صندلی اداری طراحی قالب وردپرس آموزش وردپرس

A cognitive, socio-semiotic, linguistic, and discursive approach to popularisation strategies in infographics


Abstract


Information graphics or infographics are multimodal discursive spaces created by the combination of data and information visualisation, typography and colour. As effective forms of information communication and popularisation, infographics are frequently used by international organizations and government bodies as a means of popularising complex topics linked to health, food safety, politics, business and the environment. In this paper, Ciuccarelli’s 2012 concept of the visual macroscope is adopted as an interpretative lens on a small corpus of infographics from the World Health Organisation, together with the tools of socio-semiotic, linguistic and discursive analysis, applied in a bottom-up approach. From a socio-semiotic perspective, it is seen that layout, pictorials, colour, typography and the order of information combine to make the ideal (solution or goal), the scope of the problem and the real stand out; from a linguistic and discursive point of view, thematic organization interacts with pictorial organization to make salient information emerge; lexical repetition, unmarked declaratives, and constant theme enact the strategy of explanation, frequently used in popularisation discourse.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i22390359v29p291

Keywords: infographics; popularisation; interdiscursivity

References


Barthes R. 1977, Image, Music and Text. Roland Barthes, Essays selected and translated by Stephen Heath, Fontana Press, London.

Bhatia V.K. 1993, Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings, Longman, London.

Bhatia V.K. 1995, Genre-mixing in Professional Communication: The Case of ‘Private Intentions’ v. ‘Socially Recognised Purposes’, in Bruthiaux P., Boswood T. and Bertha B. (eds.), Explorations in English for Professional Communication, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, pp. 1-19.

Bezemer J. and Jewitt C. 2010, Multimodal Analysis: Key Issues, in Litosseliti L. (ed.), Research Methods in Linguistics, Continuum, London, pp. 180-197.

Calsamiglia H. and Van Dijk T.A. 2004, Popularization Discourse and Knowledge about the Genome, in “Discourse and Society” 15 [4], pp. 369-389.

Ciuccarelli P. 2012, Turning Visualisations into Stories and ‘Big Pictures’, in Rendgen S., Information Graphics, with Essays by Paolo Ciuccarelli, Richard Saul Wurman, Simon Rogers, Taschen, Köln, pp. 79-84.

Ghadessy M., Henry A. and Roseberry R.L. 2001, Introduction, in Ghadessy M., Henry A. and Roseberry R.L (eds.), Small Corpus Study and ELT. Theory and Practice, Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. xvii-xxii.

Gershon N. and Page W. 2001, What Storytelling Can Do for Information Visualization, in “Communications of the ACM” 44 [8], pp. 31-37.

De Grolier É. 1979, The Organization of Information Systems for Government and Public Administration, Unesco, Paris.

The Institute for the Advancement of Research in Education (IARE) at AEL 2013, Graphic Organizers: a Review of Scientifically Based Research. http://www.inspiration.com/sites/default/files/documents/Detailed-Summary.pdf (13.03.2018)

Kress G. and van Leeuwen T. 1996 (2006), Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, Routledge, London.

Kress G. and van Leeuwen T. 2001, Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication, Arnold, London.

Kress G. 2010, Multimodality. A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication, Routledge, London.

Krum R. 2014, Cool Infographics: Effective Communication with Data Visualization and Design, John Wiley & Sons, Indianapolis.

Lankow J., Ritchie, J., and Crooks R. 2012, Infographics: The Power of Visual Storytelling, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.

Miller G. 1983, Informavores, in Machlup F. and Mansfield U. (eds.), The Study of Information: Interdisciplinary Messages, John Wiley, New York, pp. 111-113.

Moirand S. 2003, Communication and Cognitive Dimensions of Discourse on Science in the French Mass Media, in “Discourse Studies” 5 [2], pp. 175-206.

Oxford English Dictionary. http://www.oed.com (3.4.2018).

Rendgen S. 2012, Introduction, in Rendgen S., Information Graphics,with Essays by Paolo Ciuccarelli, Richard Saul Wurman, Simon Rogers, Taschen, Köln, pp. 9-18.

de Rosnay J. 1975, Le Macroscope. Vers une Vision Globale, Seuil, Paris.

Segel E. and Heer J. 2010, Narrative Visualization: Telling Stories with Data, in “IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics” 16 [6], pp. 1139-1148.

Sinclair J.M. 2001, Preface, in Ghadessy M., Henry A. and Roseberry R.L. (eds.), Small Corpus Study and ELT. Theory and Practice, Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. vii-xv.

Smiciklas J.M. 2012, The Power of Infographics. Using Pictures to Communicate and Connect with Your Audiences, QUE Pearson Education, Indianapolis.

Toth C. 2013, Revisiting a Genre: Teaching Infographics in Business and Professional Communication Courses, in “Business Communication Quarterly” 76 [4], pp. 446-457.

Trumbo J. 1999, Visual Literacy and Science Communication, in “Science Communication” 20 [4], pp. 409-425.

Trumbo J. 2000, Seeing Science. Research Opportunities in the Visual Communication of Science, in “Science Communication” 21 [4], pp. 379-391.


Full Text: pdf

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.