طراحی قالب وردپرس

Serpenti, eroi e rose di maggio. La danza cosmica di femminile e maschile in Shakespeare


Abstract


Abstract – Drawing from Riane Eisler’s Cultural Transformation Theory, this article focuses on some representative feminine figures in Shakespeare’s plays as manifestations of what the anthropologist Riane Eisler defines as the partnership paradigm as opposed to the dominator one. The chapter shows some relevant analogies between the Elizabethan world picture with its ‘order and degree’ and Eisler’s dominator model, and how Shakespeare challenges and subverts the ruling cultural paradigm of his time through the representations of ‘otherness’ in some women characters who clearly embody the partnership model. In partnership society, roles are not imposed through fear and violence but shared within a loving and caring community, more oriented towards what Krippendorff (2014) calls the “reign of freedom”. Here, each person self-regulates and modulates the limits of his/her individualism by respecting also the common good and happiness of all. While the male hero of the tragedy fails in his extreme individualism, this partnership community, found especially in the comedy, is women-oriented and shows how one can ‘govern’ with grace, irony, imagination, and wisdom, thus teaching how peoples of different colours and personalities can participate in the creative and ever-changing art of living in a true community. Female figures who show strong traits connected them to a partnership dimension are present also in the tragedy as a foil or an alternative to patriarchal rule.


DOI Code: 10.1285/i22390359v27p331

Keywords: Shakespeare; tragedy; comedy; Partnership studies; Elizabethan world picture

References


Adams C. (a cura di) 1993, Ecofeminism and the Sacred, Continuum, New York.

Agha-Jaffar T. 2002, Demeter and Persephone. Lessons from a Myth, McFarland, Jefferson, NC.

Bakhtin M. 1968. Rabelais and His World; trad. di Iswolsky H., MIT, Cambridge, Mass/ Londra.

Bolen S. 1991, Le Dee dentro la donna. Una nuova psicologia femminile, Astrolabio, Roma.

Bolen S. 1998, Passaggio ad Avalon, Piemme, Milano.

Bolen S. 2001, Goddesses in Older Women, HarperCollins, New York.

Boose L. 1991, Scolding Brides and Bridling Scolds: Taming the Woman’s Unruly Member, in “Shakespeare Quarterly” 42 [2], pp. 179-213.

Braidotti R. 1994, Nomadic Subjects: Embodiments and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory, Columbia University Press, New York.

Campbell J. (a cura di) 1955, Pagan and Christian Mysteries: Papers from the Eranos Yearbooks, Bollingen, New York.

Campbell J. e Muses C. (a cura di) 1991, In All Her Names: Explorations of the Feminine in Divinity, Harper, S. Francisco.

Capra F. 1975, The Tao of Physics, Shambhala, Boston.

Capra F. 1982, The Turning Point, Simon & Schuster, New York.

Capra F. 1986, The Concept of Paradigm and Paradigm Shift, in “Re-Vision” 9 [1], p.3.

Capra F. 1988, Uncommon Wisdom, Simon & Schuster, New York.

Capra F. 1996, The Web of Life, Doubleday-Anchor, New York.

Capra F. e Steindl-Rast D. 1991, Belonging to the Universe, Harper & Row, San Francisco.

Carlson K. 1997, Life’s Daughter/Death’s Bride: Inner Transformations through the Goddess Demeter/Persephone, Shambhala, Boston.

Carrassi V. 2004, A Midsummer Night’s Dream”: Un sogno chiamato teatro, in “Contesti. Raccolta di studi e ricerca” 16, pp. 37-67.

de Tar C., Finkelstein J. e Chung-I Tan (a cura di) 1985, A Passion for Physics, World Scientific, Singapore.

D’Agostino N. (a cura di) 2016, Le allegre comari di Windsor, Garzanti, Milano.

Devlin-Glass F. e McCreddon L. (a cura di) 2001, Feminist Poetics of the Sacred. Creative Suspicions, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York.

Dusinberre J. 1975, Shakespeare and the Nature of Women, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.

Eagleton T. 1986, William Shakespeare, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

Eisler R. 2011, Il Calice e la Spada. La civiltà della Grande Dea dal Neolitico ad oggi, Forum, Udine.

Eilser R. 2012, Il piacere è sacro. Il potere e la sacralità del corpo dal Neolitico a oggi, Forum, Udine.

Eisler R. 2016, L’infanzia di domani, Forum, Udine.

Eisler R. 2018, Il potere della partnership. Sette modalità di relazione per una nuova vita, Forum, Udine.

Eliade M. 1970, Trattato di storia delle religioni, Einaudi, Torino.

Fox M. (a cura di) 1985, Illuminations of Hildegard of Bingen, Bear & Co., Santa Fe.

Goddard M.E. 2013, “Reading Parenthood and the Pregnant Body in Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream and Titus Andronicus”, University of Tennessee Honors Thesis Projects.

Hagender F. 2001, Lo spirito degli alberi, Crisalide, Latina.

Harris A. 1980, Night’s Black Agents. Witchcraft and Magic in Seventeenth-Century English Drama, Manchester University Press, Manchester.

Hooker R. 1977, Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity, in The Folger Library Edition of the Works of Richard Hooker, voll. 1-3, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Jacobelli M.C. 2004, Il Risus paschalis e il fondamento teologico del piacere sessuale, Queriniana, Brescia.

