آموزش وردپرس ساخت اپلیکیشن

What We Talk about When We Talk about 'Local' Participation in International Biodiversity Law. The Changing Scope of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities' Participation under the Convention on Biological Diversity


Abstract


This article explores the meaning of participation by indigenous peoples and local communities' in the Decisions of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) from the perspectives of civic and radical environmentalism. The first sees participation as key for just and effective decision-making. Radical environmentalism argues instead for fundamental transformation to address environmental crisis. The article contributes to discussions about the importance of indigenous peoples and local communities for better and more just policies, or whether a more radical approach is necessary. The research uses empirical findings to deepen our understanding of 'local' participation under the CBD and uncovers many meanings. Most describe mechanisms for participation, suggesting scope for civic environmentalism. Yet a closer look raises a range of questions, leading to suggestions for future action and research.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v11i3p743

Keywords: Participation, Environmental governance, Convention on Biological Diversity, Indigenous peoples, Local communities, Civic environmentalism

References


Affolder, N. (2017), “Non-state actors”, in E. Morgera and J. Razzaque, J. (eds.), Ency-clopedia of Environmental Law: Biodiversity and Nature Protection Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 387–398.

Agrawal, A. (1995), “Dismantling the Divide between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge”, Development and Change, 26(3): 413-439.

Agrawal, A. (2002), “Indigenous knowledge and the politics of classification”, Interna-tional Social Science Journal, 54(1): 287-297.

Agrawal, A. and C. Gibson (1991), “Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation”, World Development, 27(4): 629-649.

Agrawal, A. and K. Gupta (2005), “Decentralisation and Participation: The Governance of Common Pool Resources in Nepal’s Terai”, World Development, 33(7): 1101-1114.

Ajavon, A., P. Newman, A. R. Ravishakara, J. A. Pyle, J. F. Bornman, N. D. Paul, X. Tang, S. T. Andersen, L. J. M. Kuijpers and

M. Pizano (2011), Synthesis Report of the 2010 Assessment of the Montreal Protocol Assessment Panels, UN Doc. UNEP/OzL.Pro.WG.1/31/3 (2011).

Bäckstrand, K. and E. Lövbrand (2016), “The Road to Paris: Contending Climate Governance Discourses in the Post-Copenhagen Era”, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2016.1150777.

Bavikatte, K. (2014), Stewarding the Earth: Rethinking Property and the Emergence of Biocultural Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bavikatte, K. and D. F. Robinson (2011), “Towards a People’s History of the Law: Biocultural Jurisprudence and the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing”, Law, Environment and Development Journal, 7(1): 37-51.

Bayrak, M.M., T. N. Tu and P. Burgers (2013), “The socio-cultural impact of the forest land allocation program on the indigenous Co Tu people in Central Vietnam”, Journal of Political Ecology, 20: 37–52.

Benford, R. D. D. A. Snow (2000), “Framing processes and social movements: an over-view and assessment”, Annual Review of Sociology, 611-639.

Birnie, P., A. Boyle and C. Redgewell (2009), International Law and the Environment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bixler, R., J. Dell-Angelo, O. Mfune and H. Roba (2015), “The Political Ecology of Partici-patory Conservation: Institutions and Discourse”, Journal of Political Ecology, 22: 164-182.

Boyle, A. (1994), “The Convention on Biological Diversity”, in L. Campiglio, L. Pineschi, D. Siniscalco and T. Treves (eds.), The Environment After Rio: International Law and Economics, London: Kluwer.

Bowman, M., P. Davies and C. Redgwell (2010), Lysters International Wildlife Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brand, U. and A. B. M. Vadrot (2013), “Epistemic Selectivities and the Valorisation of Nature: the Case of the Nagoya Protocol and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and the Ecosystem Services (IPBES)”, Law, Environment and Development Journal, 9(2): 202-220.

Caruso, L. (2015), “Theories of the Political Process, Political Opportunities Structure and Local Mobilizations. The Case of Italy”, Sociologica, IX(3), doi: 10.2383/82471.

