Toxicity exposed in the Greenpeace Toxic Tech campaign
Abstract
References
Anthony L. 2009, Issues in the Design and Development of Software Tools for Corpus Studies: The Case for Collaboration, in Baker P. (ed.), Contemporary Corpus Linguistics, Continuum, London/New York, pp. 87-104.
Bondi M., Cacchiani S. and Mazzi D. (eds.) 2015, Discourse In and Through the Media: Recontextualizing and Reconceptualizing Expert Discourse, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne.
Bortoluzzi M. 2010, Energy and its Double: A Case-study in Critical Multimodal Discourse Analysis, in Swain E. (ed.), Thresholds and Potentialities of Systemic Functional Linguistics: Multilingual, Multimodal and Other Specialised Discourses, EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, Trieste, pp. 158-181.
Brambilla E. 2019, Prototypical Argumentative Patterns in Activist Discourse. The case of the Greenpeace Detox Campaign, in van Eemeren F.H. and Garssen B. (eds.), Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical Studies about Argumentative Discourse in Context, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 173-194.
Brunner E.A. and DeLuca K.M. 2017, The Argumentative Force of Image Networks: Greenpeace’s Panmediated Global Detox Campaign, in “Argumentation and Advocacy” 52, pp. 281-299.
Catenaccio P. 2012, Understanding CSR Discourse: Insights from Linguistics and Discourse Analysis, Arcipelago Edizioni, Milan.
Culpeper J. and Demmen J. 2015, Keywords, in Biber D. and Reppen R. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 90-105.
Degano C. 2017, Visual Arguments in Activists’ Campaigns. A Pragmadialectical Perspective, in Ilie C. and Garzone G. (eds.), Argumentation across Communities of Practice: Multi-disciplinary Perspectives, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 291-315.
Garssen B. 2017, The Role of Pragmatic Problem-solving Argumentation in Plenary Debate in the European Parliament, in van Eemeren F.H. (ed.), Prototypical Argumentative Patterns: Exploring the Relationship between Argumentative Discourse and Institutional Context, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 31-51.
Garzone G. 2006, Perspectives on ESP and Popularization, CUEM, Milan.
Garzone G. and Santulli F. 2004, What can Corpus Linguistics do for Critical Discourse Analysis?, in Partington A., Morley J. and Haarman L. (eds.), Corpora and Discourse. Collection Linguistic Insights. Studies in Language and Communication, Peter Lang, Bern, pp. 351-368.
Greenpeace 2008, Toxic Tech: Not in Our Backyard. Uncovering the Hidden Flows of e-Waste, Greenpeace International, Amsterdam. https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/wp-content/uploads/legacy/Global/usa/report/2008/2/toxic-tech-not-in-our-backyard.pdf (4.1.2018).
Greenpeace 2012, Guide to Greener Electronics 18. https://www.greenpeace.org/archive-new-zealand/en/Guide-to-Greener-Electronics/18th-Edition/ (5.11.2019).
Greenpeace 2014, Green Gadgets: Designing the Future. The Path to Greener Electronics, Greenpeace International, Amsterdam. https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Green-Gadgets.pdf (5.11.2019).
Kress G. and van Leeuwen T. 2006, Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design, Routledge, London.
Post S.G. 2004, Encyclopedia of Bioethics, Macmillan Publishers, New York.
Talbot M. 2012, Bioethics. An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
van Eemeren F.H. 2010, Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
van Eemeren F.H. 2017, Argumentative Patterns Viewed from a Pragma-dialectical Perspective, in van Eemeren F.H. (ed.), Prototypical Argumentative Patterns: Exploring the Relationship between Argumentative Discourse and Institutional Context, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 7-30.
van Eemeren F.H. and Grootendorst R. 1984, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.
Wodak R. 2009, The Discourse of Politics in Action. Politics as Usual, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Full Text: PDF
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.