Civic Collaboration and Urban Commons. Citizen's Voices on a Public Engagement Experience in an Italian City


Abstract


The article focuses on "public engagement" and recent modifications in citizen participation through a case study regarding the "collaborative governance" of urban commons in the city of Bologna (Italy). Civic collaboration is an experimental partnership which is being implemented between public administrations and citizens in order to develop, treat and reuse commons with a view to improving the quality of life in cities. The goal of the project is to understand whether, and how, civic collaboration is also transforming citizen participation in local public policies. This article presents the results of research which was performed by interviewing citizens who are involved in the collaborative governance of urban commons. This contribution aims to connect the literature regarding "open government" and its impact on participation with the consolidated debate regarding the role of culture in the conception of citizenship and civic engagement and, as a consequence, in the effectiveness of collaborative governance. Particular attention was paid to citizen engagement, and to the role performed by both public and private platforms and digital media.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v13i2p1132

Keywords: civic collaboration; civic engagement; collaborative governance; Italy; participation; public engagement; urban commons

References


Arena G. (1997), “Introduzione all’amministrazione condivisa”, Studi parlamentari e di politica costituzionale, 3°-4° trimestre, 117-118: 29–65.

Arena G., C. Iaione (eds. 2012), L’Italia dei beni comuni, Roma: Carocci.

Bakardjieva M. (2011), “Reconfiguring the mediapolis: New media and civic agency”, New media and society, 14(1): 63-79.

Bakardjieva M. (2019), “Platform Politics in Europe | A Tale of Three Platforms: Collaboration, Contestation, and Degrees of Audibility in a Bulgarian e-Municipality”, International Journal of Communication, [S.l.], v. 13, p. 19, oct. 2019. ISSN 1932-8036, Available at: . Date accessed: 15 Jun. 2020.

Bartoletti R. (2013), “Pratiche di consumo e civic engagement: il consumo impegnato di natura in città”, in R. Bartoletti, F. Faccioli (eds.), Comunicazione e civic engagement: Media, spazi pubblici e processi di partecipazione, Milano: FrancoAngeli, pp. 201-222.

Bartoletti R., F. Faccioli (eds. 2013), Comunicazione e civic engagement: Media, spazi pubblici e processi di partecipazione, Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Bartoletti R., F. Faccioli (2016), “Public Engagement, Local Policies, and Citizens’ Participation: An Italian Case Study of Civic Collaboration”, Social Media + Society, 2(3): 1–11, DOI: 10.1177/2056305116662187

Bartoletti R., F. Faccioli (2020), “Public engagement e pratiche partecipative: una mappatura della collaborazione civica a Bologna”, in R. Paltrinieri (ed.), Culture e pratiche di partecipazione. Collaborazione civica, rigenerazione urbana e costruzione di comunità, Milano: FrancoAngeli, in press.

Batory A., S. Svensson (2019), “The fuzzy concept of collaborative governance: A systematic review of the state of the art”, Central European Journal of Public Policy, 13(2): 28–39.

Bennett W.L., A. Segerberg (2012), “The logic of connective action”, Information, Communication & Society, 15: 739–768.

Bertot J.C., P.T. Jaeger and D. Hansen (2012), “The impact of policies on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations”, Government Information Quarterly, 29(1): 30-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004.

Bifulco L. (2005), Deliberazione, arene pubbliche e institution building, in L. Pellizzoni (ed.) La deliberazione pubblica, Roma: Meltemi, pp. 137-154.

Bobbio L. (2013), “Democrazia dei cittadini e democrazia deliberativa”, COSMOPOLIS. Rivista di cultura, VIII, 1 https://www.cosmopolisonline.it/articolo.php?numero=VIII12013&id=12

Boccia Artieri G. (2012), Stati di connessione. Pubblici, cittadini e consumatori nella (Social) Network Society, Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Bourdieu P. (1979), La distinction, Paris: Éditions de Minuit.

Bovaird T. (2007), “Beyond engagement and participation: user and community coproduction of public services”, Public Administration Review, 67(5): 856–860.

Bovaird T., G.G.Van Ryzin, E. Loeffler and S. Parrado (2015), “Activating citizens to participate in collective co-production of public services”, Journal of Social Policy, 44(1): 1–23.

