The Shape of the People. Rethinking Populism Beyond Laclau


Abstract


In the theoretical discussion of populism, two main options can be identified: a perspective conceives the populism as a thin-centered ideology; a second perspective believes that populism is a set of rhetorical, stylistic and organizational tools, which can be used by any political force. With respect to these two perspectives, Ernesto Laclau’s proposal outlines a further strategy. This article examines the merits and limitations of Laclau’s proposal.  This paper highlights two problematic aspects: for Laclau, populism is not only a logic of political discourse, but also a political proposal; furthermore, ‘populism’, in his perspective, is not a specific phenomenon, because it is the mechanism by which every political identity is produced. The paper suggests that a solution consists in recovering the distinction between the logic of equivalence and the logic of difference, which was advanced by Laclau and Mouffe during the 1980s.


DOI Code: 10.1285/i20398573v7n2p29

Keywords: Populism; People; Ideology; Ernesto Laclau; Chantal Mouffe

References


Abts, K & Rummens, S 2007, ‘Populism versus democracy’, Political Studies, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 405–424.

https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9248.2007.00657.x

Albertazzi, D & McDonnell, D 2008, ‘Introduction: The sceptre and the spectre’, in D Albertazzi & D McDonnell (eds), Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy, Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, pp. 15–29.

Allcock, JB 1971, ‘Populism: a brief biography’, Sociology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F003803857100500305

Anselmi, M 2017, Populismo. Teorie e problemi, Mondadori, Milano.

Aslanidis, P 2016, ‘Is Populism an Ideology? A refutation and a new perspective’, Political Studies, vol. 64, no. 1 suppl, pp. 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-9248.12224

Baldassari, M & Melegari, D 2012 (eds), Populismo e democrazia radicale. In dialogo con Ernesto Laclau, Ombre Corte, Verona.

Berlin, I, Hofstadter, R, MacRae, D, Schapiro, L, Seton-Watson, H, Touraine, A, Venturi, F, Walicki A & Worsley, P 1968, ‘To Define Populism’, Govern-ment and Opposition, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 173–178.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1968.tb01332.x

Bonaiuti, G 2015, ‘La questione populista. Note sugli (ab)usi filosofici di un con-cetto’, La Società degli Individui, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 22–33. https://doi.org/10.3280/LAS2015-052003

Bonikowski, B & Gidron, N 2016, ‘The populist style in American Politics: Presi-dential campaign discourse, 1952-1996’, Social Forces, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 1593–1621. doi: 10.1093/sf/sov120

Cacciatore, FM 2019 (ed.), Il momento populista. Ernesto Laclau in discussion, Mimesis, Milano.

Canovan, M 1981, Populism, London, Junction.

Canovan, M 1999, ‘Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy’, Political Studies, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 2–16.

https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-9248.00184

Canzoniere Nazionale del Vento Rosso, 1974, Rosso colore dell’amore, Edizioni del Vento Rosso.

Chiapponi, C 2014, Il populismo nella prospettiva della scienza politica. Un primo bilancio, Erga, Genova.

Chignola, S & Mezzadra, S 2012, ‘Fuori dalla pura politica. Laboratori globali della soggettività’, Filosofia politica, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 65–82. doi: 10.1416/36474

Colliot-Thélène, C 2016, ‘Le populisme n’est pas un concept’, Le Cahiers de L’éducation permanente, vol. 49, pp. 105–117.

Colliot-Thélène, C 2018, ‘Populism as a conceptual problem’, in G Fitzi, J Mackert & B Turner (eds), Populism and the Crisis of Democracy, Routledge, pp. 17–26.

Critchley, S & Marchart, O (eds) 2004, Laclau: A Critical Reader, Routledge, Lon-don.

De Cleen, B 2017, ‘Populism and nationalism’, in C Rovira Kaltwasser, P Taggart, P Ochoa Espejo & P Ostiguy (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Populism, Oxford University Press, pp. 342–362.

De Cleen, B, Glynos, J & Mondon, A 2018, ‘Critical Research on populism: Nine rule of engagement’, Organization, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 649–661. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1350508418768053

De Cleen, B & Stavrakakis, Y 2017, ‘Distinctions and articulations: A discourse theoretical framework for the study of populism and nationalism’, Javnost: The Public, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2017.1330083

Deiwiks, C 2009, ‘Populism’, Living Reviews in Democracy, pp. 1-9.

de La Torre, C 2014 (ed.) The Promise and Perils of Populism. Global Perspectives, Uni-versity of Kentucky Press, Lexington.

de La Torre, C 2018 (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Global Populism, Routledge, Lon-don, New York.

Filippini, M 2019, ‘Decentrare il populismo: quattro critiche a Laclau’, in FM Cac-ciatore (ed), Il momento populista. Ernesto Laclau in discussion, Mimesis, pp. 75–98.

Formisano, R 2004, ‘Il populismo negli Stati Uniti’, Ricerche di storia politica, no. 3, pp. 339–340. doi: 10.1412/15474

Freeden, M 1999, Ideologies and Political Theory. A Conceptual Approach, Oxford Uni-versity Press, Oxford.

Freeden, M 2017, ‘After the Brexit referendum: revisiting populism as an ideology’, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2016.1260813

Gennaro Lerda, V 1984, Il populismo americano. Movimenti radicali di protesta agraria nella seconda metà dell’800, Bulzoni, Roma.

Graziano, P 2018, Neopopulismi. Perché sono destinati a durare, Il Mulino, Bologna.

Heywood, A 2007, Political Ideologies. An Introduction, Palgrave, New York.

Hicks, JD 1931, The Populist Revolt The Populist Revolt. A History of the Farmers’ Alli-ance and the People’s Party, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.

