), Scacco alla superclass. La nuova oligarchia che governa il mondo e i metodi per limitarne lo strapotere, Milano-Udine: Mimesis.

Gazendam A., Ekhtiari S., Wong, E., Madden, K., Naji L., Phillips M., Mundi R., Bhandari M. and Mohit M. (2020), “The ‘Infodemic’ of Journal Publication Associated with the Novel Coronavirus Disease”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 102(13): e64.

Giones F., Brem A., Pollack J. M., Michaelis T. L., Klyver K. and Brinckmann J. (2020), “Revising entrepreneurial action in response to exogenous shocks: Considering the COVID-19 pandemic”, Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 14: e00186.

Gobo G. and Sena B. (2022), “Questioning and disputing vaccination policies. Scientists and experts in the Italian public debate”, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 42(1-2): 25-38, https://doi.org/10.1177/02704676221080928.

Goldenberg M. (2016), “Public Misunderstanding of Science? Reframing the Problem of Vaccine Hesitancy”, Perspectives on Science, 24 (5): 552-81.

Goodin R. E. and Le Grand J. (2018), Not only the poor: The middle classes and the welfare state. New York, London: Routledge.

Harambam, Jaron. (2020). Contemporary Conspiracy Culture: Truth and Knowledge in an Era of Epistemic Instability. London: Routledge.

Hickel J. (2019), “The contradiction of the sustainable development goals: Growth versus ecology on a finite planet”, Sustainable Development, 27(5): 873-884.

Hobson-West P. (2003), “Understanding Vaccination Resistance: Moving Beyond Risk”, Health, Risk and Society, 5(3): 273-283.

Hooijer G. and King D. (2022), “The racialized pandemic: Wave one of COVID-19 and the reproduction of global North inequalities”, Perspectives on Politics, 20(2): 507-527.

Horton R. (2020), “Offline: COVID-19 is not a pandemic”, The Lancet, 396(10255): 874.

Højme P. (2022), “Biopolitics and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Foucauldian Interpretation of the Danish Government’s Response to the Pandemic”, Philosophies, 7(34). https://doi.org/10.3390/ philosophies7020034

Jasanoff S. (2017), “Science and democracy”, in Felt U., Fouché R., Miller C.A. and Smith-Doerr L. (eds), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 4th edn. Cambridge: The MIT Press: 259–288.

Jung, C.G. 1978. Flying Saucers - A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Skies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Katz R.S. and Mair P. (1995), “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy. The Emergence of the Cartel Party”, Party Politics, 1(1): 5-28. DOI: 10.1177/1354068895001001001.

Katz R.S. and Mair P. (2009), “The Cartel Party Thesis: A Restatement”, Perspectives on Politics, 7(4), 753-766. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592709991782.

Kaul S., Akbulut B., Demaria F. and Gerber J. F. (2022), “Alternatives to sustainable development: what can we learn from the pluriverse in practice?”, Sustainability Science, 17(4): 1149-1158.

Keeley, Brian L. . (1999). "Of Conspiracy Theories." Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):109-126.

Kitschelt H. and McGann A. J. (1997), The radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. Ann Harbor: University of Michigan Press.

Kriesi H. and Oana I. E. (2022), “Protest in unlikely times: dynamics of collective mobilization in Europe during the COVID-19 crisis”, Journal of European Public Policy, 1-26.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolution, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Lasco G. (2020), “Medical populism and the COVID-19 pandemic”, Global Public Health, 15(10): 1417-1429, DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1807581.

Lasco G. (2022), “Medical Populism”, in Oswald M. (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Populism, London: Palgrave Macmillan: 341-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_20

Lasco G. and Curato N. (2019), “Medical populism”, Social Ccience & Medicine, 221_ 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.006

Lagalisse, Erica. (2019). Occult Features of Anarchism - With Attention to the Conspiracy of Kings and the Conspiracy of the Peoples: PM Press.

Latour B. (1987), Science in Action, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Le Bon G. (1895), Psychologie des foules. Paris: Alcan.

Lello E. (2020), “Populismo anti-scientifico o nodi irrisolti della biomedicina? Prospettive a confronto intorno al movimento free vax”, Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 61(3): 479-508.

Lello E. and Saltelli A. (2022), “Lobbismo scientifico e dirottamento dello spazio pubblico”, in Lello E. and Bertuzzi N. (Eds.), Dissenso informato. Pandemia: il dibattito mancato e le alternative possibili, Roma: Castelvecchi: 187-203.

Mair P. (2013), Ruling the void: The hollowing of Western democracy, London: Verso books.

Mair S. (2020), “Neoliberal economics, planetary health, and the COVID-19 pandemic: a Marxist ecofeminist analysis”, The Lancet Planetary Health, 4(12), e588-e596.

Malm A. (2020), Corona, climate, chronic emergency: War communism in the twenty-first century. London: Verso.

