Email this article Rumor has it. The COVID-19 Infodemic as the Repository of Conspiracy
Abstract
Access to the right information, at the right time and through trustworthy sources, is not only critical but necessary, especially during health-related emergencies such as the current COVID-19 pandemic which has forced billions of people into isolation. During this worldwide phenomenon, digital access to information has been at its highest, but it has also posed new challenges such as the surge of an infodemic (Zarocostas 2020) or an overabundance of information generated by the practices of eliciting and disseminating half-truths and conspiracy theories especially via independent or alternative media outlets (Del Vicario et al. 2019). By focusing on the US media landscape, this study intends to explore the critical workings of such platforms, and provide evidence of how they support and intensify the infodemic phenomenon by acting as seed sources or primary online providers of (mis)information with direct access to secondary sources such as social media accounts and other knowledge-sharing platforms. In particular, the study argues that these seed sources appeal to the constitutional principle of freedom of expression to justify a conspiratorial representation of COVID-19 disseminated in its many variants, namely fake news, rumors, scams, stigma, magical cures, and alarming conspiracy claims. By drawing from critical discourse studies, and social semiotics theory (van Leeuwen 2005), and by adopting a multimodal discourse analysis approach (Kress, van Leeuwen 2020; Machin, Mayr 2012; Ledin, Machin 2018), the study investigates a corpus of linguistic and other semiotic resources collected from the London Real and its affiliated Digital Freedom Platform, both held responsible for the dissemination of the highly contested Plandemic video series containing conspiratorial content accused of influencing public opinion (Del Vicario et al. 2016; Kulshrestha et al. 2017).
References
Alam F., Shaar S., Dalvi F., Sajjad H., Nikolov A., Mubarak H., Da San Martino G., Abdelali A., Durrani N., Darwish K., Al-Homaid A., Zaghouani W., Caselli T., Danoe G., Stolk F., Bruntink B. and Nakov, P. 2021, Fighting the COVID-19 infodemic: modeling the perspective of journalists, fact-checkers, social media platforms, policy makers, and the society, in “Preprint arXiv:2005.00033v5”. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.00033.pdf. (1.9.2021).
Cammaerts B. 2007, Jamming the Political: Beyond Counter-hegemonic Practices, Continuum, in “Journal of Media and Cultural Studies” 21 [1], pp. 71-90.
Carroll L. 1946, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. Random House, New York/NY.
Caumanns U. 2016, Performing and communicating conspiracy theories: Stalinist show trials in eastern Europe during the Cold War, in “Lexia” 23 [4], pp. 269–288.
Coady D. 2006, Conspiracy theories: The philosophical debate. Ashgate, Farnham, United Kingdom.
Dean K.L. and Forray M.J. 2017, Tumbling Down the Rabbit Hole: Innovation and
Change in Context in “Journal of Management Education” 41 [3], pp. 311-315.
Del Vicario M.D., Quattrociocchi W., Scala A. and Zollo F. 2019, Polarization and fake news: early warning of potential misinformation targets, in ACM Trans. Web (TWEB)” 13, pp. 1-22.
Del Vicario M., Bessi A. and Zollo F. 2016, The spreading of misinformation online, in “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences” 113, pp. 554-559.
Douglas K., Uscinski E.J., Sutton R., Cichocka A. and Nefes T. 2019, Understanding Conspiracy Theories, in “Advances in Political Psychology” 40 [1]. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/pops.12568. (1.9.2021).
Flynn D.J., Nyhan B. and Reifler J. 2017, The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics, in “Advances in Political Psychology” 38 [S1], pp. 127-150.
Jakesch M., Koren M., Evtushenko A. and Naaman M. 2018, The role of source, headline and expressive responding in political news evaluation, in “Social Science Research Network”. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract1⁄43306403 (9.4.2021).
Fairclough N. 2003, Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research, Routledge, London/New York.
Fairclough N. and Wodak R. 1997. Critical Discourse Analysis, in van Dijk, T. (ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction [2], Sage, London, pp. 258-284.
Grice HP. 1975, Logic and Conversation. Speech Acts, Academic Press, New York.
Halliday M.A.K. 1994, An Introduction to Functional Grammar, Edward Arnold, London.
Kaplan AM. And Haenlein M. 2010, Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media, in “Business Horizons” 53 [1], pp. 59-68.
Kress G. and van Leeuwen T. 2020, Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, Routledge, London.
Kruglanski A., Molinario E. and Lemay E. 2021. Coping with COVID-19-induced threats to self, in “Group Processes and Intergroup Relations” 24, pp. 284-289.
Kulshrestha J., Eslami M., Messias J., Zafar M.B., Ghosh S., Gummadi K. and Karahalios K. 2017, Quantifying search bias: Investigating sources of bias for political searches in social media, in “Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing”. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1704.01347.pdf (4.3.2021).
Ledin P. and Machin D. 2018, Doing Visual Analysis, Sage, London.
Machin D. and Mayr A. 2012, How to do Critical Discourse Analysis: A multimodal introduction, Sage, London.
Mouffe C. 1999, Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism?, in “Social Research” 66 [3], pp. 746-758.
Renucci J.F. 1994, Introduction to the European Convention on Human Rights – Collected texts, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg.
Shneiderman B., Preece J. and Pirolli P. 2011, Realizing the value of social media requires innovative computing research, in “Communications of the ACM” 54 [9], pp, 34.
van Leeuwen T. 1996, The representation of social actors, in Caldas-Coulthard, C.R. and Coulthard, M. (eds.), Text and Practices: readings in critical discourse analysis, Routledge, London, pp. 32-70.
van Leeuwen T. 2005, Introducing social semiotics. Routledge, London/New York.
Vosoughi S., Roy D. and Aral S. 2018, The spread of true and false news online, in “Science” [359], pp. 1146-1151.
Wodak R. 2009, Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology, in Wodak R. and Meyer M. (eds.), Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd ed.), Sage, London, pp. 1-33.
Zarocostas J. 2020, How to fight an infodemic, in “The Lancet” 395 [10225], pp. 676. https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0140-6736%2820%2930461-X (4.6.2021).
Zollo F. 2019, Dealing with digital misinformation: A polarised context of narratives and tribes, in “EFSA Journal” 17 [S1]e170720. https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170720 (4.9.2021)
Full Text: PDF
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
