Email this article Las prestaciones vacías (non-renditions) en la interpretación judicial entre español e italiano: reflexiones teóricas e implicaciones para la práctica docente
Abstract
This study focuses on interpreter non-renditions (Wadensjö 1998) and their acceptability, focusing specifically on the peculiarities of the court setting. Building on these reflections, the article also tackles the teaching practice by looking at the communicative behavior of students when it comes to non-renditions. The schema and interactive frame constructs (Tannen & Wallat 1987) are used to analyze student performance in court hearing simulation sessions as part of an interpreting teaching module in a Master’s degree in Translation and Interpreting taught at the University of Genoa (Italy). Finally, the effectiveness and the limitations of simulation as a teaching tool for the practice of non-renditions are briefly discussed.
References
Amato A. 2007, The interpreter in multi-party medical encounters, en Wadensjö C., Englund Dimitrova B. y Nilsson A. (eds.), The critical link 4: Professionalisation of interpreting in the community, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 27-38.
Angelelli C.V. 2004a, Medical Interpreting and cross-cultural communication, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Angelelli C.V. 2004b, Revisiting the interpreter’s role: A study of conference, court, and medical interpreters in Canada, Mexico and the United States, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
Angelelli C.V. 2017, Anchoring dialogue interpreting in principles of teaching and learning, en Cirillo L., Niemants N. (eds.), Teaching dialogue interpreting. Research-based proposals for higher education, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 29-44.
Arumí Ribas M. 2018, La interpretación dialógica como práctica estratégica. Análisis de la toma de decisiones de cinco intérpretes en los Servicios Públicos, en “Meta”, 63 [1], pp. 118-138.
Baraldi C., Gavioli L. 2007, Dialogue interpreting as intercultural mediation: An analysis in healthcare multicultural settings, en Grein M. y Weigand E. (eds.), Dialogue and culture, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 155–175.
Baraldi C., Gavioli L. 2016, On professional and non-professional interpreting in healthcare services: the case of intercultural mediators, en “European Journal of Applied Linguistics”, 4 [1], pp. 33–55.
Baraldi C., Gavioli L. (eds.) 2012, Coordinating participation in dialogue interpreting, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
Baraldi C., Gavioli L. 2023, La mediazione linguistica nei colloqui tra insegnanti e genitori stranieri, en Caruso V., Maffia M. (eds.), Vecchie e nuove forme di comunicazione diseguale: canali, strutture e modelli, Studi AITLA, Milano, pp. 53-65.
Bateson G. 1972, Steps to an ecology of mind, Ballantine, New York.
Berk-Seligson S. 2002, The bilingual courtroom: court interpreters in the judicial process, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Cheung A.K.F. 2017, Non-renditions in court interpreting. A corpus-based study, en “Babel”, 63 [2], pp. 174–199, 2017.
Cheung A.K.F. 2018, Non-renditions and the court interpreter’s perceived impartiality. A role-play study, en “Interpreting”, 20 [2], pp. 232–258.
Cirillo L. 2012, Managing affective communication in triadic exchanges: Interpreters’ zero-renditions and non-renditions in doctor–patient talk, en Kellett Bidoli C.J. (ed.), Interpreting across genres: Multiple research perspectives, Edizioni Università di Trieste, Trieste, pp. 102-124.
Cirillo L., Niemants N. (eds.) 2017, Teaching dialogue interpreting. Research-based proposals for higher education, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
Cortelazzo M. 1997, Lingua e diritto in Italia: il punto di vista dei linguisti, en Schena L. (ed.), La lingua del diritto, CISU, Milano, pp. 35-50.
Davitti E., Pasquandrea S. 2018, Integrating authentic data in dialogue interpreting education. A teaching unit proposal, en “InTRAlinea Special Issue: Translation and Interpreting for Language Learners (TAIL)”, https://www.intralinea.org/specials/article/integrating_authentic_data_in_dialogue_interpreting_education (2.7.2024).
Directiva 2010/64/UE del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo de 20 de octubre de 2010 relativa al derecho a interpretación y a traducción en los procesos penales. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:280:0001:0007:es:PDF (2.7.2024).
