The Role of 'Concepts' in John Pocock's Methodology


Abstract


The study of 'concepts' is one of the problematic issues in the methodology of the history of political thought. The different dimensions of the problem cannot be understood without following the discussions of the 'Cambridge School', of which John Pocock is recognised as one of the main figures, and its debates with approaches such as the 'history of concepts'. But, given that in Pocock's theory, 'language(s)' and linguistic structures such as 'discourse' and 'paradigm' are more important, the role of 'concepts' in his methodology has not been properly investigated. Melvin Richter even once declared that Pocock's approach lacks attention to the history of concepts. This article tries to demonstrate that not only does Pocock not neglect concepts theoretically, and in his research he investigates practically the history of concepts wherever needed, but also, the concepts in his methodology become more effective than he initially assumes.

Keywords: Contextualism; migration of concepts; discourse; paradigm; diachronic

References


Appleby, J. (2006). One Good Turn Deserves Another: Moving Beyond the Linguistic: A Response to David Harlan. In R. M. Burns (Ed.), Historiography: Critical Concepts in Historical Studies. Vol. III: Ideas, 126-133. Routledge.

Ball, T. (2001). Discordant voices: American histories of political thought. In D. Castiglione, & I. Hampsher-Monk (Eds.). The History of Political Thought in National Context, 107-134. Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521317

Ball, T. (2007). Professor Skinner’s Visions. Political Studies Review 5, 351–364.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9299.2007.00139.

Ball, T., & Pocock, J. G. A. (1988). Conceptual Change and the Constitution. University Press of Kansas.

Bevir, M. (1992). The Errors of Linguistic Contextualism. History and Theory 31(3), 276-298. https://doi.org/10.2307/2505371

Bevir, M. (2004). The Logic of the History of Ideas. Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490446

Blänkner, R. (2021). Otto Brunner und Reinhart Koselleck: Sprache und politisch-soziale Ordnung. In M. Hettling, & W. Schieder (Hg). Reinhart Koselleck als Historiker: Zu den Bedingungen möglicher Geschichten, 112-148. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666317293

Blau, A. (2017). Methods in Analytical Political Theory. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316162576

Boletsi, M., & Moser, C. (2015). Barbarism Revisited: New Perspectives on an Old Concept. Brill-Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004309272

Boucher, D. (1985). Texts in Context: Revisionist Methods for Studying the History of Ideas. Martinus Nijhoff.

Browning, G. (2016). A History of Modern Political Thought: The Question of Interpretation. Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/9780199682287

Collingwood, R. G. (1939). An Autobiography. Oxford University Press.

Collingwood, R. G. (1956). The Idea of History. Oxford University Press.

Dunn, J. (1996). The History of Political Theory and other essays. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621994

Freeden, M., & Fernández-Sebastián, J. (2019). European Liberal Discourses: Conceptual Affinities and Disparities. In M. Freeden, & J. Fernández-Sebastián (Eds.), In Search of European Liberalisms: Concepts, Languages, Ideologies, 1-37. Berghahn.

https://doi.org/10.3167/9781789202809

Gunnell, J. G. (2011). Political Theory and Social Science: Cutting Against the Grain. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230117587

Hampsher-Monk, I. (2001). The History of Political Thought and the Political History of Thought. In D. Castiglione, & I. Hampsher-Monk (Eds.), The History of Political Thought in National Context, 159-175. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521317

Harlan, D. (2006). Intellectual History and the Return of Literature. In R. M. Burns (Ed.), Historiography: Critical Concepts in Historical Studies. Vol. III: Ideas, 92-126. Routledge.

Hartmann, N. (1958). Kleinere Schriften. Band 3: Vom Neukantianismus zur Ontologie. Walter de Gruyter & Co.

Koselleck, R. (1974). Einleitung. In O. Brunner, W. Conze, & R. Koselleck (Hg), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland. Band 1, XIII-XXVII. Klett-Cotta.

Koselleck, R. (1994). Some Reflections on the Temporal Structure of Conceptual Change. In W. Melching, & W. Velema (Eds.), Main Trends in Cultural History, 7-17. Rodopi.

Koselleck, R. (1995). Vergangene Zukunft: Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Suhrkamp.

Koselleck, R. (1996). A Response to Comments on the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. In H. Lehmann, & M. Richter (Eds.), The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts: New Studies on Begriffsgeschichte, 59-70. German Historical Institute.

Koselleck, R. (2000). Zeitschichten: Studien zur Historik. Suhrkamp.

Koselleck, R. (2002). The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Stanford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503619104

Koselleck, R. (2006). Begriffsgeschichten: Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der politischen und sozialen Sprache. Suhrkamp.

https://doi.org/10.1515/zrs.2010.016

Lara, M. P. (2013). The Disclosure of Politics: Struggles Over the Semantics of Secularization. Columbia University Press.

https://doi.org/10.7312/lara16280

Laslett, P. (1949). Introduction. In P. Laslett (Ed.), Robert Filmer's Patriarcha and Other Political Works, 1-43. Basil Blackwell.