McNeill W. (1976), Plagues and Peoples, New York: Doubleday.

Mendenhall E., Newfield T. and Tsai A. C. (2022), “Syndemic theory, methods, and data”, Social Science & Medicine, 295: 114656.

Missoni E., Pacileo G. and Tediosi F. (2019), Global Health Governance and Policy: An Introduction, London-New York: Routledge.

Moffitt B. (2016), The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Moore J. (2016), Anthropocene or capitalocene?: Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. Oakland: Pm Press.

Morin E. (1999), Les sept savoirs nécessaires à l'éducation du futur, Paris: Unesco Publishing.

O'Callaghan-Gordo C. and Antó J. M. (2020), “COVID-19: The disease of the Anthropocene”, Environmental Research, 187: 109683.

OMS (2020), Novel Coronavirus(2019-nCoV)Situation Report-13, published Febuary 2nd, 2020.

Oreskes N. and Conway E. M. (2011), Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming, London: Bloomsbury.

Osimani B., Ilardo M. L., & Castaldo P. (2020), Science as a Weapon of Mass Distraction. MEDIC, 28(1): 30-49.

Pagán, Victoria E. (2004). Conspiracy Narratives in Roman History. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Pagán, Victoria E. . (2008). "Toward a Model of Conspiracy Theory for Ancient Rome." New German Critique 35 (1).

Papapicco C. (2020), “Informative Contagion: The Coronavirus (COVID-19) in Italian journalism”, Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 10(3): e202014.

Pariser E. (2011), The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you, New York: Penguin Press.

Paulson S., D'Alisa G., Demaria F. and Kallis G. (2020). The case for degrowth. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

Pedroni M. (2020), “Narrazioni virali. Decostruire (e ricostruire) il racconto dell’emergenza coronavirus”, Mediascapes Journal, 15: 24-43.

Pele A. and Riley S. (2021), “For a Right to Health Beyond Biopolitics: The Politics of Pandemic and the ‘Politics of Life’”. Law, Culture and the Humanities. 1743872120978201

Pelkmans, Matijs and Rhys Machold (2011). "Conspiracy Theories and their Truth Trajectories." Focaal - Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology 59:66-80.

Pelling M. (1978), Cholera Fever and English Medicine 1825–1865, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pellizzoni L. and Biancheri R. (2021) (Eds.), Scienza in discussione? Dalla controversia sui vaccini all’emergenza Covid-19. Milano: Franco Angeli.

Pellizzoni L. and Sena B. (2021), “Preparedness as Governmentality. Probing the Italian Management of the Covid-19 Emergency”, Sociologica, 15(3): 61–83. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/13530.

Pielke Jr. R. A. (2007), The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Popper, Karl. (1966). The Open Society and its Enemies. . Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Porter D. (1994) (Ed.), The history of public health and the modern state, Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Porter D. (1998), Health, Civilization and the State: A History of Public Health from Ancient to Modern Times, London, New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203980576

Raffini L. (2022), “Tra tecnocrazia e populismo. Crisi della comunicazione pubblica e spirale della delegittimazione nel contesto pandemico”, in Lello E. and Bertuzzi N. (eds.) Dissenso Informato. Pandemia: il dibattito mancato e le alternative possibili, Roma: Castelvecchi: 133-148.

Rohlinger D.A. and Meyer D.S. (2022), “Protest During a Pandemic: How Covid-19 Affected Social Movements in the United States”, American Behavioral Scientist, 00027642221132179

Rose, N. (2007), The Politics of Life Itself. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Rosen G. (1958), The History of Public Health, New York: MD Publications.

Rosenberg C. (1962), The Cholera Years 1832, 1849 and 1866, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rothkopf D.J. (2003), “When the Buzz Bites Back”, published May 11th on The Washington Post.

Sabucedo J. M., Alzate M. and Hur D. (2020), “COVID-19 and the metaphor of war”, International Journal of Social Psychology, 35(3): 618-624.

Saltelli A., Dankel D. J., Di Fiore M., Holland N. and Pigeon, M. (2022), “Science, the Endless Frontier of Regulatory Capture”, Futures, 135: 102860.

Sandbakken E. M. and Moss S. M. (2021) “Now We Are All in the Same Boat. At the Same Time, We Are Not.” Meaning-Making and Coping Under COVID-19 Lockdown in Norway”. Human Arenas, 1-25.

Sanders, Todd and Harry West. (2003). "Power revealed and concealed in the New World Order." In Transparency and Conspiracy, edited by Harry West and Todd Sanders, 1-37. Durham: Duke University Press.

Shir-Raz Y., Elisha E., Martin B., Ronel N. and Guetzkow, J. (2022), “Censorship and Suppression of Covid-19 Heterodoxy: Tactics and Counter-Tactics”, Minerva, 1-27.

