Email this article Ecology as a nature-cultural process in Raja Rao’s Kanthapura
Abstract
This article investigates a largely overlooked dimension of Raja Rao’s literary corpus, focusing on the depiction of ecological themes and Indian landscapes in his debut novel, Kanthapura. Drawing on recent scholarship in the Environmental Humanities, it adopts an integrated theoretical framework, combining Hubert Zapf’s Cultural Ecology (2016), the new materialist concept of the nature-culture continuum (Iovino and Opperman 2013), and Niccolò Scaffai’s Ecocritique (2017). This framework is applied to highlight how Rao’s novel integrates material and political issues with a reflection on affective and spiritual connections between the human and the nonhuman world that is rooted in local traditions and beliefs. On a thematic level, what emerges in Kanthapura is the search for a new eco-social balance in a nation on the verge of independence. However, in this work, ecology is not only a narrative theme used to criticise colonial ideologies and eco-social legacies, but it also permeates the text in its narratological and semiotical dimensions, challenging colonial literary conventions. On a textual level, this article intends to discuss the effects of nature (Scaffai 2017) in Kanthapura by analysing the literary strategies employed by the author to depict the interactions between the human and the nonhuman world.
References
Adamson J. and Slovic S. 2009, Guest Editors' Introduction the Shoulders We Stand on: An Introduction to Ethnicity and Ecocriticism, in “MELUS” 34 [2], pp. 5-24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20532676. (15.02.2025).
Albertazzi S. 2013, La letteratura postcoloniale. Dall’Impero alla World Literature, Carocci, Roma.
Ali A. 1979, Progressive View of Art, in Pradhan S. (ed.), Marxist Cultural Movement in India. Chronicles and Documents (1936-47), National Book Agency Pvt. Ltd., Calcutta, pp. 67-83.
Ali S.S. and Das. S. 2024, Writing Disaster in South Asian Literature and Culture: The Limits of Empathy and Cosmopolitan Imagination, Lexington Books, Lanham, Boulder, New York, and London.
Anand M.R. 1940, Untouchable, Penguin Books Ltd, London.
Anjaria U. 2013, Realism in the Twentieth-Century Indian Novel. Colonial Difference and Literary Form. Cambridge UP, Cambridge.
Anjaria U. 2015, Introduction: Literary Pasts, Presents, and Futures, in Anjaria U. (ed.), A History of the Indian Novel in English, Cambridge UP, Cambridge, pp. 1-30.
Åsberg C. 2024, Storying Exposure with the Transversal Methods of Eco-Critique, in Borg C.B. et al. (eds.), Contemporary Ecocritical Methods, pp. 265-278.
Berkes F., Colding J. and Folke C. 2000, Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management, in “Ecological Applications” 10 [5], pp. 1251-1262. https://www.jstor.org/stable/ 2641280 (19.03.2025).
Bertinetti P. 2002, Le mille voci dall’India, Liguori, Roma.
Chattaraj, A. 2022 Sacred Water and Cultures of Worship: Some Observations on the River in India, in “Humanities Bulletin, 4 [2], pp. 168-183. https://journals.lapub.co.uk/index.php/HB/article/view /2147. (15.02.2025).
Crisafulli L. M. e Keir E. (a cura di), 2009, Manuale di letteratura e cultura inglese, Bononia UP, Bologna.
Fuentes A. 2010, Natural Cultural Encounters in Bali: Monkeys, Temples, Tourists, and Ethnoprimatology, in “Cultural Anthropology” 25 [4], pp. 600-624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01071.x (15.02.2025).
Gadgil M. 2023, Ecosystem People, Biosphere People, Ecological Refugees, in “Social Change” 53 [1], pp. 7-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/00490857231152416 (25.09.2024).
Gadgil M. and Guha R. 1995, Ecology and Equity. The Use and Abuse of Nature in Contemporary India, Routledge, London.
Ghosh A. 2021, The Nutmegs Curse. Parable for a Planet in Crisis, John Murray, London.
Glissant È. 2007, Poetica della relazione. Poetica 3 (ed. or. Poétique de la relation (Poétique 0003), 1990, traduzione di Enrica Restori), Quodlibet, Macerata.
Gopal P. 2009, The Indian English Novel. Nation, History, and Narration, Oxford UP.