Mossleh, P. (2023). On Lithoconcepts: A Critical Contribution to the Discussions about the Study of Concepts. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory 26(1), 57-78.

https://doi.org/10.33134/rds.383

Moyn, S. (2023). History, Law and the Rediscovery of Social Theory. In R. Bourke, & Q. Skinner (Eds.), History in the Humanities and Social Sciences, 49-68. Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009231053

Nederman, C. J. (2024). In Memoriam: J. G. A. Pocock. The European Legacy: Toward New Paradigms, 01 Feb 2024.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2024.2311444

Palonen, K. (2014). Politics and Conceptual Histories: Rhetorical and Temporal Perspectives. Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845252858

Pernau, M., & Jordheim, H. (2015). Civilizing Emotions: Concepts in Nineteenth-Century Asia and Europe. Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745532.001.0001

Pocock, J. G. A. (1964). The History of Political Thought: A Methodological Enquiry. In P. Laslett, & W. G. Runciman (Eds.), Philosophy, Politics and Society. Second Series, 183-202. Basil Blackwell.

Pocock, J. G. A. (1987). Texts as Events: Reflections on the History of Political Thought. In K. Sharpe, & S. N. Zwicker (Eds.), Politics of Discourse: The Literature and History of Seventeenth-Century England, 21-34. University of California Press.

Pocock, J. G. A. (1989). Politics, Language, and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History. University of Chicago Press.

Pocock, J. G. A. (1990). The Concept of a Language and the métier d'historien: Some Considerations on Practice. In A. R. Pagden (Ed.), The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe, 19-38. Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521447

Pocock, J. G. A. (1993). A Discourse of Sovereignty: Observations on the Work in Progress. In N. Phillipson, & Q. Skinner (Eds.), Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain, 377-428. Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511659980

Pocock, J. G. A. (1996a). Concepts and Discourses: A Difference in Culture? Comment on a Paper by Melvin Richter. In H. Lehmann, & M. Richter (Eds.), The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts: New Studies on Begriffsgeschichte, 47-58. German Historical Institute.

Pocock, J. G. A. (1996b). Political Thought in the English-Speaking Atlantic 1760-1790: Part 1: The Imperial Crisis. In J. G. A. Pocock, G. L. Schochet, & L. G. Schwoerer (Eds.), The Varieties of British Political Thought 1500-1800, 246-282. Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665875

Pocock, J. G. A. (2002). Virtue, Commerce, and History: Essays on Political Thought and History. Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720505

Pocock, J. G. A. (2003). The Machiavelli Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton University Press.

Pocock, J. G. A. (2004). Quentin Skinner: The History of Politics and the Politics of History. Common Knowledge 10(3), 532-550.

https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-10-3-532

Pocock, J. G. A. (2006). What is intellectual history? In R. M. Burns (Ed.), Historiography: Critical Concepts in Historical Studies. Vol. III: Ideas, 23-25. Routledge.

Pocock, J. G. A. (2011). Historiography as a Form of Political Thought. History of European Ideas 37(1), 1-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2010.09.002

Pocock, J. G. A. (2019a). A Response to Samuel James’s "J. G. A. Pocock and the Idea of the Cambridge School in the History of Political Thought". History of European Ideas 45(1), 99-103.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2018.1535591

Pocock, J. G. A. (2019b). On the Unglobality of Contexts: Cambridge Methods and the History of Political Thought. Global Intellectual History 4(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/23801883.2018.1523997

Pocock, J. G. A., & Schochet G. J. (1996). Interregnum and Restoration. In J. G. A. Pocock, G. J. Schochet, & L. G. Schwoerer (Eds), The Varieties of British Political Thought 1500-1800, 146-179. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665875

Richter, M. (1995). The History of Political and Social Concepts: A Critical Introduction, Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195088267.001.0001

Shapiro, I. (1982). Realism in the Study of the History of Ideas. History of Political Thought 3, 535-578.

Skinner, Q. (1988). A Reply to My Critics: Introduction: for Method. In J. Tully (Ed.), Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his Critics, 231-235. Princeton University Press.

Skinner, Q. (2002). Visions of Politics: Volume 1: Regarding Method. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790812

Skinner, Q. (2006). What Is Intellectual History? In R. M. Burns (Ed.), Historiography: Critical Concepts in Historical Studies. Vol. III: Ideas, 21-23. Routledge.

Steinmetz, W., & Freeden, M. (2017). Conceptual History: Challenges, Conundrums, Complexities. In W. Steinmetz, M. Freeden, & J. Fernández-Sebastián (Eds.), Conceptual History in the European Space, 1-46. Berghahn. https://doi.org/10.3167/9781785334825

Toews, J. E. (1987). Intellectual History after the Linguistic Turn: The Autonomy of Meaning and the Irreducibility of Experience. The American Historical Review 92(4), 879-907.

Vanheste, J. (2007). Guardians of the Humanist Legacy: The Classicism of T.S. Eliot's Criterion Network and its Relevance to our Postmodern World. Brill.

Young, B. (2006). Intellectual History in Britain. In R. Whatmore, & B. Young (Eds.), Palgrave Advances in Intellectual History, 25-48. Palgrave Macmillan.


Full Text: pdf

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.