Choudry, A. A. and D. Kapoor (2013), NGOization: complicity, contradictions and pro-spects, London: Zed Books.

Colchester, M. (2004), “Conservation Policy and Indigenous Peoples”, Cultural Survival Quarterly, 28(1): 17-22.

De Chastonay, A. C. (2018), Like-Minded Megadiverse Countries, Community-Based Rights and the International Governance of Biodiversity. Doctoral thesis, University of Lausanne.

De Nardis, F. (2014), “The Logical Structures of Comparison: Its Forms, Styles, Prob-lems, and the Role of History in Social and Political Research”, Participation and Con-flict, 7(3): 576-615.

Dowie, M. (2011), Conservation Refugees: The Hundred-Year Conflict Between Global Conservation and Native Peoples, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Dryzek, J. (2005), The Politics of the Earth Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fraser, N. (2000), “Rethinking Recognition”, New Left Review, 3: 107-120.

Fukuyama, F. (2012), The drive for dignity, January 13, 2012, retrieved 22 October 2018, (https://www.npr.org/2012/01/13/145157969/foreign-policy-the-struggle-for-dignity).

Gamson, W. A. (1985), “Goffman’s Legacy to Political Sociology”, Theory and Society, 14: 605.

Gellers, J. (2015), “Greening Critical Discourse Analysis: applications to the study of environmental law”, Critical Discourse Studies, 12(4): 482-493.

Guzman, A. T. (2002), “A Compliance-Based Theory of International Law”, California Law Review, 90(6): 1823-1887.

Gilbert, J. (2016), Indigenous Peoples’ Land Rights under International Law, Leiden, Boston: Brill Nijhoff.

Jacquot, S. And T. Vitale (2014), “Law as Weapon of the Weak? A Comparative Analysis of Legal Mobilization by Roma and Women’s Groups at the European Level”, Journal of European Public Policy, 21(4): 587-604.

Jonas, H. D., E. Lee, H. C. Jonas, C. Matallana-Toboon, K. Sander Wright, F. Nelson and E. Enns (2017), “Will ‘Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures’ Increase Recognition and Support for ICCA?”, PARKS 23(2): 63-78.

Jonas, H. (2017) “The Evolution of Indigenous Peoples’ and Community Conserved Territories and Areas (ICCAs) in International Biodiversity Law and Conservation Policy”, in E. Morgera and J. Razzaque (edsl), Encyclopaedia of Environmental Law: Biodiversity and Nature Protection Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Kaldor, M. (2003), Global Civil Society: An Answer to War, Cambridge: Polity Press

Keck, M.E. and K. Sikkink (1998), Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in inter-national politics. Ithaca, N.Y.; London: Cornell University Press.

Koester, V. (1997), “The Biodiversity Convention Process: Some Comments on the Outcome”, Environmental Policy and Law, 27(3): 175-191.

Koot, S., W. van Beek and J. Diemer (2016), “The Khwe of Namibia. Foragers between game, tourism and politics”, Anthropos, 111(2): 497-511.

Martin, A. (2017), Just Conservation: Biodiversity, Wellbeing and Sustainability, Oxon, New York: Routledge.

Metz, D., O. R. Davidson, P. R. Bosch and R. Dave (eds.) (2007), Contributions of Work-ing Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Morgera, E. (2017), “Under the Radar: Fair and Equitable Benefit-sharing and the hu-man rights of indigenous peoples and local communities related to natural re-sources”, BENELEX Working Paper N.10, revised January 2017, retrieved 7 February 2019, (https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2887803).

Morgera, E. (2018), “Dawn of a New Day? The Evolving Relationship between the Convention on Biological Diversity and International Human Rights Law”, BENELEX Working Paper N.17, revised 18 November 2018, retrieved 7 February 2019, (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3273997).

Morgera, E., M. Buck and E. Tsioumani (2014), Unraveling the Nagoya Protocol: A Commentary on the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing to the Conven-tion on Biological Diversity, Leiden, Boston: Brill.

