Web searches for learning. How language teachers search for online resources


Abstract – This paper discusses the results of a project investigating the use of web searching for professional purpose by language teachers of different school levels. The study focuses on language teachers’ actual practice: criteria for planning the web search, identifying and selecting resources, sharing and using them for their teaching practice. Resources (Open Educational Resources in particular) have been multiplying on the web, but finding specific resources is often difficult because they are not uniformly classified and organized on the net, and there are no user-friendly interface/tools that facilitate search. This research project aims at identifying best practices and developing guidelines for web searching in language teacher education. The research questions addressed are: How do (language) teachers search for resources on the Web? What categories of resources? What strategies do they adopt for selecting, assessing and sharing resources? We interviewed and recorded six expert teachers about their web searches for educational purposes; we video-recorded their web searching tasks while they were commenting on their online choices through think-aloud protocols. The results of data analysis show main trends in the strategies used by these expert teachers: personalization of the web searching process by accessing websites suggested by trusted colleagues offline or online; selecting trustworthy websites of well-known institutions; relevance of resources not created for educational purposes; need for adaptation and re-contextualization of resources; web searches for class activities as a reflection on teaching practice and personal development. Ultimately web searching is a heuristic process of personal and collective learning for professional purpose in a lifelong perspective.

Keywords: websearch; multiliteracy; OER; language teacher education; lifelong learning


Barton D. and Lee C. 2013, Language online. Investigating digital texts and practices. Routledge, London.

Beaven T. 2013, Use and Reuse of OER: professional conversations with language teachers, in “Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society” 9 [1], pp. 59-71. http://www.je-lks.org/ojs/index.php/Je-LKS_EN/article/view/802 (24.3.2017).

Beaven T. 2015, OER (re)use and language teachers’ tacit professional knowledge: Three vignettes, in Borthwick K., Corradini E. and Dickens A. (eds.), 10 years of the LLAS elearning symposium: Case studies in good practice, Research-publishing.net, Dublin, pp. 77-88.

Bortoluzzi M. and Marenzi I., 2014, YELLing for collaborative learning in teacher education: users’ voices in the social platform LearnWeb2.0, in “International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments” 2 [2], pp. 182-198.

Camilleri A. F., Ehlers U. D. and Pawlowski J. 2014, State of the art review of quality issues related to open educational resources (OER), European Commission, Luxembourg. http://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2014/9101/pdf/European_Commission_2014_OER.pdf (24.3.2017)

Cope B. and Kalantzis M. 2009a, Multiliteracies: New literacies, new learning, in “Pedagogies: An International Journal” 4 [3], pp. 164-195.

Cope B. and Kalantzis M. 2009b, New media, new learning, in Cole D. R. and Pullen D. L. (eds.), Multiliteracies in Motion: Current Theory and Practice, Routledge, London, pp.87-103.

Cope B. and Kalantzis M. (eds) 2015a, A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Learning By Design, London: Palgrave.

Cope B. and Kalantzis M. (eds) 2015b, The Things you do to know. An Introduction to the pedagogy of multiliteracy, in Cope, B. and Kalantzis (Eds), M.A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Learning By Design, Palgrave, London, pp: 1-36.

Dörney, Z. 2007, Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Dudeney G., Hockley N. and Pegrum M. 2013, Digital Literacies. Research and Resources in language teaching, Routledge, London.

Edge J. 2011, The Reflexive Teacher Educator in TESOL. Roots and Wings, Routledge, London.

Ehlers U.-D. 2011, From open educational resources to open educational practices, in “eLearning Papers” 23 [March], pp. 1-8. http://www.openeducationeuropa.eu/en/download/file/fid/22240 (24.3.2017).

European Union, 2007, Key Competences for lifelong learning. European reference framework, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/publ/pdf/ll-learning/keycomp_en.pdf (24.2.2015).

Goodfellow R. and Lamy M.-N. (eds.) 2009, Learning cultures in online education, Continuum, London.

Guariento W. and Morley J. 2001, Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom, in “ETL Journal” 55 [4] pp. 347-353.

Hwang H.K., Marenzi I., Bortoluzzi M., Ronchetti M., 2017, “The role of context for user annotations in searching shared materials”, in Xie, H., Popescu, E., Hancke, G., Fernández Manjón, B. (eds.), Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2017. 16th International Conference on Web-based Learning, Cape Town, South Africa, September 20-22, 2017, Proceedings, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), pp. 91-100.

