Email this article “Such stuff as ‘texts’ are made on”. Digital Materialities and (Hyper)editing in The Internet Shakespeare Edition of ‘King Lear’
Abstract
Against the background of increasingly pervasive digital technologies, much scholarly attention has been attracted, over the last few decades, by the impact of digital tools and resources in the field of Shakespearean textual studies, where several issues are still open to debate (Erne 2021; Estill 2019; Lavagnino 2014; Malone, Greatley-Hirsch 2021; Greatley-Hirsch, Jenstad 2016; Massai 2021). In the light of a radical rethinking of the ‘materiality’ of the text, this article more specifically addresses some of the affordances, as well as the possible dangers and prospects of digital scholarly editions of the playwright’s works. Focusing on Michael Best’s Internet Shakespeare Edition of King Lear (2001) as a remarkable case in point, the article illustrates how print-based views of textual transmission and editorial mediation are radically reconceptualized within an interactive environment (Driscoll, Pierazzo 2016) where readers are allowed to navigate across the diverse textual variants of the play, including old-spelling transcriptions of the early witnesses, and to access a huge amount of multimedia materials available at the click of the mouse (Best 2011). Considering the paradigm shift from ‘editing’ to ‘archiving’ (Desmet 2017; Galey 2014) and the more recent expansion of platforms hosting interoperable digital humanities projects (Jenstad et al. 2018; Malone, Greatley-Hirsch 2021), the article eventually illustrates how, in the wake of Best’s pioneering model, a digital edition of King Lear could be further enhanced with dynamic links to other interoperable resources and tools. Their still partly unexplored hermeneutic potential invites reflection on how the affordances of the digital medium affect our engagement with and understanding of Shakespeare’s textual heritage.
References
Apollon D. and Bélisle C. 2014, The Digital Fate of the Critical Apparatus, in Apollon D., Bélisle C. and Régnier P. (eds.), Digital Critical Editions, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Chicago/Springfield, pp. 81-113.
Bate J. 1997, The Arden Shakespeare on CD-ROM: Text and Sources from Shakespeare Studies, Routledge, London.
Best M. 2001, Textual Introduction to King Lear, in Internet Shakespeare Editions. https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/doc/Lr_TextIntro/section/General%20editorial%20principles/index.html (15.07.2021).
Best M. 2007, Shakespeare and the Electronic Text, in Murphy A. (ed.), A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text, Blackwell, Malden, pp. 145-61.
Best M. 2009, Standing in Rich Place: Electrifying the Multiple-Text Edition Or, Every Text is Multiple, in “College Literature” 36 [1], pp. 26-39.
Best M. 2011, Shakespeare on the Internet and in Digital Media, in Burnett M. and Streete A. (eds.), The Edinburgh Companion to Shakespeare and the Arts, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 558-576.
Blayney P.W. 1982, The Texts of ‘King Lear’ and their Origins. Volume 1: Nicholas Okes and the First Quarto, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Bolter J.D. 1991, The Writing Space. The Computer, Hypertext and the History of Writing, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (N.J.), Hove, London.
Bolter J.D. and Grusin R. 1999, Remediation. Understanding New Media, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).
Buzzoni, M. 2016, A Protocol for Scholarly Digital Editions? The Italian Point of View, in Driscoll M.J. and Pierazzo E. (eds.), Digital Scholarly Editing, Theories and Practice, Openbook Publishers, Cambridge, pp. 59-82.
Carlin C., Czaykowska-Higgins E., Jenstad J. and Grove-White E. 2016, The Endings Project. http://projectendings.github.io (15.07.2021).
Carson C. and Bratton J. (eds.) 2000, Cambridge King Lear CD-ROM: Text and Performance Archive, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Carson C. 2006, The Evolution of Online Editing, in Holland P. (ed.), Editing Shakespeare “Shakespeare Survey” 59, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 168-181.
Cerquiglini B. 1999, Éloge de la variante: Histoire critique de la philologie, Seuil, Paris; trans. by B. Wing 1999, Praise of the Variant: A Cultural History of Philology, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Chartier R. 1995, Forms and Meanings: Texts Performances and Audiences Form Codes to Computer, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
Cockett P. 2009, Performing the Queen’s Men: A Project in Theatre Historiography in Ostovich H., Schott Syme H., Griffin A. (eds) 2009, Locating the Queen’s Men 1583-1603, Material Practices and Conditions of Playing, Ashgate, Farnham, pp. 229-242.
