Email this article “The whole of Bengal is in revolt”. A corpus based analysis of letters from the 1857-58 mutinies in India
Abstract
Letter-writing is an ancient practice which has attracted the attention of literary scholars and historians over the centuries, since it has had a crucial role not only in facilitating the development of states and empires but also in destroying them. Specifically, the desire of exchanging and establishing information networks as well as to the complexity of feelings reflected in these texts have attracted much interest whereas the linguistic features characterising personal letters have received limited attention by corpora analysts. The purpose of this paper is therefore to extend extant research by investigating the linguistic choices made in a corpus of letters written during the 1857-1858 mutinies in India. The methodology is mixed. After a quantitative analysis of the key words, their collocations, their repeated phraseology/clusters and the clusters’ recurring concordances, the emerging data is interpreted qualitatively with the integration of discourse analysis. The findings highlight how letters can be considered a hybrid genre in which the personal, the public, the historic and the social dimensions intertwine with reciprocal influence.
References
Altman J.G. 1982, Epistolarity: Approaches to a Form, Ohio State University Press, Ohio.
Andersson T. 1994, The existential conditions of place-names, in “Place-Names Worthy of Caring for”, Symposium Place-Name Culture organised by the National Heritage Board, Stockholm 5–7 May 1993, pp. 7–21.
Auer A., Shreier D. and Watts R.J. (eds) 2015, Letter Writing and Language Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Barton D. and Hall N. (eds.) 2000, Letter Writing as a Social Practice, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam.
Bhargava M.L. 1992, Saga of 1857: Success and Failures, Reliance Publishing House, New Delhi.
Blunt A. 2000, Embodying war: British women and domestic defilement in the Indian mutiny 1857–1858, in “Journal of Historical Geography” 26 [3], pp. 403-428.
Bondi, M. and Diani, G. 2015, I am wild about cabbage: evaluative ‘semantic sequences’ and cross-linguistic (dis)similarities, in “Nordic Journal of English Studies” 14[1], pp. 116-151.
Brownlees N., Del Lungo G. and Denton J. (eds.) 2010, The Language of Public and Private Communication in a Historical Perspective, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge.
Cottone M. and Chiavetta E. 2010, La scrittura epistolare in Europa dal Medioevo ai nostri giorni: generi, modelli e trasformazioni, Bonanno, Acireale.
Dawson G. 1995, The Imperial Adventure Hero and British Masculinity: The imagining of Sir Henry Havelock, in Foley T., Pilkington L., Ryder R.S. and Tilley E. (eds.), Gender and Colonialism, Galway University Press, Galway, pp. 46–59.
Daybell J. 2012, The Material Letter in Early Modern England: Manuscript Letters and the Culture and Practices of Letter-Writing, 1512-1635, Springer, Berlin.
Del Lungo G. 2014, Letters and letter writing in early modern culture: An introduction, in “Journal of Early Modern Studies”, 3 [17], pp. 17-35.
Dossena M. and Del Lungo Camiciotti G. (eds.) 2012, Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam.
Dossena M. 2012, The Study of Correspondence, in Dossena M. and Del Lungo Camiciotti G. (eds.), Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam, pp. 13-30.
Dossena, M. and van Ostade, I.T.B. (eds.) 2008, Studies in Late Modern English Correspondence: Methodology and Data, Peter Lang, Bern.
Dossena M. and Fitzmaurice S.M. (eds.) 2006, Business and Historical Correspondence: Historical Investigations, Introduction, Peter Lang, Bern.
Earle R. (ed.) 2016, Epistolary Selves: Letters and Letter-Writers, 1600–1945, Routledge, London.
Fitzmaurice S.M. 2002, The Familiar Letter in Early Modern English: A Pragmatic Approach, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam.
Fremont-Barnes G. 2014, The Indian Mutiny 1857–58, Bloomsbury Publishing, London.
Goodman D. 2005, Letter writing and the emergence of gendered subjectivity in eighteenth-century France in “Journal of Women's History”, 17[2], pp. 9-37.
Herring, S.C., Scheidt L.A., Bonus S. and Wright E. 2004, Bridging the gap: A genre analysis of weblogs, in “Proceedings of the 37thHawaii International Conference on System Sciences”, pp. 1-11.
Hine R.V. and Faragher J.M. 2007, Frontiers: A Short History of the American West, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Houdt T. 2002, Self-Presentation and Social Identification: The Rhetoric and Pragmatics of Letter Writing in Early Modern Times, Leuven University Press, Leuven.
Hunston S. 2011, Doing analysis in discourse and corpus: the case of evaluative language, “Plenary Paper presented at Corpus Linguistics”, pp.20-22.
Nevalainen T. and Tanskanen S.K. (eds.) 2007, Letter Writing, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam.
Ogborn M. 2007, Indian Ink: Script and Print in the Making of the English East India Company, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Pahta P., Nevala M. and Nurmi A. (eds.) 2010, Social Roles and Language Practices in Late Modern English, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam.
Pahta, P. and Taavitsainen, I. 2010, Scientific discourse in Jucker A.H. and Taavitsainen I. (eds.), Historical Pragmatics, DeGruyter Mouton, Berlin, pp. 549-586.
Palander-Collin M. 2010, Correspondence, in Jucker A.H. and Taavitsainen I. (eds.), Historical Pragmatics, DeGruyter Mouton, Berlin, pp. 651-677.
Rӧmer U. 2010, Establishing the phraseological profile of a text type: The construction of meaning in academic book reviews, in “English Text Construction”, 3 [1], pp. 95–119.
Roy K. and Rand G. (eds.) 2017, Culture, Conflict and the Military in Colonial South Asia, Taylor and Francis, London.
Schneider G. 2005, The Culture of Epistolarity: Vernacular Letters and Letter Writing in Early Modern England, 1500-1700, University of Delaware Press, Delaware.
Scott M. 2010, Wordsmith Tools, version 7.0, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Sinclair J.M. 2004, Trust the Text. Language, Corpus, and Discourse, Routledge, London.
Sinclair J.M. 1996, The empty lexicon, in “International Journal of Corpus Linguistics”, 1[1], pp.99-119.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade I. 2008, Letters as a Source for Reconstructing Social Networks: The case of Robert Lowth, in Tieken-Boon van Ostade I., Dossena M. and van Ostade I.T.B. (eds.), Studies in Late Modern English Correspondence: Methodology and Data, pp.51-76.
Tiffin C. and Lawson A. (eds.) 1994, De-Scribing Empire: Post-Colonialism and Textuality, Taylor and Francis, London.
Tognini-Bonelli E. 2001, Corpus Linguistics at Work, John Benjamins Publishings, Amsterdam.
Full Text: pdf
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
