Email this article Framing diversity in teen drama: Streaming series as a case study for social and discursive constructions
Abstract
Concepts of inclusivity and diversity are socially and discursively constructed through a variety of contexts, including televisual/streaming series. Undoubtedly, televisual/streaming products strongly impact how individuals (especially younger generations; Trudgill 1986, Bednarek 2017) are exposed to and have experience with construed situations, since they broaden the range of different positions in contexts. In fact, certain themes are problematized in dramas and are successively negotiated in dialogues, favoring different viewpoints and attitudes. In ongoing screen interactions, therefore, the audience participates in the enactment and alignment of meanings that challenge the different representations of reality (Dewulf and Bouwen 2012, Bednarek 2018). In the context of the socio-political input that favours inclusivity, this paper investigates the type of diversity that is framed and in what way it is negotiated within fictional interactions in teen drama. The analytical tools of Critical Discourse Studies are combined with the interaction-oriented ones to investigate the discursive strategies of identity constructions in interaction (Stamou 2018). Exchanges from three American teen dramas, representing the audiovisual experience that would best fit the age group of adolescents, are investigated to explore fictionalization within and throughout dialogues, and to study how specific identities are constructed (as in normalized/accepted/rejected), and what discourses are drawn for these constructions. Results show that some differences in how specific (stereotypical) identities are treated occur and that certain exchanges in dialogues strategically sustain, support or reject particular messages about diversity to frame “group identity” meanings.
References
Baxter S. 2012, Watching High School: Representing Disempowerment on Teen Drama Television, The University of Western Ontario (Canada) ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. “Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository”, 644.
Bednarek M. 2017, (Re-)circulating popular television: Audience engagement and corporate practices, in Mortensen J., N. Coupland, and J. Thorgersen (eds), Style, Mediation and Change: Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Talking Media, OUP, Oxford, pp. 115-140.
Bednarek M. 2017, The role of dialogue in fiction, in Locher M. and Jucker A.H. (eds), Pragmatics of Fiction, de Gruyter Mouton, Berlin/New York, pp. 129-158.
Bednarek M. 2018, Language and Television Series. A linguistic Approach to TV Dialogues, CUP, Cambridge.
Berridge S. 2012, Raised Voices: Homophobic Abuse as a Catalyst for Coming Out in US Teen Television Drama Series, in Ross K. (ed), The handbook of gender, sex and the media, Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 313-326.
Birchall C. 2004, “Feels like Home”: Dawson’s Creek, nostalgia, & the young adult viewer, in Davis G. and Dickinson K. (eds.), Teen TV: Genre, consumption & identity, British Film Institute, London, pp. 176-189.
Bruti S. 2015, Teaching the Use of Pragmatic Routines through Audiovisual Material, in Crawford Camiciottoli B. and Fortanet-Gómez I. (eds.), Multimodal Analysis in Academic Settings. From Research to Teaching, Routledge, London/New York, pp. 213- 236.
Bucholtz M. and Hall K. 2008, All of the above: New coalitions in sociocultural linguistics, in “Journal of Sociolinguistics” 12(4), pp. 401–431.
Clark C. 1969, Television and social controls: Some observation of the portrayal of ethnic minorities, in “Television Quarterly” 8(2), pp. 1969, 18-22.
Cook C. 2018, A content analysis of LGBT representation on broadcast and streaming television. Honors Theses. https://scholar.utc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1133&context=honors-theses
D’Cruz M. 2015, The Vampire Diaries: an analysis of a genre and representations of women. A Mini thesis, Monash University, Malaysia. Retrieved at: https://www.academia.edu/49343857/The_Vampire_Diaries_An_Analysis_of_Genre_and_Representations_of_Women
Davis G. and Dickinson K. 2004, Teen TV: Genre, Consumption, Identity, BFI Pub, London.
Dewulf A. and Bouwen R. 2012, Issue Framing in Conversation for Change: Discursive interaction strategies for “Doing Differences”, in “The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science” 48(2), pp. 168-193.
Dhoest A. 2015, Contextualising diversity in TV drama. Policies, Practices and Discourses, in “International Journal of TV Serial Narratives” 1(2), pp. 169-180.
