On the  -comparison algebra of a class of singular Sturm-Liouville expressions on the real line
-comparison algebra of a class of singular Sturm-Liouville expressions on the real line
Abstract
In this article we study a  -comparison algebra in the sense of [C2] with generators related to the ordinary differential expression H on the full real line R where,with constants
-comparison algebra in the sense of [C2] with generators related to the ordinary differential expression H on the full real line R where,with constants  , (1.1) (Error rendering LaTeX formula) More precisely, the algebra, called
, (1.1) (Error rendering LaTeX formula) More precisely, the algebra, called  , is generated by the multiplications
, is generated by the multiplications  , by functions
, by functions ![a(x)∈ C([-∈fty,+∈fty])](http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/plugins/generic/latexRender/cache/4bf69a9089e497f2af147698034eceac.png) and the (singular integral) operators(Error rendering LaTeX formula),and their adjoints. Here
  and the (singular integral) operators(Error rendering LaTeX formula),and their adjoints. Here  , the inverse positive square root of the unique self-adjoint realization H of the expression (1.1), in the Hilbert space
, the inverse positive square root of the unique self-adjoint realization H of the expression (1.1), in the Hilbert space  .(We use the same notation for both, (1.1) and its realization.) The case of
 .(We use the same notation for both, (1.1) and its realization.) The case of  was discussed earlier in [Tg1], even for all n-dimensional problem. The commutators are compact and the Fredholm properties of operators in
 was discussed earlier in [Tg1], even for all n-dimensional problem. The commutators are compact and the Fredholm properties of operators in  are determined by a complex-valued symbol on a symbol space homeomorphic to that of the usual Laplace comparison algebra on
 are determined by a complex-valued symbol on a symbol space homeomorphic to that of the usual Laplace comparison algebra on  , although the symbol itself is calculated by different formulas.
, although the symbol itself is calculated by different formulas.
		 -comparison algebra in the sense of [C2] with generators related to the ordinary differential expression H on the full real line R where,with constants
-comparison algebra in the sense of [C2] with generators related to the ordinary differential expression H on the full real line R where,with constants  , (1.1) (Error rendering LaTeX formula) More precisely, the algebra, called
, (1.1) (Error rendering LaTeX formula) More precisely, the algebra, called  , is generated by the multiplications
, is generated by the multiplications  , by functions
, by functions ![a(x)∈ C([-∈fty,+∈fty])](http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/plugins/generic/latexRender/cache/4bf69a9089e497f2af147698034eceac.png) and the (singular integral) operators(Error rendering LaTeX formula),and their adjoints. Here
  and the (singular integral) operators(Error rendering LaTeX formula),and their adjoints. Here  , the inverse positive square root of the unique self-adjoint realization H of the expression (1.1), in the Hilbert space
, the inverse positive square root of the unique self-adjoint realization H of the expression (1.1), in the Hilbert space  .(We use the same notation for both, (1.1) and its realization.) The case of
 .(We use the same notation for both, (1.1) and its realization.) The case of  was discussed earlier in [Tg1], even for all n-dimensional problem. The commutators are compact and the Fredholm properties of operators in
 was discussed earlier in [Tg1], even for all n-dimensional problem. The commutators are compact and the Fredholm properties of operators in  are determined by a complex-valued symbol on a symbol space homeomorphic to that of the usual Laplace comparison algebra on
 are determined by a complex-valued symbol on a symbol space homeomorphic to that of the usual Laplace comparison algebra on  , although the symbol itself is calculated by different formulas.
, although the symbol itself is calculated by different formulas.DOI Code:
		 10.1285/i15900932v11p93
		
		Full Text: PDF