Dawson A.B. 2008, What Do Editors Do and What does it Matter?, in Maguire L. (ed.), How to Do Things with Shakespeare, Blackwell, Oxford/New York, pp. 160-180.
Deegan M. and Sutherland K. 2009, Transferred Illusions. Digital Technology and the Forms of Print, Ashgate, Farnham.
De Grazia M. and Stallybrass P. 1993, The Materiality of the Shakespearean Text, in “Shakespeare Quarterly” 44 [3], pp. 255-283.
Derrida J., 1995, Mal d’archive. Une Impression freudienne, Editions Galilée, Paris; trans. by Prenowitz E. 1996, Archive Fever, A Freudian Impression 1996, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Desmet C. 2017, The Art of Curation: Searching for Global Shakespeares in the Digital Archives, in “Borrowers and Lenders” IX [1]. http://www.borrowers.uga.edu/783934/show (15.07.2021).
Dillen W. 2019, On Edited Archives and Archived Editions, in “International Journal of Digital Humanities” 1, pp. 263-277.
Drakakis J. 2007, Afterword, in Murphy A. (ed.), A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford/New York, pp. 221-238.
Driscoll M.J. and Pierazzo E. (eds.) 2016, Digital Scholarly Editing, Theories and Practice, Openbook Publishers, Cambridge.
Eggert P. 2005, Text-encoding, Theories of the Text, and the “Work-Site”, in “Literary and Linguistic Computing” 20, pp. 425–35.
Eisenstein E. 1979, The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early-Modern Europe, 2 vols., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Erne L. 2008, Shakespeare’s Modern Collaborators, Bloomsbury Continuum, London.
Erne L. 2021, Introduction, in Erne L. (ed.), The Arden Research Handbook of Shakespeare and Textual Studies, Bloomsbury, London/New York, pp. 1-20.
Erne L. and Kidnie M.J. (eds.) 2004, Textual Performances. The Modern Reproduction of Shakespeare’s Drama, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Estill L. and Silva A. 2018, Storing and Accessing Knowledge: Digital Tools for the Study of Early Modern Drama, in Jenstad J., Kaethler M. and Roberts-Smith J. (eds.), Shakespeare’s Language in Digital Media. Old Words, New Tools, Routledge, London/New York, pp. 131-143.
Estill L. 2019, Digital Humanities’ Shakespeare Problem, in “Humanities”, Special Issue Shakespeare and Digital Humanities: New Perspectives and Future Directions, 8 [45], pp. 1-16. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/8/1/45 (15.07.2021).
Fazel V.M. and Geddes L. 2017, The Shakespeare User. Critical and Creative Appropriations in a Networked Culture, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Finkelstein D. and McCleery A. 2013, An Introduction to Book History [2005], Routledge, London/New York.
Fraistat N. and Flanders J. 2013, Introduction. Textual Scholarship in the Age of Media Consciousness, in Fraistat N. and Flanders J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Textual Scholarship, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-15.
Galey A. 2014, The Shakespearean Archive. Experiments in New Media from the Renaissance to Postmodernity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Galey A. 2016, Five Ways to Improve the Conversation about Digital Scholarly Editing, in MLA Committee on Scholarly Editions. https://scholarlyeditions.mla.hcommons.org/2016/08/01/five-ways-to-improve-the-conversation-about-digital-scholarly-editing/ (15.07.2021).
Gossett S. 2021, The Modern Editing of Shakespeare: The Apparatus, in Erne L. (ed.), The Arden Research Handbook of Shakespeare and Textual Studies, Bloomsbury, London/New York, pp. 206-224.
Greatley-Hirsch B. 2011, The Kingdom Has Been Digitized: Electronic Editions of Renaissance Drama and the Long Shadows of Shakespeare and Print, in “Literature Compass” 22 [8.9], pp. 568-591.
Greatley-Hirsch B. and Craig H. (eds.) 2014, ‘Mingled Yarn’: The State of Computing in Shakespeare 2.0, in Bishop T. and A. Huang (gen. eds.), B. Greatley-Hirsch and H. Craig (eds.) Shakespeare’s International Yearbook. Volume 14, Special Section, Digital Shakespeares, Routledge, London/New York, pp. 3-35.