Natarajan, U. and K. Khoday (2014), “Locating Nature: Making and unmaking interna-tional law”, Leiden Journal of International Law, 27(3): 573-593.

Nelson, F. (ed.) (2010), Community Rights, Conservation and Contested Land: The Politics of Natural Resource Governance in Africa, London, New York: Earthscan.

Nelson, F. and A. Agrawal (2008), “Patronage or Participation? Community-based Natural Resource Management Reform in Sub-Saharan Africa”, Development and Change 39(4): 557-585.

Parks, L. (2018a), “Spaces for local voices? A discourse analysis of the decisions of the Convention on Biological Diversity”, Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 9(2): 141-170.

Parks, L. (2018b), “Challenging power from the bottom up? Community protocols, benefit-sharing, and the challenge of dominant discourses”, Geoforum, 88: 87-95.

Paudel, N. S. (2006) “Protected Areas and the Reproduction of Social Inequality”, Policy Matters, 14: 155-169.

Pickerill, J. (2008), “From wilderness to Wild Country: the power of language in envi-ronmental campaigns in Australia”, Environmental Politics, 17(1): 95-104.

Poirier, R. and D. Ostergren (2002), “Evicting People from Nature: Indigenous Land Rights and National Parks in Australia, Russia and the United States”, Natural Re-sources Journal, 42(2): 331-351

Prost, M. and A. T. Camprubí (2012), “Against Fairness? International Environmental Law, Disciplinary Bias, and Pareto Justice”, Leiden Journal of International Law, 25(2): 379-396.

Redford, K. (1991), “The Ecological Noble Savage”, Cultural Survival Quarterly, 15(1): 46-48.

Reimerson, E. (2013), “Between Nature and Culture: exploring space for indigenous agency in the Convention on Biological Diversity”, Environmental Politics, 22(6): 992-1009.

Riseth, J. Å. (2007), “An Indigenous perspective on national parks and Sámi reindeer management in Norway”, Geographical Research, 45(2): 177-185.

Robinson, D. F. (2015), Biodiversity, access and benefit-sharing: global case studies, Abingdon: Earthscan from Routledge.

Sands, P. and J. Peel (2012), Principles of International Environmental Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sconfienza, U. (2017), The politics of environmental narratives, Doctoral thesis, Tilburg University.

Schön, D. A. and M. Rein (1994), Frame Reflection, New York: Basic Books.

Secretariat of the CBD (2010), Third Global Biodiversity Outlook 3, retrieved 7 February 2019, (https://www.cbd.int/gbo3/).

Secretariat of the UNCCD (2011), Land and Soil in the Context of a Green Economy for Sustainable Development, Food Security and Poverty Eradication, retrieved 7 February 2019, (http://catalogue.unccd.int/850_Rio_6_pages_english.pdf).

Sen, A. (2007), Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny, London: Penguin.

Shackleton, S., B. Campbell, E. Wollenberg and D. Edmunds (2002), “Devolution and community-based natural resource management: Creating space for local peoples to participate and benefit”, Natural Resouce Perspectives, 76, London: Overseas Development Institute. Retrieved 7 February 2019 (https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/2811.pdf).

Suiseeya, K. R. M. (2014), “Negotiating the Nagoya Protocol: Indigenous Demands for Justice”, Global Environmental Politics, 14(3): 102-124.

van der Heijden, H-A. (2008), “Green governmentality, ecological modernisation or civic environmentalism? Dealing with global environmental problems”, Environmental Politics, 17(5): 835-839.

Vermeylen, S. (2013), “The Nagoya Protocol and Customary Law: The Paradox of Narratives in the Law”, Law, Environment and Development Journal 9(2): 185-201.

Vitale, T. (2015), “Comment on Loris Caruso/4. Territorial Conflicts and New Forms of Left-Wing Political Organization: from Political Opportunity Structure to Structural Contexts of Opportunities”, Sociologica, IX(3), (doi: 10.2383/82475).


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.