The Racist Pandemic. A Semantico-Pragmatic Study of Anti-Asian Overtones in COVID-19-related Twitter Discourse


Abstract


2019 saw the emergence of a new human pathogen, SARS-CoV-2, which causes a disease currently known as COVID-19. There are, however, other names which expose the Asian origin of the virus. These ways of reference – although discouraged by the scientific community – still remain in frequent use in various COVID-19-related discourses. Such names explicitly point to the geographical place of origin of the virus, but at the same time are likely to provoke associations and solidify pre-existing stereotypes about Asians as well as strengthen misconceptions about the virus itself. The intention of the use of terms such as Chinese virus may be purely referential, but they are, nonetheless, marked with accusatory or downright racist overtones. The present paper is maintained within the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) framework (van Dijk 1993), as CDA aims specifically to examine the ways in which discourses shape power relations, maintain social stigmas, perpetuate stereotypes and widen inequalities. We use CDA as a framework for conducting a semantic analysis of expressions such as Asian virus, Chinese virus, Sinovirus or Wuhan virus used on Twitter. Specifically, we intend to select the usages that are unequivocally intentional and whose aim is not only to emphasise the geographical origin of the virus, but also to justify blaming China for the global pandemic that SARS-CoV-2 eventually has caused. We have found that potentially harmful names such as Chinese virus have been used intentionally and are accompanied by even more blatant cases of defamatory and accusatory language targeting the Chinese. It is even more significant, as the proliferation of anti-Asian hate speech has culminated in a serious aftermath in the form of anti-Asian violence, especially in the US.


DOI Code: 10.1285/i22390359v47p225

Keywords: COVID-19; Twitter discourse; Critical Discourse Analysis; meaning potentials; polarising discourse

References


AlAfnan M.A. 2020, COVID 19-The Foreign Virus: Media Bias, Ideology and Dominance in Chinese and American Newspaper Articles, in “International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature” 9 [1], pp. 56–60.

Altoaimy L. 2018, Driving Change on Twitter: A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis of the Twitter Debates on the Saudi Ban on Women Driving, in “Social Sciences” 7 [5], p. 81.

Ascher D.L. and Noble S.U. 2019, Unmasking Hate on Twitter: Disrupting Anonymity by Tracking Trolls, in Brison S.J. and Gelber K. (eds), Free Speech in the Digital Age, Oxford University Press, New York doi:10.1093/oso/9780190883591.003.0011.

Asif M., Zhiyong D., Iram A., Nisar. M., 2021, Linguistic analysis of neologism related to coronavirus (COVID-19) in “Social Sciences & Humanities Open” 4 [1] pp. 100201. Augustyn R., and Prażmo E.M. 2020, The Spread of Chinese Virus in the Internet Discourse: A Cognitive Semantic Analysis, in “GEMA Online® Journal of Language

Studies” 20 [4] doi:10.17576/gema-2020-2004-12.

Bhatt P. and Pickering C.M.. 2021, Public Perceptions about Nepalese National Parks: A

Global Twitter Discourse Analysis, in “Society & Natural Resources” 34 [6] pp. 685–

Boot A.B.,Tjong Kim Sang E., Dijkstra K., Zwaan R.A.. 2019, How character limit affects

language usage in tweets, in “Palgrave Communications” 5 [1] pp. 1–13.

Brown G. and Marinthe G. 2021, “The Chinese virus”: How COVID-19’s transmission context and fear affect negative attitudes toward Chinese people, in “Peace and

Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology” doi:10.1037/pac0000581.

Budhwani H. and Sun R. 2020, Creating COVID-19 Stigma by Referencing the Novel Coronavirus as the “Chinese virus” on Twitter: Quantitative Analysis of Social Media

Data, in “Journal of Medical Internet Research” 22 [5] doi:10.2196/19301. Calabrese C., Ding J., Millam B., Barnett G.A. 2020, The Uproar Over Gene-Edited Babies: A Semantic Network Analysis of CRISPR on Twitter, in “Environmental

Communication” 14 [7] pp. 954–970.

Chen L., Lyu, H., Yang T., Wang Y., Luo J. 2020, In the Eyes of the Beholder: Sentiment

and Topic Analyses on Social Media Use of Neutral and Controversial Terms for COVID-19, in “ArXiv:2004.10225” [Cs] Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.10225.

Chen L., Lyu H., T. Yang T., Wang Y., Luo J. 2021, Fine-Grained Analysis of the Use of Neutral and Controversial Terms for COVID-19 on Social Media, in Thomson R., Hussain M.N., Dancy C. and Pyke A. (eds) Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 57–67.

Daghigh A.J., Sanatifar S., Awang R. 2018, Modeling van Dijk’s Ideological Square in Translation Studies: Investigating Manipulation in Political Discourse Translation, in “InTRAlinea” 20.

Demata M. 2021, Keeping the Threat Out Trump’s Discourse, the Wall and the “Other”, in “Altre Modernità” [25], pp. 270–286.

Dubey A.D. 2020, The Resurgence of Cyber Racism During the COVID-19 Pandemic and its Aftereffects: Analysis of Sentiments and Emotions in Tweets, in “JMIR Public Health and Surveillance” 6 [4] doi:10.2196/19833.