Jardine L. 1983, Still Harping on Daughters: Women and Drama in the Age of Shakespeare, Harvester Press, Sussex.

Kahn C. 1997, Roman Shakespeare: Warriors, Wounds, and Women, Routledge, Londra.

Kellert S. 1993, In the Wake of Chaos. Unpredictable Order in Dynamical Systems, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

Kellert S., Longino H.E. e Waters C.K. (a cura di) 2006, Scientific Pluralism, Minnesota University Press, Minneapolis.

Knight G.W. 1951, The Imperial Theme, Methuen, Londra.

Krippendorff E. 2014, Le commedie di Shakespeare. Il regno della libertà, Fazi, Roma.

Lombardo A. 1969, Lettura di Macbeth, Neri Pozza, Vicenza.

Lucking D. 2011, Translation and Metamorphosis in “A Midsummer Night’s Dream”, in “Essays in Criticism” 61 [2], pp. 137-154.

McKewin C. 1980, Counsels of Gall and Grace: Intimate Conversations between Women in Shakespeare’s Plays, in Greene G., Swift Lenz D.R. e Neely C.T. (a cura di), The Women’s Part: Feminist Criticism of Shakespeare, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp. 117-132.

Mercanti S. 2011, Glossario mutuale, in Eisler R. (a cura di), Il calice e la spada, Udine, Forum, pp. 403-415.

Newman K. 2009, Essaying Shakespeare, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

Nicholls P. 1989, Old Problems and the New Historicism, in “Journal of American Studies” 23 [3], pp. 423-434.

Nicolini L. (a cura di) 2005, Apuleio. Le Metamorfosi, BUR Rizzoli, Milano.

Noble V. 1994, Motherpeace. A Way to the Goddess through Myth Art and Tarot, Harper, San Francisco.

Packer, T. 2015, Women of Will: Following the Feminine in Shakespeare’s Plays, Knopf, New York.

Pagels E. 1979, The Gnostic Gospels, Random House, Londra.

Panikkar R. 2007, Lo spirito della parola, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino.

Paster G.K. 2004, Humoring the Body Emotions and the Shakespearean Stage, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Petrina A. 2015, Nota introduttiva, traduzione e note a Le Allegre comari di Windsor, in Marenco F. (a cura di), Tutte le opere di William Shakespeare, vol II, Bompiani-Giunti, Firenze, pp. 1045-1064.

Pikli N. 2009, The Prism of Laughter. Shakespeare’s “very tragical mirth”, VDM Verlag, Saarbrücken.

Rackin, P. 2005, Shakespeare and Women, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Riem Natale A. 2005, The “Weird Sisters” as Priestesses of the Goddess in Macbeth, in “Merope” 15 [44], pp. 5-36. http://www.tracce.org/merope.html (11.1.2018).

Rigby K. 2001, The Goddess Returns. Ecofeminist Reconfigurations of Gender, Nature and the Sacred, in Devlin-Glass F. e McCreddon L. (a cura di) 2001, Feminist Poetics of the Sacred. Creative Suspicions, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, pp. 23-54.

Sacerdoti G. 1990, Nuovo cielo, nuova terra – La rivelazione copernicana di “Antonio e Cleopatra” di Shakespeare, Il Mulino, Bologna.

Sagar K. 2001, Antony and Cleopatra. http://www.keithsagar.co.uk/Reading Shakespeare/ (10.1.2018).

Said E. 1978, Orientalism, Pantheon, New York.

Seppilli A. 1962, Poesia e Magia, Einaudi, Torino.

Shakespeare W. 1962, Macbeth; a cura di Miur K., Arden Edition, Methuen, Londra.

Shakespeare W. 1969, Troilus and Cressida, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Shakespeare W. 1971, The Merry Wives of Windsor; a cura di Oliver H.J., Arden edition, Methuen, Londra.

Shakespeare W. 1992, Antony and Cleopatra; a cura di Lombardo A., Feltrinelli, Milano.

Shakespeare W. 2005, Hamlet; a cura di Bertinetti P., Einaudi, Torino.

Shakespeare W. 2016, The Merry Wives of Windsor; a cura di D’Agostino N., Garzanti, Milano.

Showalter E. 1985, Representing Ophelia: Women, Madness, and the Responsibilities of Feminist Criticism, in Parker P. e Hartman G. (a cura di) Shakespeare and the Question of Theory, Methuen, Londra, pp. 77-94.

Sonnenschein S. 2007, An Analysis and Study of the Leading Characters in ‘Hamlet’, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Stevens A. 2001, Ariadne’s Clue: A Guide to the Symbols of Humankind, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Thich Nhat Hanh. 1993, La pace è ogni passo, Ubaldini, Roma.

Tillyard E.M.W. 1976, The Elizabethan World Picture, Chatto & Windus, Londra.

Traub V. 2016 (a cura di) The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare and Embodiment: Gender, Sexuality, and Race, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Turgut F. 2014, Orientalism and Unfavourable Positioning in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra, in “Narrative and Language Studies” II [3], pp. 1-16.

Walker B. 1988, The Woman’s Dictionary of Symbols and Sacred Objects, Harper & Row, San Francisco.

Weston J. 2011, From Ritual to Romance, Dover publications, Mineola, NY.

Wyrick D.B. 1982, The Ass Motif in the “Comedy of Errors” and “A Midsummer Night’s Dream”, in “Shakespeare Quarterly” 33 [4], pp. 432-448.


Full Text: pdf

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.