Errico E., Anfuso M., Pagano A. y Pongiglione B. 2021, Il role-play nella formazione in interpretazione dialogica: alcune osservazioni sull’omissione, en “Agon”, 17, pp. 79-115.
EULITA Code of Professional Ethics, 2013. https://www.eulita.eu/wp-content/uploads/files/EULITA-code-London-e.pdf (2.7.2024).
Fernández Pérez M.M. 2015, Propuestas de ejercicios de simulación para la didáctica de la interpretación telefónica, en “MonTI, Monografías de Traducción e Interpretación”, Número especial, 2, pp. 259-279.
Fung, D. 2017, A connected curriculum for higher education, UCL Press, Los Angeles. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1558776/1/A-Connected-Curriculum-for-Higher-Education.pdf (2.7.2024).
Goffman E. 1974, Frame analysis, Harper and Row, New York.
Hale S.B. 2004, The discourse of court interpreting: discourse practices of the law, the witness and the interpreter, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
Hale S.B. 2007, Community interpreting, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Hale S.B., Martschuk N., Ozolins U. y Stern, L. 2017, The effect of interpreting modes on witness credibility assessments, en “Interpreting”, 19 [1], pp. 69-96.
Hale S.B., Gonzalez E. 2017, Teaching legal interpreting at university level: A research-based approach, en Cirillo L., Niemants N. (eds.), Teaching dialogue interpreting. Research-based proposals for higher education, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 200-216.
Hill J. 2008, The everyday language of white racism, Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA.
ISO 20228 Interpreting services — Legal interpreting — Requirements, 2019.
Kadrić M. 2017, Make it different! Teaching interpreting with theatre techniques, en Cirillo L., Niemants N. (eds.), Teaching dialogue interpreting, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 275-292.
Kadrić M., Rennert S. y Mikić D. 2021, Connected education and co-construction of knowledge in a joint course for law and interpreting students, en “Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series: Themes in Translation Studies”, 20, pp. 52–73.
Kadrić M., Stempkowski M. y Havelka I. 2024, Legal interpreting and questioning techniques explained, Routledge, London/New York.
Merlini R. 2007, Teaching dialogue interpreting in Higher Education: A research driven, professionally oriented curriculum design, en Musacchio M.T., Henrot G. (eds.), Tradurre: Professione e Formazione, CLEUP, Padova, pp. 277-306.
Morris R. 1995, The moral dilemmas of court interpreting, en “The Translator”, 1, pp. 25–46.
Ondelli S. 2007, La lingua del diritto: proposta di classificazione di una varietà dell’italiano, Aracne, Roma.
Ondelli S. 2012, La sentenza penale tra azione e narrazione: un’analisi pragmalinguistica, CLEUP, Padova.
Ortega Herráez J.M. 2011, Interpretar para la Justicia, Comares, Granada.
Ortega Herráez J.M. 2022, Interpretación judicial, en ENTI (Enciclopedia de traducción e interpretación), AIETI. https://www.aieti.eu/enti/court_interpreting_SPA/ (2.7.2024).
Pöchhacker F. 2004, Introducing interpreting studies, Routledge, London.
Pöllabauer S. 2004, Interpreting in asylum hearings: issues of role, responsibility and power, en “Interpreting”, 6 [2], pp. 143-180.
Preziosi I., Garwood C. 2017, Training legal interpreters in an imperfect world, en Cirillo L., Niemants N. (eds.), Teaching dialogue interpreting, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 217-237.
Reddy M.J. 1979, The conduit metaphor. A case of frame conflict in our language about language, en Ortony A. (ed.), Metaphor and thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 284-324.
Roy C.B. 2000, Interpreting as a discourse process, Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford.
Takimoto M., Koshiba K. 2009, Interpreter’s non-rendition behaviour and its effect on interaction: A case study of a multi-party interpreting situation, en “Translation and interpreting”, 1[1], pp. 15-26.
Tannen D., Wallat C. 1987, Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview, en “Social psychology quarterly”, 50 [2], pp. 205-216.
Vargas Urpí M. 2015, Dialogue interpreting in multi-party encounters: Two examples from educational settings, en “The Interpreters' Newsletter”, 20, pp. 107-121.
Wadensjö C. 1998, Interpreting as interaction, Longman, London/New York.
Full Text: PDF
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