Gee G.C., Ro M.J., Rimoin A.W.. 2020, Seven Reasons to Care About Racism and COVID- 19 and Seven Things to Do to Stop It, in “American Journal of Public Health” 110 [7] pp. 954–955.

Gonsalves C.A., McGannon K.R., Pegoraro A. 2021, A critical discourse analysis of gendered cardiovascular disease meanings of the #MoreMoments campaign on Twitter, in “Journal of Health Psychology” 26 [10] pp. 1471–1481.

Hswen, Y., Xu X., Hing A., Hawkins J.B., Brownstein J.S. , Gee G.C. 2021, Association of “#covid19” Versus “#chinesevirus” With Anti-Asian Sentiments on Twitter: March 9–23, 2020, “American Journal of Public Health” 111 [5] pp. 956–964.

Jaidka, K., Zhou A., Lelkes Y. . 2019, Brevity is the Soul of Twitter: The Constraint Affordance and Political Discussion, in “Journal of Communication” 69 [4] pp. 345– 372.

Kim, E.H.-J., Jeong Y.K., Kim Y., Kang K.Y., Song M. 2016, Topic-based content and sentiment analysis of Ebola virus on Twitter and in the news, in “Journal of Information Science” 42[6] pp. 763–781.

Lwin MO, Lu J, Sheldenkar A, Schulz PJ, Shin W, Gupta R, Yang Y2020, Global Sentiments Surrounding the COVID-19 Pandemic on Twitter: Analysis of Twitter Trends, in “JMIR Public Health and Surveillance” 6 [2]: e19447.

Mamidi R., Miller M. , Banerjee T. , Romine W. , Sheth A.. 2019, Identifying Key Topics Bearing Negative Sentiment on Twitter: Insights Concerning the 2015-2016 Zika Epidemic, in “JMIR Public Health and Surveillance” 5 [2], e11036.

Mondal, M., Silva L.A., Correa D. , Benevenuto F. . 2018, Characterizing usage of explicit hate expressions in social media, in “New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia” 24 [2], pp. 110–130.

Norén K. and Linell P. 2007, Meaning potentials and the interaction between lexis and contexts: An empirical substantiation, in “Pragmatics” 17 [3] pp. 387–416.

Olza I., V. Koller, Ibarretxe-Antuñano I., Pérez-Sobrino P., Semino E. 2021, The #ReframeCovid initiative: From Twitter to society via metaphor, in “Metaphor and the Social World” 1 1[1] pp. 99–121.

Osterbur M. and Kiel C. 2021, Tweeting in echo chambers? Analyzing Twitter discourse between American Jewish interest groups,in “Journal of Information Technology & Politics” 18 [2], pp. 194–213.

Pereira-Kohatsu J.C., Quijano-Sánchez L., Liberatore F., Camacho-Collados M. 2019, Detecting and Monitoring Hate Speech in Twitter,in “Sensors” 19 [21] p. 4654. Pitsilis G.K., Ramampiaro H., Langseth H. 2018, Effective hate-speech detection in Twitter

data using recurrent neural networks, in “Applied Intelligence” 48 [12] pp. 4730–

Prażmo E. 2017, Deliberately misleading or unintentionally ambiguous?: A cognitive

linguistic view on defective codes of memory,in “Pragmatics & Cognition” 24 [3] pp.

–372.

Roccetti M., Marfia G., Salomoni P., Prandi C., Zagari R.M., . Montagnani M. 2017,

Attitudes of Crohn’s Disease Patients: Infodemiology Case Study and Sentiment Analysis of Facebook and Twitter Posts, in “JMIR Public Health and Surveillance” 3 [3] e7004.

Roig–Marín A. 2021. English-based coroneologisms: A short survey of our Covid-19- related vocabulary, in “English Today” 37 [4] pp. 193–195.

Su Z., McDonnell D., Ahmad J., Cheshmehzangi A., Li X., Meyer K., Cai Y., Yang L., Xiang Y.T. 2020, Time to stop the use of ‘Wuhan virus’, ‘China virus’ or ‘Chinese virus’ across the scientific community, in “BMJ Global Health” 5 [9], e003746.

Tabri N., Hollingshead S., Wohl M.J.A. 2020, Framing COVID-19 as an Existential Threat Predicts Anxious Arousal and Prejudice towards Chinese People (preprint)PsyArXiv Retrieved from https://osf.io/mpbtr.

van Dijk T. 1993, Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis, in “Discourse & Society” 4 [2], pp. 249–283.

van Dijk T. 1998, Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach, Sage, London. Xu C., and LiuY. 2021, Does mislabeling COVID-19 elicit the perception of threat and reduce blame?, in “Journal of Behavioral Public Administration” 4 [2] doi:10.30636/jbpa.42.225.

Ziems C., He B., Soni S., Kumar S. 2020, Racism is a Virus: Anti-Asian Hate and Counterhate in Social Media during the COVID-19 Crisis, in “ArXiv:2005.12423 [Physics]” Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.12423.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.