Email this article COVID-19 and the Global Health Threat of “V accine Hesitancy”. Analyzing anti-vax Discourses in Brazilian Portuguese and in German on Twitter
Abstract
On March 11, 2020, the WHO declared the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) outbreak as a pandemic. Along with that, discussions regarding vaccination have revived anti-vaccine movements around the globe. Social media play a key role in the spread of disinformation and conspiracy narratives (Maci 2019). Having that in mind, this study’s objective is to describe discursive patterns and arguments of anti-vax campaigns posted on Twitter in Brazilian Portuguese and in German in January 2021 under the hashtags #vacina and #impfung. This piece of research relies on Social Media Critical Discourse Studies (KhosraviNik 2018) and made use of a software-based corpus linguistic approach to identify recurrent themes and textual patterns in anti-vax campaigns. Linguistic resources were examined with a focus on the Transitivity System proposed by Halliday and Matthiessen (2004, 2014). The comparative analysis has shown that the socio-political context in which the users formulate the Tweets clearly shapes the German and Brazilian Portuguese anti-vax Tweets. At the same time, similarities were found in terms of the discursive patterns of anti-vax arguments. These include a strong focus on interrogative statements and a de- and recontextualization of discourses originally put forward by (historically) marginalized groups to construct anti-vax activists as victims of a “dictatorship of pro-vaccine policies”. To address issues such as “vaccine hesitancy”, it is necessary to understand arguments and ideologies that support and are spread through anti-vax movements. Analyzing anti-vax discourses in Brazilian Portuguese and German has been a first step to provide new insights from a context-sensitive and language- comparative perspective.
References
Acevedo R.G. and Pitters J. 2021, Staat versus Querdenker: Eine sozial- und kommunikationspsychologische Betrachtung der Coronavirus-Pandemie in “IUBH Discussion Papers - Sozialwissenschaften”, 3/2021, IUBH Internationale Hochschule, Bad Honnef.
Becker B.F.H., Larson H.J., Bonhoeffer J., van Mulligen E.M., Kors J.A. and Sturkenboom M.C.J.M. 2016, Evaluation of a multinational, multilingual vaccine debate on Twitter, in “Vaccine” 34 [50], pp. 6166–6171.
Fuzer C. and Cabral S.R.S. 2014, Introdução à gramática sistêmico-funcional em língua portuguesa, Mercado de Letras, Campinas.
Couldry N. 2012, Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice, Polity, Cambridge/Malden.
Crystal D. 2006, Language and the Internet (2nd ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Dayter D. 2016, Discursive self in microblogging: Speech acts, stories and self-praise, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
Duden n.d., schwurbeln in “Duden Wörterbuch online”. https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/schwurbeln (28.9.2021).
Eggins S. 2004, Introduction to systemic functional linguistics, A&C Black, London. Fairclough N. 2003, Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research (1. publ.),
Routledge, London.
Fairclough N. 2010, Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2. ed.),
Longman, Harlow.
Federal Association RIAS e.V. 2021 (ed.). Antisemitic incidents in Germany 2020.
https://report- antisemitism.de/documents/Antisemitic_incidents_in_Germany_Annual- Report_Federal_Association_RIAS_2020.pdf (10.01.2022).
Gragnani J. 2021, Bolsonaro Cria Divisões E distrai população com 'Populismo Sanitário' na pandemia, Diz Cientista Político in “BBC News Brasil”. https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/brasil-56759301 (14.01.2022).
Guhl J. and Gerster L. 2020, Crisis and Loss of Control—German-Language Digital Extremism in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic, ISD - Institute for Strategic Dialogue, https://www.isdglobal.org/isd-publications/crisis-and-loss-of-control- german-language-digital-extremism-in-the-context-of-the-covid-19-pandemic/ (17.01.2022).
Gunaratne K., Coomes E.A. and Haghbayan H. 2019, Temporal trends in anti-vaccine discourse on Twitter, in “Vaccine” 37 [35], pp. 4867–4871.
Halliday M.A K. 1976, Anti-Languages in “American Anthropologist” 78 [3], pp. 570– 584.
Halliday M.A.K. 2014, Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4. ed.), Routledge, London.
Halliday M.A.K. and Matthiessen C.M.I.M. 2004, An introduction to functional grammar (3. ed., 1. publ.), Hodder Arnold, London.
Humprecht E. 2019, Where ‘fake news’ flourishes: A comparison across four Western democracies in “Information, Communication & Society” 22 [13], pp. 1973–1988.
Imhoff R. and Lamberty P. 2020, A Bioweapon or a Hoax? The Link Between Distinct Conspiracy Beliefs About the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak and Pandemic Behavior, in “Social Psychological and Personality Science” 11 [8], pp.
–1118.
Kata A. 2010, A postmodern Pandora’s box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the
Internet in “Vaccine” 28 [7], pp. 1709–1716.