Bowen S. A (2013), “Using classic social media cases to distill ethical guidelines for digital engagement”, Journal of Mass Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality, 28(2): 119-133.

Canel M.J., K .Sanders (2012), Government Communication: an

Emerging Field in Political Communication Research, in H. Semetko, M. Scammel (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Political Communication, London: Sage, pp. 85-96.

Canel M.J., V. Luoma-aho (2018), Public sector communication: Closing Gaps Between Citizens and Public Organizations, Boston: Wiley Blackwell.

Carpentier N. (2011), Media and participation: A site of ideological-democratic struggle, Bristol, UK: Intellect.

Cartocci R. (2007), Mappe del tesoro. Atlante del capitale sociale in Italia, Bologna: Il Mulino.

Cellamare C. (2019), Città Fai-Da-Te. Tra antagonismo e cittadinanza. Storie di autorganizzazione urbana, Roma: Donzelli.

Coleman S., J. Blumler (2009), The Internet and democratic citizenship: Theory, practice and policy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Coleman S., J. Gotze (2001), Bowling together: Online public engagement in policy deliberation, London: Hansard Society.

Coleman S., J. A. Firmstone (2014), “Contested meanings of public engagement: Exploring discourse and practice within a British city council”, Media Culture Society, 36: 826–844.

Couldry N (2006), “Culture and citizenship: The missing link?”, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(3): 321–339.

Crouch C. (2004), Post-democracy, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Dahlgren P. (2009), Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication and democracy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Dahlgren P. (2013), “Reinventare la partecipazione. Civic agency e mondo della rete”, in R. Bartoletti, F. Faccioli (eds.), Comunicazione e civic engagement: Media, spazi pubblici e processi di partecipazione, Milano: FrancoAngeli, pp. 17–37.

Dahlgren P. (2014), “Political participation via the web: Structural and subjective contingencies”, Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture, 5: 255–269.

Dahlgren P. (2015), “Probing the EU public sphere: Participation and civic cultures”, Quaderni di sociologia, LIX, 68: 5–21.

Dahlgren P. (2018), “Media, knowledge and trust: the deepening epistemic crisis of democracy”, Javnost: The Public, 25(1-2): 20-27.

D’Albergo E., G. Moini (eds. 2007), Partecipazione, movimenti e politiche pubbliche a Roma, Roma: Aracne.

Dalton R. J. (2008), “Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation”, Political Studies, 56: 76–98.

D’Ambrosi L. (2019), La comunicazione pubblica dell’Europa. Istituzioni, cittadini e media digitali, Roma: Carocci.

De Biase A., C.M. Marelli and O. Zaza (2018), “Urban Nature in the Digital Age From Collective Urban Gardens to Individual Micro-Landscapes”, Built Environment, 44(3): 354-373, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.44.3.354

De Blasio E., D. Selva (2019), “Implementing open government: a qualitative comparative analysis of digital platforms in France, Italy and United Kingdom”, Quality Quantity, 53: 871–896 .

de Certeau M. (1990) [1980], L’invention du quotidien. 1 Arts de faire, Paris: Gallimard.

Delli Carpini M. (2004), “Mediating democratic engagement: the impact of communications on citizens’ involvement in political and civic life”, in L. Lee Kaid (ed.), Handbook of Political Communication Research, London: LEA, pp. 395–434.

Demos & PI. (2019), Gli Italiani e lo Stato, Rapporto 2019, http://www.demos.it/rapporto.php

Donolo C. (2005), “Dalle politiche pubbliche alle pratiche sociali nella produzione di beni pubblici? Osservazioni su una nuova generazione di policies”, Stato e Mercato, 73(April): 33-61.

Donolo C. (2011), Italia sperduta. La sindrome del declino e le chiavi per uscirne, Roma: Donzelli.

Ducci G. (2015), “Public communication in the Processes of Transparency and Accountability in the Era of Open Data”, Sociology Study, 5(2): 83-90.

Edelman (2020), Edelman Trust Barometer 2020, Available at https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2020-01/2020%20Edelman%20Trust%20Barometer%20Global%20Report_LIVE.pdf

European Commission (2001), White Paper on European Governance, Brussels: European Commission.

Faccioli F. (2016), “Comunicazione pubblica e media digitali: la prospettiva del public engagement”, Problemi dell'informazione, 41(1): 13-36.