Greatley-Hirsch B. and Jenstad J. 2016, Beyond the Text: Digital Editions and Performance, in “Shakespeare Bulletin” 34 [1], pp. 107-127.
Greatley-Hirsch B., Arneil S. and Newton G. 2009, “Mark the Play”: Electronic Editions of Shakespeare and Video Content, in “New Knowledge Environments” 1 [1]. https://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/download/279/525/ (15.07.2021).
Greenblatt S., Cohen W., Gossett S., Howard J., Maus K. and McMullan G. (gen. eds.) 2015a, The Norton Shakespeare, Third Edition, Norton, New York.
Greenblatt S., Cohen W., Gossett S., Howard J., Maus K. and McMullan G. (gen. eds.), 2015b, The Norton Shakespeare Digital Edition, Norton, New York.
Griffin A. 2018, Text, Performance, and Multidisciplinarity. On a digital edition of King Leir, in Jemstad J., Kaethler M. and Roberts-Smith J. (eds.), Shakespeare’s Language in Digital Media. Old Words, New Tools, Routledge, London/New York, pp. 84-104.
Holland P. (ed.) 2002, King Lear and Its Afterlife, in “Shakespeare Survey” 55, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hope J. and Witmore M. 2004, The Very Large Textual Object: A Prosthetic Reading of Shakespeare, in “Early Modern Literary Studies” 6, pp. 1-36.
Jenstad J. 2018, Tangled in a Net: Shakespeare the Adaptor/Shakespeare as Source, in Britton D.A. and Walter M. (eds.), Rethinking Shakespeare Source Study. Audience, Authors, and Digital Technologies, Routledge, New York/London, pp. 279-296.
Jenstad J., Kaethler M. and Roberts-Smith J. 2018, Introduction, in Jenstad J., Kaethler M. and Roberts-Smith J. (eds.), Shakespeare’s Language in Digital Media. Old Words, New Tools, Routledge, London/New York, pp. 1-8.
Knowles R., Donovan K. and Glatzer P. 2020, King Lear. A New Variorum Edition. Modern Language Association, New York.
Landow G.P. 1992, Hypertext 2.0. The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore/London.
Landow G.P. 1996, What’s a Critic to Do?, in Landow G.P. (ed.), Hyper/Text/Theory, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore/London, pp. 1-48.
Landow G.P. 2003, Hypertext 3.0. Critical Theory and New Media in an Era of Globalization, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore/London.
Lavagnino J. 2004, Two Varieties of Digital Commentary, in Erne L. and Kidnie M.J. (eds), Textual Performances. The Modern Reproduction of Shakespeare’s Drama, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 194-209.
Lavagnino J. 2014, Shakespeare in the Digital Humanities, in Carson C. and Kirwan P. (eds.), Shakespeare and the Digital World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 14-23.
Madrid R.I., Van Oostendorp H. and Puerta Melguizo M.C. 2009, The Effect of the Number of Links and Navigation Support on Cognitive Load and Learning with Hypertext: the Mediating Role of Reading Order, in “Computers in Human Behaviour” 25, pp. 66-75.
Malone T. and Greatley-Hirsch B. 2021, Digital Shakespeare, in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature 28, Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://oxfordre.com/literature/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.001.0001/acrefore-9780190201098-e-1192 (15.09.2021).
Marcus L. 1996, Unediting the Renaissance: Shakespeare, Marlowe and Milton, Routledge, London/New York.
Marcus L. 2007, Editing Shakespeare in a Postmodern Age, in Murphy A. (ed.), A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford/New York, pp. 128-144.
Massai S. 2004, Scholarly Editing in the Shift from Print to Electronic Cultures, in Erne L. and Kidnie M.J. (eds.), Textual Performances: The Modern Reproduction of Shakespeare’s Drama, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 94-108.
Massai S. 2021, Shakespeare and Digital Editions, in Erne L. (ed.), The Arden Research Handbook of Shakespeare and Textual Studies, London/New York, Bloomsbury, pp. 244-264.
McGann J. 2001, Radiant Textuality. Literature after the World Wide Web, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
McLeod R. 1982, UN Editing Shak-speare, in “Substance” 33/34, pp. 26-55.
McLuhan M. 1962, The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
McLuhan M. 1964, Understanding Media. The Extensions of Man, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Milne D. 2002, What becomes of the Broken-Hearted: ‘King Lear’ and the Dissociation of Sensibility”, in Holland P. (ed.), King Lear and Its Afterlife, “Shakespeare Survey” 55, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 53-66.