Kata A. 2012, Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm – An
overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement, in
“Vaccine” 30 [25], pp. 3778–3789.
Kehoe A. and Gee M. 2011, Social tagging: A new perspective on textual ‘aboutness.’ in
“Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English” 6 [5].
KhosraviNik M. 2018, Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS) in Flowerdew J.
and Richardson J.E. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies
(1st ed), Routledge, London/New York, pp. 582–596.
Leschzyk D.K. 2021, Infodemic in Germany and Brazil: How the AfD and Jair Bolsonaro
are Sowing Distrust During the Corona Pandemic in “Zeitschrift Für
Literaturwissenschaft Und Linguistik” 51 [3], pp. 477–503.
Lucia I. and Fernandes L. 2021, Movimento Antivacina no Brasil: Entenda Esse
Fenômeno e seu fortalecimento durante a pandemia, in “Lamparina”. https://sites.ufop.br/lamparina/blog/movimento-antivacina-no-brasil-entenda-esse- fen%C3%B4meno-e-seu-fortalecimento-durante (14.12022).
Ma J. and Stahl L. 2017, A multimodal critical discourse analysis of anti-vaccination information on Facebook, in “Library & Information Science Research” 39, pp. 303–310.
Maci S. 2019, Discourse Strategies of Fake News in the Anti-vax Campaign* in “Lingue Culture Mediazioni - Languages Cultures Mediation” 6, pp. 15-43.
Manakas M. 2021, Warum die Verschwörungsmentalität im deutschsprachigen Raum so ausgeprägt ist, in „DER STANDARD“. https://www.derstandard.at/story/2000132200963/warum-die- verschwoerungsmentalitaet-im-deutschsprachigen-raum-so-ausgepraegt-ist (10.01.2022).
Meyer S.B., Violette R., Aggarwal R., Simeoni M., MacDougall H. and Waite N. 2019,
Vaccine hesitancy and Web 2.0: Exploring how attitudes and beliefs about influenza vaccination are exchanged in online threaded user comments in “Vaccine” 37 [13], pp. 1769–1774.
Moraes M.P., de Oliveira Sampaio J. and Charles A.C. 2019, Data mining applied in fake news classification through textual patterns in “Proceedings of the 25th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web”, pp. 321-324.
Ruiz J.B. and Bell R.A. 2014, Understanding vaccination resistance: Vaccine search term selection bias and the valence of retrieved information in “Vaccine” 32 [44], 5776– 5780.
Sanders C. and Burnett K. 2019, The neoliberal roots of modern vaccine hesitancy in “Journal of Health and Social Sciences” 4 [2], pp. 149-156.
Silva H.M. 2021, The Brazilian scientific denialism through the American Journal of Medicine in “The American Journal of Medicine” 134 [4], pp. 415–416.
Steiner E. and Teich E. 2014, Metafunctional profile of the grammar of German in Caffarel-Cayron A., Martin J.R. and Matthiessen C.M.I.M. (eds), Language typology: a functional perspective, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp. 139-184.
Twitter 2021, COVID-19 misleading information policy in “Twitter Help Center”. https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/medical-misinformation-policy (29.9.2021).
World Health Organization n.d., Ten threats to global health in 2019 in “WHO Newsroom
Spotlight”. https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-
in-2019 (29.9.2021).
World Health Organization, 2020, Managing the COVID-19 infodemic: Promoting
healthy behaviours and mitigating the harm from misinformation and disinformation. https://www.who.int/news/item/23-09-2020-managing-the-covid-19- infodemic-promoting-healthy-behaviours-and-mitigating-the-harm-from- misinformation-and-disinformation (17.01.2022).
Zappavigna M. 2015, Searchable talk: The linguistic functions of hashtags in “Social Semiotics” 25 [3], pp. 274–291.
Zappavigna M. 2012, The Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web, Continuum International Pub. Group, London/New Y ork.
Verein ZARA Zivilcourage and Anti-Rassismus-Arbeit 2021 (ed.), Rassismus Report 2020, Analyse zu rassistischen Übergriffen & Strukturen in Österreich, https://assets.zara.or.at/media/rassismusreport/ZARA-Rassismus_Report_2020.pdf (17.01.2022).
Zimmerman R.K., Wolfe R.M., Fox D.E., Fox J.R., Nowalk M.P., Troy J.A. and Sharp L.K. 2005, Vaccine Criticism on the World Wide Web in “Journal of Medical Internet Research” 7 [2], e17.
Żuk P., Żuk P. and Lisiewicz-Jakubaszko J. 2019, The anti-vaccine movement in Poland: The socio-cultural conditions of the opposition to vaccination and threats to public health in “Vaccine” 37 [11], pp. 1491–1494.
Full Text: PDF
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