Houwen, T 2011, ‘The non-European roots of the concept of populism’, Sussex European Institute, Working Paper, n. 20.

Ionescu, G & Gellner, E (eds.) 1969, Populism. Its Meanings and National Character-istcs, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London.

Jansen, R S 2011, ‘Populist mobilization: A new theoretical approach to populism’, Sociological Theory, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01388.x

Laclau, E 1979, Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory, Verso, London.

Laclau, E 2005, On Populist Reason, Verso, London.

Laclau, E & Mouffe, C 1985, Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Demo-cratic Politics, Verso, London.

MacRae, D 1969, ‘Populism as an ideology’, in G Ionesco & E Gellner (eds), Popu-lism. Its Meanings and National Characteristcs, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, pp. 154–160.

Marchart, O 2007, Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

Mastropaolo, A 2005, La mucca pazza della democrazia. Nuove destre, populismo, antipo-litica, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino.

Mazzolini, S 2020, ‘Populism Is not Hegemony: Towards a Re-Gramscianization of Ernesto Laclau’, Theory and Event, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 765–786

McLellan, D 1995, Ideology, Milton, Open University Press.

Moffit, B 2015, ‘Contemporary populism and ‘the people’ in the Asia-Pacific: Thaksin Shinawatra and Pauline Hanson’, in C de La Torre (ed.), The Prom-ise and Perils of Populism: Global Perspective, University of Kentucky Press, Lexington, pp. 293–316.

Moffitt, B 2016, The Global Rise of Populism. Performance, Political Style, and Represen-tation, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

Moffitt, B ‘Contemporary populism in Australia and New Zealand’, in C Rovira Kaltwasser, P Taggart, P Ochoa Espejo P & Ostiguy (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Populism, Oxford University Press, pp. 121–139.

Moffitt, B 2020, Populism, Polity Press, Cambridge.

Mouffe, C 2018, For a Left Populism, Verso, London.

Mudde, C 2004, ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’, Government and Opposition, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 543–544.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x

Mudde, C & Rovira Kaltwasser, C 2017, Populism. A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Müller, JW 2016, What is populism?, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.

Palano, D 2012, ‘Il principe populista. La sfida di Ernesto Laclau alla teoria demo-cratica’, Baldassari & Melegari, pp. 241–261.

Palano, D 2016, ‘In nome del popolo sovrano? La questione populista nelle post-democrazie contemporanee’, in S Cingari & A Simoncini (eds), Lessico post-democratico, Perugia Stranieri University Press, Perugia, pp. 157–186

Palano, D 2017, Populismo, Bibliografica, Milano.

Palano, D 2019, ‘L’invenzione del populismo. Note per la genealogia di un con-cetto paranoico’, Storia del pensiero politico, no. 2, pp. 297–322. doi: 10.4479/94328

Panizza, F 2005, ‘Introduction: Populism and the Mirror of Democracy’, in F Pa-nizza (ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, Verso, London.

Rokkan, S 1999, State Formation, Nation Building, and Mass Politics in Europe, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Rooduijn, M 2014, ‘The nucleus pf populism: In search of the lowest common de-nominator’, Government and Opposition, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 573–599. doi:10.1017/gov.2013.30

Rovira Kaltwasser, C 2017, ‘How to define populism? Reflections on a contested concepts and its (mis)use in the social sciences’, in in G Fitzi, J Mackert & B Turner (eds), Populism and the Crisis of Democracy, Routledge, pp. 62–78.

Rovira Kaltwasser, C, Taggart, P, Ochoa Espejo, P & Ostiguy P 2017 (eds.), Ox-ford Handbook of Populism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Sartori, G 1970, ‘Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics’, American Political Science Review, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1033–1053. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958356

Shils, E 1956, The Torment of Secrecy. The Background and the Consequences of American Security Policies, The Free Press, New York.

Stanley, B 2008, ‘The thin ideology of populism’, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 95–110.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310701822289

Stavrakakis, Y 2017, ‘How did “populism” become a pejorative concept? And why is this important today? A genealogy of double hermeneutics’, Populismus, Working Papers 6.

Stavrakakis, Y & Jäger, A 2018, ‘Accomplishments and limitattions of the ‘new’ mainstream in contemporary populism studies’, European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 547-565. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1368431017723337

Stavrakakis, Y & Katsambekis, G 2014, ‘Left-wing populism in the European pe-riphery: The case of SYRIZA’, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2014.909266

Taggart, P 2000, Populism, Buckingham, Open University Press.

Tarchi, M 2004, ‘Il populismo e la scienza politica: come liberarsi del complesso di Cenerentola’, Filosofia politica, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 411–429. doi: 10.1416/16274

Tarchi, M 2015, L’Italia populista. Dal qualunquismo a Beppe Grillo, Il Mulino, Bolo-gna.

Tarizzo, D 2015, ‘Populismo: sostanza o attributo?’, La Società degli Individui, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 92–104.

Terragoni, F 2013, ‘La science du populisme au crible de la critique sociologique: archéologie d’un mépris savant du people’, Actuel Marx, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 56–70. https://doi.org/10.3917/amx.054.0056

Weber, M 1904, ‘Die ‘Objektivität’ sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis’, Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 19, pp. 22–87.

Weber, M 1926, Politik als Beruf, Duncker & Humblot, München.

Wodak, R 2015, The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean, Sage, London.

Wodak, R & Meyer, M (eds) 2001, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, Sage, Lon-don.

Zanatta, L 2002, ‘Il populismo. Sul nucleo forte di un’ideologia debole’, Polis, no. 2, pp. 263–292. doi: 10.1424/2958

Zanatta, Z 2013, Il populismo, Carocci, Roma.


Full Text: pdf

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.