Murphy A. (ed.) 2007, A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford/New York.
Nelson T. 1981, Literary Machines, Mindful Press, Swarthmore (PA).
Ong W.J. 1982, Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word, Methuen, London.
Orgel S. 1981, What is a Text?, in “Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama” 25, pp. 3-6.
Orgel S. 1999, What is an Editor?, in Orgel S. and Keilen S. (eds.), Shakespeare and the Editorial Tradition, Garland, New York/London, pp. 117-123.
Ostovich H., Schott Syme H. and Griffin A. (eds) 2009, Locating the Queen’s Men 1583-1603, Material Practices and Conditions of Playing, Ashgate, Farnham.
Paul J.G. 2014, Shakespeare and the Imprints of Performance, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Pechter E. 2006, Crisis in Editing?, in Holland P. (ed.), Editing Shakespeare, “Shakespeare Survey” 59, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 20-38.
Pechter E. 2011, Shakespeare Studies Today, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Pettit T. 2012, Bracketing the Gutenberg Parenthesis, in “Explorations in Media Ecology” 11 [2], pp. 95-114.
Pierazzo E. 2014a, Digital Documentary Editions and Others, in “Scholarly Editing: The Annual of the Association for Documentary Editing” 35, pp. 1-23. http://wwwscholarlyediting.org/2014/essays/essay.pierazzo.html (15.07.2021).
Pierazzo E. 2014b, Digital Scholarly Editing: Theories, Models and Methods. https://hal.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/hal-01182162/document (15.07.2021).
Price K.M. 2009, Edition, Project, Database, Archive, Thematic Research Collection: What's in a Name?, in “Digital Humanities Quarterly” 3 [3]. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/3/000053/000053.html (15.07.2021).
Rasmussen K.S.G. 2016, Reading or Using a Digital Edition? Reader Roles in Scholarly Editions, in Driscoll M.J. and Pierazzo E. (eds.) 2016, Digital Scholarly Editing, Theories and Practice, Openbook Publishers, Cambridge, pp. 119-133.
Roberts-Smith J. et al. 2013, Visualizing Theatrical Text: From Watching the Script to the Simulated Environment for Theatre (SET), in “Digital Humanities Quarterly” 7 [3]. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/7/3/000166/000166.html (15.07.2021).
Sahle P. 2016, What is a Scholarly Digital Edition?, in Driscoll M.J. and Pierazzo E. (eds.), Digital Scholarly Editing, Theories and Practice, Openbook Publishers, Cambridge, pp. 19-39.
Sawday J. and Rhodes N. 2000, The Renaissance Computer, Knowledge Technology in the First Age of Print, Routledge, New York/London.
Shillingsburg P. 2006, From Gutenberg to Google. Electronic Representation of Literary Texts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Shillingsburg P. 2017, Textuality and Knowledge: Essays, The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park (PA).
Siemens R. 1998, Disparate Structures, Electronic and Otherwise: Conceptions of Textual Organisation in the Electronic Medium, with Reference to Electronic Editions of Shakespeare and the Internet, in “Early Modern Literary Studies” Special Issue 2, pp. 1-29. https://extra.shu.ac.uk/emls/03-3/siemshak.html (15.07.2021).
Siemens R. et al. 2015, A Social Edition of the Devonshire Manuscript (BLMS Add 17,492). https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/The_Devonshire_Manuscript (15.09.2021).
Siemens R., Elkink R., McColl A., Armstrong K., Dixon J., Saby A., Hirsch B. and Leitch C. 2011, Prototyping the Renaissance English Knowledgebase (REKn) and Professional Reading Environment (PReE), Past, Present, and Future Concerns: A Digital Humanities Project Narrative, in “Digital Studies/Le champ numérique” 2 [2], pp. 1-48.
Siemens, R., Leitch C., Garnett A., Koolen C., Timney M. with the ETCL, INKE and PKP Research Groups 2012, Toward Modelling the ‘Social’ Edition: An Approach to Understanding the Electronic Scholarly Edition in the Context of New and Emerging Social Media, in “Literary and Linguistic Computing” 27 [4], pp. 445- 461.
Squeo A. 2019, Visualizing Variants: Shakespeare’s Instability in Digital Media, in Ferrari R. and Soncini S. (eds.), Worlds of Words. Complexity, Creativity, Conventionality in English Language, Literature and Culture, Pisa University Press, Pisa, pp. 257-268.
