Accountability practices in research and publication ethics on the web. Linguistic and discursive features
Abstract
References
Askehave I., Swales J.M. 2001, Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution, in “Applied Linguistics” 22 [2], pp. 195-212.
Barrett W. 2004, Responsibility, accountability and corporate activity, in “Online Opinion: Australia’s E-Journal of Social and Political Debate” http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=2480.
Bazerman C. 1994, Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions, in Freedman A. and Medway P. (eds.), Genre and the New Rhetoric, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 79-101.
Bhatia V.K. 2004, Worlds of Written Discourse, Continuum, London/New York.
Bhatia V.K. 2017, Critical Genre Analysis: Investigating Interdiscursive Performance in Professional Communication, Routledge, London/New York.
Bax S. 2011, Discourse and Genre: Analysing Language in Context, Palgrave, Basingstoke/New York.
Beck U. 2000, World Risk Society, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Biber D., Connor U. and Upton T.A. 2007, Discourse on the Move, Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Biber D., Johansson S., Leech G., Conrad S. and Finegan E. 1999, Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English, Pearson Education, London.
Biber D. and Conrard S. 2009, Register, Genre and Style, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Declerck R. and Reed S. 2001, Conditionals: A Comprehensive Empirical Analysis, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
DuBois J.M., Anderson E.E., and Chibnall J. 2013, Assessing the need for a research ethics remediation program, in “Clinical and Translational Science” 6 [3], pp. 209-213.
Evetts J. 2011, Sociological analysis of professionalism: Past, present and future, in “Comparative Sociology” 10, pp. 1-37.
Fanelli D. 2009, How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data, in “PLoS One” 4. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
Fanelli D., Costas R., Fang F., Casadevall A. and Bik E. 2019, Testing hypotheses on risk factors for scientific misconduct via matched-control analysis of papers containing problematic image duplications, in “Science and Engineering Ethics” 25, pp. 771-789.
Fairclough N. 1993, Discourse and Social Change, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Fairclough N. 2001, Language and Power, Longman, London.
Fairclough N. 2003, Analysing Discourse: Text Analysis for Social Research, Routledge, London.
Garzone G. and Santulli F. 2004, What can corpus linguistics do for critical discourse analysis?, in Partington A., Morley J. and Haarman L. (eds.), Corpora and Discourse, Peter Lang, Bern, pp. 352-368.
Goffman E. 1959, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Doubleday, New York.
Halliday M.A.K. and Matthiessen C. 2004, An Introduction to Functional Grammar, Arnold, London.
Hieronymi P. 2004, The force and fairness of blame, in “Philosophical Perspectives” 18 [1], pp. 115-148.
Hunston S. and Thompson G. 2000, Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourses, Oxford University Press, New York.
Hyland K. 1994, Hedging in academic writing and ESP textbooks, in “English for Specific Purposes” 13 [3], pp. 239-256.
Hyland K. 1998, Hedging in Scientific Research, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Hyland K. 2005, Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse, in “Discourse Studies” 7 [2], pp. 173-192.
Kanoksilapatham B. 2005, Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles, in “English for Specific Purposes” 24, pp. 269-292.
Leech G. 2005, Meaning and the English Verbs. Longman, London.
Luhmann N. 1979, Trust and Power, Wiley, London.
Mills S. 2003, Gender and Politeness, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Prior P. 2001, Voices in text, mind and society: Sociohistoric accounts of discourse acquisition and use, in “Journal of Second Language Writing” 1 [2], pp. 55-81.
Sarangi S. and Brookes-Howell L. 2006, Recontextualising the familial lifeworld in genetic counselling case notes, in Gotti M. and Salagar-Meyer F. (eds), Advances in Medical Discourse Analysis: Oral and Written Contexts, Peter Lang, Bern, pp. 197-225.
Sarangi S. and Candlin C.N. 2003, Categorization and explanation of risk: A discourse analytical perspective, in “Health, Risk & Society” 5 [2], pp. 115-124.
Steneck N.H. 2006, Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions, in “Science and Engineering Ethics” 12 [1], pp. 53-74.
Swales J.M. 1990, Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Swales J.M. 2004, Research Genres: Explorations and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Toolan M. 2001, Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction, Routledge, London.
Yates J. and Orlikowski J.W. 1992, Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media, in “Academy of Management Review” 17 [2], pp. 299-326.
Full Text: PDF
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.