Iiyoshi T. and Kumar M.S.V. 2008, Opening up education: the collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge, The MIT Press, Cambridge. https://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/titles/content/9780262515016_Open_Access_Edition.pdf (24.3.2017)

Jones R. H. and Hafner C. A. 2012, Understanding digital literacies. A practical introduction, Routledge, London.

Kalantzis M. and Cope B. 2010, The Teacher as designer: Pedagogy in the New Media Age, in “E-Learning and Digital Media” 7 [3], pp. 200-222.

Kalantzis M., Cope B. and Cloonan A. 2010, A multiliteracies perspective on the New Literacies, in Baker E. A. (ed.), The New Literacies. Multiple Perspectives on Research and Practice, The Guildford Press, New York, pp. 61-87.

Krathwohl, D. R. 2002, A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An overview, in “Theory into practice” 41 [4] pp. 212-218.

Marenzi I., 2014a, Multiliteracies and e-learning 2.0. Foreign language pedagogy content- and learner-oriented, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Mein.

Marenzi I., 2014b, Interactive and collaborative supports for CLIL: towards a formal model based on digital literacy, in Kupetz R. and Becker C. (eds.) Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) by Interaction, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 75-99.

Marenzi I., Bortoluzzi M. and Kalyani R. 2016, YELL/TELL: online community platform for teacher professional development, in Papadima-Sophocleous S., Bradley L., and Thouësny S. (eds.) CALL communities and culture – short papers from EUROCALL 2016, Dublin, Research-publishing.net, pp. 307-312, https://research-publishing.net/content.php?doi=10.14705/rpnet.2016.EUROCALL2016.9781908416445 (24.3.2017).

Marenzi I., and Nejdl W. 2012, “I search therefore I learn. Supporting active and collaborative learning in language teaching”, in Okada A., Connolly T. and Scott P. (eds.), Collaborative learning 2.0: Open Educational Resources, Hershey, PA, IGI Global, Information Science Reference, pp.103-125.

Marenzi I., and Zerr S. 2012, Multiliteracies and active learning in CLIL: the development of LearnWeb2.0, in “IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies” 5 [4] pp. 336-48.

Marchionini G. 2006, Exploratory search: from finding to understanding, in “Commun. ACM” 49 [4] pp. 41-46.

Nürberger, A., Stange, D. and Kotzyba M. 2015, Professional collaborative information seeking: On traceability and creative sensemaking, in Cardoso, J. et al. (eds) Semantic Keyword-based Search on Structured Data Sources. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9398, Springer, Cham (Switzerland), pp. 1-16.

Rheingold H. 2012, Net Smart. How to thrive online, The MIT Press, Cambridge, U.S.

Richards J. 2012, Using authentic materials in the EFL classroom. http://www.professorjackrichards.com/using-authentic-materials-in-the-efl-classroom/ (24.3.2017)

Richards J. 2016, Introduction, in “RELC Journal” 47 [1], pp. 3-4.

UNESCO, 2002, What are Open Educational Resources (OERs)? http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/access-to-knowledge/open-educational-resources/what-are-open-educational-resources-oers/ (24.3.2017).

Vakkari, P. 2016, Searching as learning: A Systematization based on literature, in “Journal of Information Science” 42 [1] pp. 7-18.

Vuorikari R. and Brecko B. 2014, How could teachers' professional collaboration in teacher networks be better studied as part of digital competence?, in Viteli J. and Leikomaa M. (eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), pp. 1821-1826.

Vuorikari R. et al. 2012, Teacher networks. Today’s and Tomorrow’s Challenges and Opportunities for the Teaching Profession, Brussels, European Schoolnet. http://service.eun.org/teachers-newsletter/TellNet_Teacher_Networks_web.pdf (8.10. 2016).

Vygotsky L. S. 1962, Thought and language, Cambridge, U.S., The MIT Press.

Vygotsky L. S. 1978, Mind and society, Cambridge, U.S., The MIT Press.

Wallace M. 1999, The reflective model revisited, in Trappes-Lomax H. and McGrath I. (eds.), Theory in Language Teacher Education, Longman, London, pp. 179-187.

Williams M. and Burden R.L. 1997, Psychology for Language Teachers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Yelland N., Cope B. and Kalantzis M. 2008, Learning by Design: creating pedagogical framework for knowledge building in the twenty-first century, in “Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education” 36 [3], pp. 197-213.

Full Text: pdf


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.