Stone P.W.K. 1980, The Textual History of ‘King Lear’, Ashgate, Farnham.
Syme H. 6th September 2016, The Text is Foolish: Brian Vickers’s ‘The One King Lear’ in “Los Angeles Review of Books”. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/text-foolish-brian-vickerss-one-king-lear/# (15.09.2021).
Taylor G. and Egan G. (eds.) 2017, The New Oxford Shakespeare Authorship Companion, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Taylor G. and Warren M. (eds.) 1983, The Division of the Kingdoms: Shakespeare’s Two Versions of ‘King Lear’, Oxford Shakespeare Studies, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Taylor G., Jowett J., Bourus T. and Egan G. (gen. eds.) 2016-, The New Oxford Shakespeare (Digital). https://www.oxfordscholarlyeditions.com/nos (15.07.2021).
Taylor G., Jowett J., Bourus T. and Egan G. (gen. eds.) 2016, The New Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works: Modern Critical Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Taylor G., Jowett J., Bourus T. and Egan G. (gen. eds.) 2017, The New Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works: Critical Reference Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Taylor G., Jowett J., Bourus T. and Egan G. (gen. eds.) in press, The New Oxford Shakespeare. The Complete Alternative Versions, 2 vols., Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Treharne E. and Willan C. 2019, Text Technologies: A History, Stanford University Press, Redwood City.
Vickers B. 2016, The One King Lear, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA).
Young J. 2015, Considering the Scholarly Edition in the Digital Age, MLA Committee on Scholarly Editions. https://scholarlyeditions.mla.hcommons.org/2015/09/02/cse-white-paper (15.07.2021).
Warren M. (ed.) 1989, The Complete King Lear 1608-1623, The University of California Press.
Weis R. (ed.) 1993, King Lear, A Parallel Text Edition, Longman Annotated Texts, Longman, Harlow.
Wells S. 2016, Shakespeare on Page and Stage. Selected Essays. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Wells S. and Taylor G. 1986, The Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Werstine P. 2008, Past is Prologue: Electronic New Variorum Shakespeare, in “Shakespeare” 4 [3], pp. 224-225.
Websites and Tools
Complete Works of William Shakespeare (MIT) (1993-), created by Jeremy Hilton. http://shakespeare.mit.edu/ (15.07.2021).
DRE – Digital Renaissance Editions, coordinated by B. Greatley-Hirsch et al. https://digitalrenaissance.uvic.ca/ (15.07.2021).
Global Shakespeares Video and Performance Archive, directed by P. Donaldson. https://globalshakespeares.mit.edu/ (15.07.2021).
ISE – Internet Shakespeare Editions, edited by M. Best (emeritus co-ordinating editor) and J. Jenstad. https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/ (15.07.2021).
#LancsBox software version 6.0. June 2021, released by V. Brezina, P. Weill-Tessier and A. McEnery. http://corpora.lancs.ac.uk/lancsbox/ (15.07.2021).
LEMDO – Linked Early Modern Drama Online, co-ordinating editors J. Jenstad and B. Greatley-Hirsch. https://lemdo.uvic.ca/ (15.07.2021).
LEME – Lexicons of Early Modern English, edited by I. Lancashire. https://leme.library.utoronto.ca/ (15.07.2021).
MoEML – Map of Early Modern London, directed by J. Jenstad. http://mapoflondon.uvic.ca (02.10.2021).
OSS – Open Source Shakespeare: An Experiment in Literary Technology, directed by E. Johnson http://opensourceshakespeare.org (15.07.2021).
Richard Brome Online – general editor Richard Cave http://www.dhi.ac.uk/brome (15.07.2021).
SET – Simulated Environment for Theatre, directed by J. Roberts-Smith et al., http://www.arts.uwaterloo.ca/~j33rober/set.html (15.07.2021).
QME – the Queen’s Men Editions, general editor H. Ostovich. https://qme.uvic.ca/Foyer/historyofthequeensmen/index.html (15.07.2021).
Voyant Tools developed by S. Sinclair and G. Rockwell. https://voyant-tools.org (15.07.2021).
The Shakespeare Collection on Archives Unbound https://www.gale.com/intl/primary-sources/archives-unbound (15.07.2021).
Full Text: pdf
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