Iovino S. 2013, Bodies of Naples: Stories, Matter, and the Landscapes of Porosity, in Iovino S. and Opperman S. (eds.), Material Ecocriticism, Indiana UP, Bloomington and Indianapolis, pp. 97-113.
Iovino S. and Opperman S. 2013, Introduction, in Iovino S. and Opperman S. (eds.), Material Ecocriticism, Indiana UP, Bloomington and Indianapolis, pp. 1-17.
Haeckel E. 1866, Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Allgemeine Grundzüge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, mechanisch begründet durch die von Charles Darwin reformirte Descendenz-Theorie, vol. II, Georg Reimer, Berlin.
Haraway D.J. 2003, The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness, Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago.
Huggan G. and Tiffin H. 2015, Postcolonial Ecocriticism. Literature, Animals, Environment (2nd edition), Routledge, London and New York.
Khair T. 1998, Raja Rao and Alien Universality, in “The Journal of Commonwealth Literature”, 33 [1], pp. 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200949803300107 (25.09.2024).
Malik H. 1967, The Marxist Literary Movement in India and Pakistan, in “Journal of Asian Studies” 26 [4], pp. 649-666. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2051241 (25.09.2024).
Mercanti S. 2006, L’india dell’immaginazione nei racconti di Raja Rao, Forum, Udine.
Mercanti S. 2009, The Rose and the Lotus. Partnership Studies in the Works of Raja Rao, Rodopoi, Amsterdam/New York.
Mukherjee M. 1993, The Anxiety of Indianness: Our Novels in English Author(s), in “Economic and Political Weekly”, 28 [48], pp. 2607-2611. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4400456 (25.09.2024).
Mukherjee P. 2010, Postcolonial Environments: Nature, Culture and the Contemporary Indian Novel in English, Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire.
Patel N.A. 2014, Mindful Use: Gandhi's Non-Possessive Property Theory, “Seattle Journal for Social Justice” 13 [2], pp. 290-318. https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj/vol13/iss2/5 (25.09.2024).
Rahman S. 2021, The Environment of South Asia: Beyond Postcolonial Ecocriticism, in “South Asian Review”, 42 [4], pp. 317-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/02759527.2021.1982613 (15.02.2025).
Rao R. 1947, The Cow of the Barricades, Oxford UP.
Rao R. 2014, Kanthapura, Penguins Books India, New Delhi.
Rao. R. 2022, The Sacred Wordsmith: Writing and the Word, Penguins Books India, New Delhi.
Riemenschneider D. 2022, Nature and landscape: an evolutionary psychological analysis of Raja Rao’s writing, in Sethi R. and Alterno L. (eds.), Reading India in a Transnational Era. The Works of Raja Rao, Routledge, London/New York, pp. 170-180.
Scaffai N. 2017, Letteratura e ecologia. Forme e temi di una relazione narrativa, Carocci editore, Roma.
Shingavi S. 2013. The Mahatma Misunderstood. The Politics and Forms of Literary Nationalism in India, Anthem Press, London, New York and Delhi.
Stilz G. 1995, Return to the Jungle? Colonial and Post-colonial Landscapes in Indian-English Literature, in Maes-Jelinek H. et al. (eds.) “A Talent(ed) Digger”, Rodopi, Amsterdam and Atlanta, pp. 324-334.
Taylor C. 2021, Resonance and Critical Theory, in Rosa H. et al. (eds.), “Critical Theory and New Materialisms”. Routledge, London and New York, pp. 42-58.
Vescovi A. 2024, Covert Hinduism, Overt Secularism. A Postsecular Reading of the Indian English Novelistic Tradition, Milano UP, Milano.
Walsh W. 1990, Indian Literature in English, Longman Group, Harlow.
Williams D. R. and Stewart S. I. 1998, Sense of Place: An Elusive Concept That is Finding a Home in Ecosystem Management, in “Journal of Forestry”, 96 [5], pp. 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/ 96.5.18 (15.02.2025).
Zapf H. 2016a, Cultural Ecology of Literature – Literature as Cultural Ecology, in Zapf H. (ed.), Handbook of Ecocriticism and Cultural Ecology, de Gruyter, Berlin/Boston, pp. 135-153.
Zapf H. 2016b, Literature as Cultural Ecology. Sustainable Texts, Bloomsbury, London.
Full Text: PDF
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
