Researching the Chechen diaspora in Europe


This article presents the reflection on the fieldwork conducted in 2014-15. The research analysed the link and interplay between Chechen demographic dynamics and Russo-Chechen conflict. The question was approached reflexively: the research population consisted only of Chechen refugees in Europe. The analysis targeted their opinion on the relevant topic.

This article justifies the choice of doing reflexive research. The main reasoning is related to inaccessibility of informants in the Chechen Republic. Furthermore, the article describes the pluses and minuses of this approach and presents the methodological choices made during the fieldwork and before. In sum, it intends to turn the gained experience into a transferable skill advising future researchers on the advantages and disadvantages of applied research methods and warns about the traps that they might face during the fieldwork.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20398573v3n1p201



Abbasi-Shavazi M-J & McDonald P 2000, Fertility and Multiculturalism: Immigrant Fertility in Australia 1977-1991. The International Migration Review 34 (1): 215-242.

Albert C D 2014, The Ethno-Violence Nexus: Measuring Ethnic Group Identity in Chechnya. East European Politics 30 (1): 123-146.

Baiev Kh, Daniloff R & Daniloff N 2004, The Oath, a Surgeon under Fire. London: Pocket.

Creswell, J W 2009, Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: Sage (3rd ed.).

Creswell, J W 2003, Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: Sage (2d ed.).

Denzin N K & Lincoln I S 1994, Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

Denzin N K & Lincoln I S 2011, The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

Duncan O D, Freedman R, Coble M J & Slesinger D P 1965, Marital Fertility and Size of Family of Orientation. Demography 2 (1): 508-515.

Freedman R & Slesinger D P 1961, Fertility Differentials for the Indigenous Non-Farm Population of the United States. Population Studies 15 (2): 161-173.

Goldberg D 1959, The Fertility of Two-Generation Urbanities. Population Studies 12 (3): 214-222.

Henn M, Weinstein M & Foard N 2006, A Short Introduction to Social Reasearch. London: Sage Publications.

Lieven A 2001, Morality and Reality in Approaches to War Crimes: The Case of Chechnya. East European Constitutional Review 10 (2/3). Available online Accessed on April 15, 2015.

Lenth R V 2001, Some Practical Guidelines for Effective Sample Size Determination. The American Statistician 55 (3): 187-193.

Little J S & Rogers A 2007, What Can the Age Composition of a Population Tell Us about the Age Composition of its Out-Migrants? Population, Space and Place (13): 23-39.

Mamakayev M 1973, Chechenskiy teip v period ego razlozheniya. [Chechen Teip in a Period of its Decay]. Grozny. Available online Accessed on September 12, 2015.

Ratelle J-F 2013, Radical Islam and the Chechen War Spill-over: A Political Ethnographic Reassessment of the Upsurge of Violence in the North Caucasus since 2009. PhD Thesis. Canada: University of Ottawa.

Rosenwaike I 1973, Two Generations of Italians in America: Their Fertility Experience. The International Migration Review 7 (3): 271-280.

Szczepanikova A 2014 (236 - 256), Chechen Refugees in Europe: How Three Generations of Women Settle in Exile. In Le Huérou A, Merlin A, Regamey A & Sieca-Kozlowski E (eds.). Chechnya at War and Beyond. London and New York: Routledge.

Stephen E H & Bean F D 1992, Assimilation, Disruption and the Fertility of Mexican-Origin Women in the United States. The International Migration Review 26 (1): 67-88.

Wood E J 2006, The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones. Qualitative Sociology 29 (3): 373–386.

Wunsch D 1986, Survey Research: Determining Sample Size and Representative Response. Business Education Forum 40 (5): 31-34.

Full Text: pdf


  • There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.