Shiva V. (2022), Philanthrocapitalism and the Erosion of Democracy. Santa Fe: Synergetic Press.

Simis M. J., Madden H., Cacciatore M. A. and Yeo, S. K. (2016), “The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?”, Public Understanding of Science, 25(4): 400-414.

Singer M. (1994), “AIDS and the health crisis of the US urban poor; the perspective of critical medical anthropology”, Social science & medicine, 39(7): 931-948.

Sparke M. and Williams O. D. (2022), “Neoliberal disease: COVID-19, co-pathogenesis and global health insecurities”, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(1): 15-32.

Sobo, Elisa J. and Elżbieta Drążkiewicz (2021). "Rights, Responsibilities and Revelations - Covid-19 Conspiracy Theories and the State." In Viral Loads: Anthropologies of Urgency in the Time of COVID-19, edited by N.J. Burke L. Manderson, and A. Wahlberg, 67-88. London: UCL Press.

Sunstein, Cass and Adrian Vermeule (2009). "Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures." Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2):202-27.

Sunstein C. (2017), #Republic. Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Swami, V., A. Furnham. (2014). "Political Paranoia and conspiracy theories." In Power, Politics and Paranoia: Why People are Suspicious of their Leaders, edited by P.A.M. van Lange J.P. Prooijen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sylvia J.J. IV (2020), “The Biopolitics of Social Distancing”, Social Media + Society, 6(3): 2056305120947661. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120947661

Walker E. T. (2014), Grassroots for Hire: Public Affairs Consultants in American Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ward J.K. (2016), “Rethinking the Antivaccine Movement Concept: A Case Study of Public Criticism of the Swine Flu Vaccine’s Safety in France”, Social Science & Medicine, 159: 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.05.003.

Wynne B. (2014), “Further Disorientation in the Hall of Mirrors”, Public Understanding of Science, 23 (1): 60 -70.

Zarocostas J. (2020). “How to fight an infodemic”, The Lancet, 395: 10225.

Zuboff S. (2019), The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile Books.

Zuiderveen Borgesius F. J., Trilling D., Möller J., Bodó B., de Vreese C. H. and Helberger N. (2016), “Should we worry about filter bubbles?”, Internet Policy Review, 5(1): 1-6.

Papers published in this Special Issue

Lucchini F. and Marzulli M. (2022), “The Scientific Controversy on Covid-19 and the Image of Science as an Expert System: Comparing the Debate in Italy and UK”, Partecipazione e Conflitto, 15(3):

Pilati F. and Miconi A. (2022), “The “Green Pass” Controversy in the Italian Twittersphere: a Digital Methods Mapping”, Partecipazione e Conflitto, 15(3):

Campo E., De Toffoli M., Gobo G., and Strata F. (2022), “Early Home Therapies against Covid-19. An Italian Case of Politicisation of Science?”, Partecipazione e Conflitto, 15(3):

Cervia S., Sawicka M., Sena B., and Serapioni M. (2022), “Looking at Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy through a macro perspective. A comparative study of Italy, Poland and Portugal”, Partecipazione e Conflitto, 15(3):

Vallerani S. (2022), “From Availability to Accessibility. Vaccination Proximity in a Social Clinic in Palermo”, Partecipazione e Conflitto, 15(3):

Webb S. (2022), “Understanding the Impact of (Anti-)Racism on Covid-19 Vaccine Allocation Decision-Making”, Partecipazione e Conflitto, 15(3):

Drazkiewitz E. (2022), “ Virtuosos of Mimesis and Mimicry: a Case Study of Movements Propagating Conspiracy Theories in Ireland and Poland”, Partecipazione e Conflitto, 15(3):

Lello E., Bertuzzi N., Pedroni M., and Raffini L. (2022), “Vaccine hesitancy and refusal during the Covid-19 pandemic in Italy: Individualistic claims or repoliticization?”, Partecipazione e Conflitto, 15(3):

Morsello B. and Giardullo P. (2022), “Free choice in the making: Vaccine-related activism as an alternative form of citizenship during the Covid-19 pandemic”, Partecipazione e Conflitto, 15(3):

della Porta D. and Lavizzari A. (2022), “Waves in Cycle: The protests against anti-contagion measures and vaccination in Covid-19 times in Italy”, Partecipazione e Conflitto, 15(3):

García Agustín O. and Nissen A. (2022), “The Anti-Restrictions Movement and the Populist Counterpublics in Denmark”, Partecipazione e Conflitto, 15(3):

Gardini E. (2022), “The technocratic reason in the government of emergency. A theoretical analysis on the management of the Covid-19 epidemic”, Partecipazione e Conflitto, 15(3):

Stocco, N. (2022), “The Conspiracy Theory/Vaccine Hesitancy nexus as rhetorical boundary work. A critical analysis of the production of scientific ignorance in literature reviews”, Partecipazione e Conflitto, 15(3):


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.