Email this article Science-related Populism and Social Actors in Martin Geddes’ Early Representations of COVID-19. A Case Study
Abstract
This article focuses on five blogs written by British conspiracy theorist Martin Geddes, available on his personal website. The blogs were written from March to December 2020 and represent an early testimony of COVID-19 scepticism. The article aims to analyse Geddes’ conspirational counter-narrative of the coronavirus syndemic by focusing on four elements: the generic characteristics of the corpus, Geddes’ construal of ethos, his texts’ connection to the theoretical framework of science-related populism and, lastly, the representation of select social actors in the corpus and how such representation sustains Geddes’ conspirational arguments. These elements provide insight into the idiom of conspiracy theorists and their construction of counter-information and counter- knowledge.
References
Aiello L.M., Quercia D., Zhou K., Constantinides M., Šćepanović S., Joglekar S. 2021,
How epidemic psychology works on social media: evolution of responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, in “Humanities and Social Sciences Communications” 8, pp. 1-15.
Amossy R. 2001, Ethos at the Crossroads of Disciplines: Rhetorics, Pragmatics, Sociology, in “Poetics Today” 22 [1], pp.1-23.
Bernard T. 2018, The Discursive Representation of Social Actors in the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Integrated Annual (IA) Reports of Two South African Mining Companies, in “Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines” 10 [1], pp. 81-97.
Bloom M., Moskalenko S. 2021, Pastels and Pedophiles: Inside the Mind of QAnon, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Boyle P. 2021, How are COVID-19 Deaths Counted? It’s complicated, in “The Association of American Medical Colleges”, https://www.aamc.org/news- insights/how-are-covid-19-deaths-counted-it-s-complicated.
Carrion-Alvarez D., Tijerina-Salina P.X. 2020, Fake News in COVID-19: A Perspective, in “Health Promotion Perspectives” 10 [4], pp. 290-291.
KhosraviNik M. 2017, Right-Wing Populism in the West: Social Media Discourse and Echo Chambers, in “Insight Turkey” 19 [3], pp. 53-68.
KhosraviNik M. 2018, Social Media Techno-Discursive Design, Affective Communication and Contemporary Politics, in “Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences”, 11, pp. 427-442.
Koller V. 2009, Analysing Collective Identity in Discourse: Social Actors and Contexts, in “Semen – Revue de sémio-linguistique des textes et discours” 27, https://journals.openedition.org/semen/8877.
Lirola Martínez M. 2017, Linguistic and Visual Strategies for portraying Immigrants as People Deprived of Human Rights, in “Social Semiotics” 27, pp. 21-38.
Mede N. G., Schäfer M. S. 2020, Science-related Populism: Conceptualizing populist demands towards science, in “Public Understanding of Science” 29 [5], pp. 473-491. Milanović B. (2020) The first global event in the history of humankind. “IPS – International Politics and Society”, https://www.ips-
journal.eu/topics/democracy/the-first-global-event-in-the-history-of-humankind-
/.
Miller C.B., Shepherd D. 2004, Blogging as Social Action: A Genre Analysis of the
Weblog, in Gurak, L. Antonijevic, S. (eds.), Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric, Community, and the Culture of Weblogs, University of Minnesota Libraries, Minneapolis, pp. 1-21.
Oliver D. 2021, Mistruths and Misunderstandings about COVID-19 Death Numbers, in “The BMJ” 372 [352], pp. 1-2.
Rashidi N., Ghaedsharafi S. 2015, An Investigation into the Culture and Social Actors Representation in Summit Series ELT Textbooks within van Leeuwen’s 1196 Framework, in “SAGE Open” 5 [1], pp. 1-10.
Singer, M., Clair, S. 2003, Syndemics and Public Health: Reconceptualizing Disease in Bio-Social Context, in “Medical Anthropology Quarterly” 17 [4], pp. 423-441. Singer, M., Rylko-Bauer, B. 2021, The Syndemic and Structural Violence of the COVID
Pandemic: Anthropological Insights on a Crisis, in “Open Anthropological Research” 1, pp. 7-32.
Slater T. A. et al. 2020, Dying “due to” or “with” COVID-19: A Cause of Death Analysis in Hospitalised Patients, in Clinical Medicine, 20, pp. 189-190.
Steffens N.K., Haslam N.A. 2013, Power Through ‘Us’: Leaders’ Use of We-Referencing Language Predicts Election Victory, in “PLoS One” 8 [10], pp. 1-6.
Van Leeuwen, T. 2008, Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Vériter, S. L., Bjola, C., and Koops J. A. 2020, Tackling COVID-19 Disinformation: Internal and External Challenges for the European Union, in “The Hague Journal of Diplomacy” 15, pp. 569-582.
Waisbord S. 2018, The elective affinity between post-truth communication and populist politics, in “Communication Research and Practice” 4 [1], pp. 17–34.
Ylä-Anttila, T. 2018, Populist knowledge: “Post-truth” repertoires of contesting epistemic authorities, in “European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology” 5 [4], pp.356- 388.
Full Text: PDF
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
