What drives L2 viewers’ informal access to English? A case study on audiovisual input
Abstract
In recent years, several dubbing countries have experienced a change in the way audiovisual (AV) products and other media are accessed in terms of preferred languages and supports. A similar trend appears to be underway in Italy, where younger audiences increasingly access subtitled telecinematic materials and a variety of online media in English. While much research to date has focused on informal second language (L2) practices and the potential of media input for language learning, only a few studies have extensively examined participants’ underlying reasons for exposure. To address this under-researched area, the present study investigates Italian university students’ informal experience with various AV genres and the reasons behind their habits. The data form part of a larger-scale investigation (the PRIN project “The Informalisation of English Language Learning Through the Media”) and were collected through a questionnaire administered to 1,091 students from various disciplines at a medium-sized Italian university. Viewers’ reasons for accessing English-language audiovisuals are examined from both an etic and an emic perspective, based on multiple-choice and open-ended questions, and are complemented by data on the frequency and intensity of access, preferred genres, and viewing modalities. The findings reveal a desire to improve one’s L2 skills and seek knowledge, but also a desire for entertainment and a growing appreciation of English, which enhances viewers’ engagement with AV products. Additionally, accessibility affects viewers’ choices, which differ across AV genres. The study prompts further reflection on the growing media affordances and evolving L2 learning environments in contemporary Italy.
References
Aiello J. 2018, Negotiating Englishes and English-Speaking Identities, Routledge, London.
Alm A. 2023, Engaging with L2 Netflix. Two in(tra)formal learning trajectories, in Toffoli D., Sockett G. and Kusyk M. (Eds.), Language learning and leisure. Informal language learning in the Digital Age, De Gruyter, Berlin.
Arnbjörnsdóttir B. 2018, English exposure, proficiency and use in Iceland, in Arnbjörnsdóttir B. and Ingvarsdóttir H. (Eds.), Language Development across the Life Span. The Impact of English on Education and Work in Iceland, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 35-55.
Arnbjörnsdóttir B. and Ingvarsdóttir H. (Eds.) 2018, Language Development Across the Life Span: The Impact of English on Education and Work in Iceland, Springer International Publishing, Cham.
Arndt H. 2023a, Construction and Validation of a Questionnaire to Study Engagement in Informal Second Language Learning, in “Studies in SLA” 45 [5], pp. 1-25.
Arndt H. 2023b, Behaviour, thoughts, and feelings. Informal second language learning through the lens of task engagement, in Toffoli D., Sockett G. and Kusyk M. (Eds.), Language learning and leisure. Informal language learning in the Digital Age, De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 327-357.
Azzolini D., Campregher S. and Madia J.E. 2022, Formal instruction vs informal exposure. What matters more for teenagers’ acquisition of English as a second language?, in “Research Papers in Education” 37 [2], pp. 153-181.
Benson P. 2021, Language Learning Environments, Multilingual Matters, Bristol.
Berns M., de Bot K., Hasebrink U. 2007, In the Presence of English: Media and European Youth, Springer, New York.
Braun V. and Clarke V. 2022, Thematic analysis: A practical guide, Sage, London.
Caruana S. 2021, An Overview of Audiovisual Input as a Means for Foreign Language Acquisition in Different Contexts, in “Language & Speech” 64 [4], pp. 1018-1036.
Casiraghi L. 2016, ‘A Key’, ‘a Plunge’, ‘an Anchor’: A Study of the Role of English in the Experience of Erasmus Students, unpublished postgraduate thesis, University of Pavia.
Cravidi G. 2016, Accessing English Input Outside University: A Qualitative and Quantitative Investigation, unpublished postgraduate thesis, University of Pavia.
Dawadi S. 2020, Thematic Analysis Approach: A Step by Step Guide for ELT Research Practitioners, in “Journal of NELTA” 25 [1-2], pp. 62-71.
De Riso C. 2021, English Audiovisual Input: A Study of Teenagers’ Habits, Attitudes and Responses to Subtitling Versus Dubbing, in “RILA - Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata”, 53 [1-2], pp. 245-260.
De Riso C. 2023, Out-of-the-classroom English input and informal Second Language Acquisition: A longitudinal study of Italian university students, unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Pavia.
De Wilde V., Brysbaert M. and Eyckmans J. 2020, Learning English through out-of-school exposure. Which levels of language proficiency are attained and which types of input are important?, in “Bilingualism: Language and Cognition” 23 [1], pp. 171-185.
Dörnyei Z. 1998, Motivation in Second and Foreign Language Learning, in “Language Teaching” 31, pp. 117-135.
Dörnyei Z., and Dewaele J.-M. 2023, Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing, Routledge, London.
Dressman M. and Sadler R.W. (Eds.) 2020. The Handbook of Informal Language Learning, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken.
