Multisensory Opera: Enhancing the Senses for and with Persons with Visual Disabilities


Abstract


Opera has long been a significant part of Italy’s musical heritage, with its arias echoing around the globe for over two centuries. However, the availability of accessible operas for individuals with visual disabilities is a much more recent phenomenon, in Italy and Europe. Nonetheless, the response to these accessible performances has always been positive and continues to grow. This article focuses initially on a shift in perspective in the concepts of disability, accessibility, and inclusion, as reflected in international legislation and directives, as well as in practical implementations of accessibility. The article then moves on to analyze experiences of inclusive design for accessible opera performances and related activities, where blind and sighted individuals collaborate for mutual benefit and empowerment. Central to this discussion are the notions of participation and inclusion, alongside theories of action research. In its final section, the article presents findings from surveys aimed at assessing the enhanced well-being and empowerment of individuals with visual disabilities who have actively engaged in the co-design of accessible operas.


Keywords: accessible opera; action research; creative AD writing; empowerment; inclusion.

References


Benecke B. 2004, Audio Description, in “Meta” 49 [1], pp. 78-80. https://doi.org/10.7202/009022ar

Burton D. F. 2005, A History of Opera: Milestones and Metamorphoses, Opera Journeys Publishing.

Calhoun E. F. 2019, Action Research for Systemic Change in Education, in Mertiler, C. A. (ed.), The Wiley Handbook of Action Research in Education, Wiley Blackwell, New York, pp. 415-438.

Charlton J. C. 2000, Nothing About Us Without Us, University of California Press, Berkeley.

Dallago L. 2012, Che cos’è l’empowerment, Carocci, Roma.

Di Giovanni E. 2018, Participatory Accessibility: Creating Audio Description with Blind and Non-Blind Children, in “Journal of Audiovisual Translation” 1, pp. 155-169. https://doi.org/10.47476/jat.v1i1.50

Di Giovanni E. 2022, Inclusive Theatre-Making: Participation, Empowerment and Well-Being, in “inTRAlinea. On Line Translation Journal” 1, pp. 1-26. https://www.intralinea.org/specials/article/2609

Di Giovanni E., Fryer L. and Raffi F. 2023, Collaborative Media Accessibility. Actors on the Collaborative Stage, in “I-LanD Journal” 1, pp. 3-11. https://dx.doi.org/10.26379/IL2023001_001

Gatti Casazza G. 2022, Memories of the Opera, Ouverture Publishing, Richmond.

Gossett A., Mirza M., Barnds A. and Feidt D. 2009, Beyond Access: A Case Study on the Intersection Between Accessibility, Sustainability, and Universal Design, in “Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology” 4 [6], pp. 439-450. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483100903100301

Grassini A., Socrati A. and Trasatti A. 2018, L’arte contemporanea e la scoperta della tattilità, Armando Editore.

Greco C. and Dubini P. 2024, La Cultura è di Tutti, Egea, Milano.

Heron J. and Reason P. 2006, The Practice of Co-Operative Inquiry: Research with, Rather than on People, in Reason P. and Bradbury H. (eds.), Handbook of Action Research, SAGE, London, pp. 144-154.

Kruger J. L. and Orero P. 2010, Audio Description, Audio Narration – A New Era in AVT, in Perspectives. Studies on Translation Theory and Practice, 18 [3], pp. 141-142.

Matamala A. and Orero P. 2007, Designing a Course on Audio Description: Main Competences of the Future Professional, in “Linguistica Antverpiensia – New Series” 6, pp. 329-344. https://doi.org/10.52034/lanstts.v6i.195

Mertler C. A. (ed.) 2019, The Wiley Handbook of Action Research in Education, Wiley Blackwell, New York.

Minors H. 2020, Opera and Intercultural Musicology as Modes of Translation, in Serban A. and Kar Yue Chan K. (eds.), Opera in Translation. Unity in Diversity, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 13-34.

Nario Redmond M. 2019, Ableism: the Causes and Consequences of Disability Prejudice, Wiley, New York.

Oliver M. 2013, The Social Model of Disability: Thirty Years On, in “Disability & Society” 28 [7], pp. 1024-1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.818773.

Park P. 2006, Knowledge and Participatory Research, in Reason P. and Bradbury H. (eds.), Handbook of Action Research, SAGE, London, pp. 83-93.

Pasmore W. 2006, Action Research in the Workplace: A Socio-Technical Perspective, in Reason P. and Bradbury H. (eds.), Handbook of Action Research, SAGE, London, pp. 38-48.

Romero Fresco P. 2021, Creative Media Accessibility: Placing the Focus Back on the Individual, in Antona M. and Stephanidis C. (eds.), Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Access to Media, Learning and Assistive Environments, Springer, Cham, pp. 291-307.

Waller S. D. and Clarkson P. J. 2009, Tools For Inclusive Design, in Stephanidis C. (ed.), The Universal Access Handbook, CRC Press, London/New York, pp. 1-14.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A. and Tellegen, A. 1988, Development and Validation of Brief Measure of Positive and Negative Affect: the PANAS Scales, in “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology” 54, pp. 1063-1070.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4 ویزای استارتاپ

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.