Firmstone J., S. Coleman (2015), “Public engagement in local government: The voice and influence of citizens in online communicative spaces”, Information, Communication & Society, 18: 680–695.

Garcìa M. (2006), “Citizenship Practices and Urban Governance in European Cities”, Urban Studies, 43(4): 745-765.

Hermes J., P. Dahlgren (2006), “Cultural studies and citizenship”, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(3): 259-265.

Iaione C., I. Pais and E. De Nictolis (2020), “Valutare: la valutazione dei patti di collaborazione”, in R. Paltrinieri (ed.), Culture e pratiche di partecipazione. Collaborazione civica, rigenerazione urbana e costruzione di comunità, Milano: FrancoAngeli, in press.

Jessop B. (2002), “Liberalism, Neoliberalism and Urban Governance: a State Theoretical Perspective”, Antipode, 34(3): 452-472.

Labsus (2019), Voci in comune. Le parole chiave dell’amministrazione condivisa, consultabile all’indirizzo https://www.labsus.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Voci-in-comune.pdf

Lefebvre H. (2009), Le droit à la ville, Paris: Economica.

Lewanski R., L. Mosca (2003), “I comitati cittadini a Bologna negli anni ‘90”, Metronomie, 27: 75-121.

Lovari A., C. Valentini (2020), “Public sector communication and social media: opportunities and limits of current policies, activities and practices”, in V. Luoma-Aho, M. J. Canel (eds.), Handbook of Public Sector Communication, Hoboken (USA): Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 315-328.

Mayntz, R. (1998), New challenges to governance theory, Jean Monnet Chair Paper RSC No 98/50, European University Institute, Retrieved from http://www.uned.es/113016/docen- cia/spd%20-%20doctorado%202001-02/Introducci%F3n/Mayntz%20governance%20EUI%201998.htm

Moini G. (2012), Teoria critica della partecipazione: Un approccio sociologico, Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Montesperelli P. (2014), Comunicare e interpretare. Introduzione all'ermeneutica per la ricerca sociale, Milano: Egea.

Moro G. (2013), Cittadinanza attiva e qualità della democrazia, Roma: Carocci.

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2001a), Cities for Citizens. Improving Metropolitan Governance, Paris: Author.

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2001b), Citizens as Partners: OECD Handbook on Information, consultation and public participation in Policy Making, Paris: Author.

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2009). Focus on citizens: Public engagement for better policy and services. Paris: Author.

Ostrom E. (1990), Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Paltrinieri R., G. Allegrini (2018), “Partecipazione e collaborazione negli interventi di comunità. L’esperienza dei laboratori di quartiere del Comune di Bologna”, Sociologia urbana e rurale, 116: 29-44.

Papacharissi Z. (2010), A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age., Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Papacharissi Z. (2015), Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics, New York: Oxford University Press.

Piazza G., L. Mosca, R. Lewanski and M. Andretta (2006), “Protests and Arguments: The Citizens’ Committees’ Campaign against Traffic in Four Italian Cities”, World Political Science, 1(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-6226.1003.

Putnam R. D. (1993), Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Rondinelli A.D. (ed. 2006), Public administration and democratic governance: Governments serving citizens. United Nation Publications. Retrieved from http://unpan1.un.org/ intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan025063.pdf

Rosanvallon P. (2008), Counter-democracy: Politics in an age of distrust, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Rosanvallon P. (2011), Democratic legitimacy, impartiality, reflexivity, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Sassatelli R., Santoro M. and Semi G. (2015), Fronteggiare la crisi. Come cambia lo stile di vita del ceto medio, Bologna: il Mulino.

Sclavi M. (2002), Avventure urbane. Progettare la città con gli abitanti, Milano: Eleuthera.

Schudson M. (1998), The good citizen: A history of American civic life. New York: Martin Kessler Books.

Simmel G. (1997) [1911], La socievolezza, Roma: Armando.

Warren A.M., A. Sulaiman and N.I. Jaafar (2014), “Social media effects on fostering online civic engagement and building citizen trust and trust in institutions”, Government Information Quarterly, 31(2): 291–301. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.11.007.

Wellman B., A. Quan Haase, J. Witte and K. Hampton (2001), “Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment”, American Behavioral Scientist, 45: 436–455.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.