Eckert P. 1988, Adolescent social structure and the spread of linguistic change, in “Language in Society” 17(2), 183-207.
Eckert P. 2003, Language and Adolescent Peer Groups, in “Journal of Language and Social Psychology” 22(1), pp.112-118.
Eckert P. 2008, Variation and the indexical field, in “Journal of Sociolinguistics” 12, pp. 453–76.
Hart K. P. 2000, Representing Gay Men on American Television, in “The Journal of Men’s Studies” 9 (1), pp. 59–79. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.0901.59
Hudelet A. and Crémieux A. (eds) 2021, Exploring Seriality on Screen: Audiovisual Narratives in Film and Television, Routledge, London.
Innocenti V. and Pescatore G. 2015, Changing Series: Narrative Models and the Role of the Viewer in Contemporary Television Seriality, in “Between” 4 (8). https://doi.org/10.13125/2039-6597/4.
Jucker A. H. and Locher M. A. 2017, Introducing Pragmatics of Fiction: Approaches, trends and developments, in Locher M.A. and Jucker A.H. (eds), Pragmatics of Fiction, De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin, Boston, pp. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431094-001
Kendal Z. and Kendal E. 2017, Consent is Sexy: Gender, Sexual Identity and Sex Positivism in MTV’s Young Adult Television Series Teen Wolf (2011–), in “Monash University Journal contribution”. https://doi.org/10.4225/03/59240d6cbd9b4
Martikainen J. 2022, Membership categorization analysis as means of studying person perception, in “Qualitative Research in Psychology” 19(3), pp. 703-721, DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1794089
Piazza R., Bednarek M. and Rossi F. (eds.) 2011, Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Piazza R. 2022, Ideology in the multimodal discourse of television documentaries on Irish travellers’ and gypsies’ communities in the UK, in Hoffmann C. and Kirner-Ludwig M. (eds.), Telecinematic Stylistics, Bloomsbury Academic, London, pp. 113–140. Accessed October 24, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350042889.0011.
Rawls A.W. and David G. 2005, Accountably other: Trust, reciprocity and exclusion in a context of situated practice, in “Human Studies” 28(4), pp. 469-97.
Reisigl M. and Wodak R. 2001, Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism, Routledge, London.
Smith S., Pieper K., Choueiti M., Yao K., Case A., Hernandez K. and Moore Z. 2021, Inclusion in Netflix Original U.S. Scripted Series & Films, USC Annenberg https://www.readkong.com/page/inclusion-in-netflix-original-u-s-scripted-series-films-3857805
Stamou A. 2018, Studying the interactional construction of identities in Critical Discourse Studies: A Proposed analytical framework, in “Discourse and Society” 29 (5), pp. 569-589.
Stubbe M., Lane C., Hilder J., Vine E., Vine B., Marra M., Holmes J., and Weatherall A. 2003. Multiple Discourse Analyses of a Workplace Interaction, in “Discourse Studies”, 5(3), pp. 351–388.
Tagliamonte S. 2018, Teen Talk. The language of Adolescents, CUP, Cambridge.
Trudgill P. 1986, Dialects in contact, Blackwell, London.
Van Dijk T.A. 1998, Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach, SAGE, London.
Van Leeuwen T. 1996, The representation of social actors, in Caldas Coulthard C.R. and Coulthard M. (eds), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, Routledge, London, pp. 32–70.
Vignozzi G. 2020, Multiple G.S.WS to the chest. B.P. 90 Over 60. Pulse in the 120s. Push 1 of Epi!” A preliminary study on the representation of spoken medical English in Grey’s Anatomy, in “Lingue e Linguaggi” 40, pp. 187-209.
William R. 2013, Unlocking the Vampire Diaries: genres, authorship and quality in Teen TV Horror, in “Gothic Studies”, 15 (1).
Żerebecki, B. G., Opree, S. J., Hofhuis, J., and Janssen S. 2021, Can TV shows promote acceptance of sexual and ethnic minorities? A literature review of television effects on diversity attitudes, in “Sociology Compass” 15(8), e12906. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12906
Full Text: PDF
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