Ghia E. and Pavesi M. 2021, Choosing Between Dubbing and Subtitling in a Changing Landscape, in “Lingue e Linguaggi” 46, pp. 161-77.
Green M.C., Brock T.C. and Kaufman G.F. 2004, Understanding media enjoyment, in “Communication Theory” 14 [4], pp. 11-27.
Hasebrink U., Berns M. and de Bot K. 2007, In the presence of English: A resume after step one of an international study, in Berns M., de Bot K. and Hasebrink U. (Eds.), In the presence of English: Media and European youth, Springer, New York, pp. 111-119.
ISTAT 2018, Rapporto sulla conoscenza 2018. https://www.istat.it/storage/rapporti-tematici/conoscenza2018/Rapportoconoscenza2018.pdf (11.12.2023).
Hulstijn J.H. 2003, Incidental and intentional learning, in Doughty C. and Long M. (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 349-381.
Kusyk M. 2017, Les dynamiques du développement de l’anglais au tarvers d’activités informelles en ligne: une étude exploratoire auprès d’étudiants français et allemands, Doctoral dissertation, University of Strasbourg/Karlsruhe University of Education.
Kusyk M. 2020, Informal English Learning in France, in Dressman M. and Sadler R.W. (Eds.), The Handbook of Informal Language Learning, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, pp. 333-348.
Krüger M. 2023, Media-Related Out-of-School Contact with English in Germany and Switzerland. Frequency, Forms and the Effect on Language Learning, Springer, New York.
Lee J.S. and Dressman M. 2018, When IDLE Hands Make an English Workshop: Informal Digital Learning of English and Language Proficiency, in “TESOL Quarterly” 52 [2], pp. 435-445.
Mariotti C. this volume, Exploring Italian university students’ self-directed exposure to English input in informal settings. Insights into motivation and agency.
Mariotti C. 2024, Exploring Motivation and Agency in Informal Contact with English. An emic investigation of Italian university students, Pavia University Press, Pavia.
Moreno R. and Mayer R. 2007, Interactive multimodal learning environments, in “Educational Psychology Review” 19 [3], pp. 309-326.
Muñoz C. 2020, Boys Like Games and Girls Like Movies. Age and Gender Differences in Out-of-School Contact with English, in “RESLA” 33, pp. 172-202.
Orrego-Carmona D. 2014, Subtitling, Video Consumption and Viewers: The Impact of the Young Audience, in “Translation Spaces” 3, pp. 51-70.
Pavesi M. and Ghia E. 2020, Informal Contact with English: A Case Study of Italian Postgraduate Students, Edizioni ETS, Pisa.
Pavesi M., Ghia E. and Ciabattoni T. 2023, Profiling informal experience with English: An instrument for data collection, in “Lingue e Linguaggi” 59, pp. 303-332.
Pavesi M. this volume, The informalisation of English language learning: A first national research project.
Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. and Fadiga L. 2002, The mirror system in humans, in Stamenov M.I. and Gallese V. (Eds.), Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 37-59.
Sheeran P. and Webb T.L. 2016, The intention-behavior gap, in “Social and Personality Psychology Compass” 10 [9], pp. 503-518.
Sockett G. 2014, The Online Informal Learning of English, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Special Eurobarometer 540 2024, Europeans and their languages, European Commission. https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2979 (11.12.2023).
Sundqvist P. and Sylvén L.K. 2016, Extramural English in Teaching and Learning: From Theory and Research to Practice, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Toffoli D. and Sockett G. 2010, How non-specialist students of English practice informal learning using Web 2.0 tools, in “Asp. La revue du GERAS” 58, pp. 125-144.
Trinder R. 2017, Informal and Deliberate Learning with New Technologies, in “ELT Journal” 71 [4], pp. 401-412.
Tuominen T. 2018, Multi-method research: Reception in context, in Di Giovanni E. and Gambier Y. (Eds.), Reception studies and Audiovisual Translation, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 69-89.
Vanderplank R. 2020, Video and informal language learning, in Dressman M. and Sadler R.W. (Eds.), The Handbook of Informal Language Learning, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, pp. 183-201.
Vorderer P., Steen F.F., Chan E. 2006, Motivation, in Jennings B. and Vorderer P. (Eds.), Psychology of Entertainment, Mahwah, Erlbaum, pp. 2-31.
Wilken N. and Kruger J.L. 2016, Putting the audience in the picture: Mise-en-shot and psychological immersion in audio described film, in “Across Languages and Cultures” 17 [2], pp. 251-270.
Wissmath B., Weibel D. and Groner R. 2009, Dubbing or subtitling? Effects on spatial presence, transportation, flow, and enjoyment, in “Journal of Media Psychology” 21 [3], pp. 114-125.
Full Text: pdf
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.