Las imágenes lingüísticas del paisaje urbano de la migración. Una reflexión metodológica de enfoque pragmático


Abstract


Abstract – In this article I approach the epistemological vitality of the Linguistic Landscape and address the question of the scientific contribution of the linguistic image to investigate migration as a characterizing element of complexity and dynamism of the city system. The theoretical perspective I adopt is based on Pragmatics and I take advantage of the data from a corpus of texts collected in Milan from 2014 to exemplify it. On the one hand, I argue the referential instability of the images of the Linguistic Landscape; on the other hand, I underline their possible systemic sensitivity. I note by way of conclusion that some of the methodological concerns of Pragmatics can help the Linguistic Landscape to focus its epistemological agenda, as well as some instances of the latter could bring new lymph to some stagnant issues of Pragmatics.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i22390359v25p81

Keywords: Linguistic Landscape; postmodern Pragmatics; superdiversity; migration; methodology

References


Ariolfo R. 2017, Visibilidad y percepción del español en el paisaje lingüístico genovés, en “Lingue e Linguaggi” 21, pp. 7-25.

Arnaut K. and Spotti M. 2014, Superdiversity Discourse, in “Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies” 122, s.p.

Austin J.L. 1962, How to Do Things with Words, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Backhaus P. 2007, Linguistic Landscapes: A Comparative Study of Urban Multilinguilism in Tokyo, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon/Buffalo/Toronto.

Bagna C., Barni M. e Vedovelli M. 2007, Lingue immigrate in contatto con lo spazio linguistico italiano: il caso di Roma, en “Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata” XXXVI [2], pp. 333-364.

Barni M. and Bagna C. 2015, The Critical Turn in LL: New Methodologies and New Items in LL, in “Linguistic Landscape” 1 [1/2], pp. 6-18.

Blackwood R.J. 2015, LL Explorations and Methodological Challenges. Analysis of France’s Regional Languages, in “Linguistic Landscape” 1 [1/2], pp. 38-53.

Blommaert J. 2010, The Sociolinguistics of Globalization, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Blommaert J. 2012, Chronicles of Complexity. Ethnography, Superdiversity, and Linguistic Landscapes, en “Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies” s.n., s.p.

Blommaert J. 2013, Semiotic and Spatial Scope Towards a Materialist Semiotics, en Pachler N. and Böck M. (eds.), Multimodality and Social Semiosis. Communciation, Meaning-Making, and Learning in the Work of Gunther Kress, The Routledge, London/New York, pp. 29-38.

Bourdieu P. 1991, Language and Symbolic Power, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Butler J. 1997, Excitable Speech, The Routledge, London/New York.

Calvi M.V., Mapelli G. e Bonomi M. (eds.) 2010, Lingua, identità e immigrazione, FrancoAngeli, Milano, pp. 221-235.

Carbaugh D. and Van Over B. 2013, Interpersonal Pragmatics and Cultural Discourse, in “Journal of Pragmatics” 58, pp. 142-145.

Castillo Lluch M. y Sáez Rivera D.M. 2013, Introducción, en “RILI” 11, pp. 9-22.

Collins J., Slembrouck S. and Baynham M. (eds.) 2009, Globalisation and Language in Contact: Scale, Migration, and Communicative Practices, Continuum, London/New York.

Coupland N. and Garrett P. 2010, Linguistic Landscapes, Discursive Frameworks and Metacultural Performance: The Case of Welsh Patagonia, in “International Journal of the Sociology of Language” 205, pp. 7-36.

Díaz Cardona R. 2016, Ambient text and the becoming space of writing, in “Environment and Planning D: Society and Space” 34 [4], pp. 637-654.

Duranti A. 2007, Etnopragmatica. La forza del parlare, Carocci Editore, Roma.

Eco U. 1978, Trattato di semiotica generale, Bompiani, Milano.

Eelen G. 2001, A Critique of Politeness Theories, St. Jerome Publishing, Manchester.

Escandell Vidal M.V. 1996, Introducción a la pragmática, Ariel, Barcelona.

Franco Rodríguez J.M. 2009, Interpreting the Linguistic Traits of Linguistic Landscapes as Ethnolinguistic Vitality: Methodological Approach, en “Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada” 8, pp. 1-15.

García O. 2009, Education, Multilingualism and Translanguaging in the 21st Century, in Mohanty A., Panda M., Phillipson R. and Skutnabb-Kangas T. (eds.), Multilingual Education for Social Justice: Globalising the Local, Orient Blackswan, New Delhi, pp. 140-158.

Goffman E. 1959, The Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life, Doubleday, Garden City.

Gorter D. 2006a, Introduction: The Study of the Linguistic Landscape as a New Approach to Multilingualism, in “International Journal of Multilingualism” 3 [1], pp. 1-6.

Gorter D. 2006b, Further Possibilities for Linguistic Landscape Research, in Gorter D. (ed.), Linguistic Landscape. A New Approach to Multilingualism, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, pp. 81-89.

Gorter D. 2013, Linguistic Landscapes in a Multilingual World, in “Annual Review of Applied Linguistics” 33, pp. 190-212.

Gorter D. and Cenoz J. 2007, Knowledge about Language and Linguistic Landscape, in Hornberger N. H. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Springer Science, Berlin, pp. 1-13.

Gorter D. and Cenoz J. 2017, Linguistic Landscape and Multilingualism, in Gorter D., Cenoz J. and May S. (eds.), Language Awareness and Multilingualism, Springer, Switzerland.

Haugh M. 2007, The Discoursive Challenge to Politeness Research: An Interactional Alternative, in “Journal of Politeness Research” 3, pp. 295-317.

Hernández-Campoy J.M. y Almeida M. 2005, Metodología de la investigación sociolingüística, Comares, Málaga.

Highmore B. 2002, Introduction: Questioning Everyday Life, in Highmore B. (ed.), The everyday Life Reader, Routledge, London/New York, pp. 1-34.

Huebner T. 2009, A Framework for the Linguistic Analysis of Linguistic Landscapes, en Shohamy E. and Gorter D. (eds.), Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery, Routledge, London/New York, pp. 70-87.

Huebner T. 2016, Linguistic Landscape: History, Trajectory and Pedagogy, in “Manusya” 22, pp. 1-11.

Hymes D. 1972, Models of Interaction of Language and Social Life, in Gumperz J.J. and Hymes D. (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 35-71.

Kasper G. 2000, Data Collection in Pragmatics Research, in Spencer-Oatey H., Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk Across Cultures, Continuum, London/New York, pp. 316-341.

Knapp M., Miller G. and Fudge K. 1994, Background and Current Trends in the Study of Interpersonal Communication, in Knapp M. and Miller G.R. (eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp. 3-24.

Lavandera B. 1984, Los límites de la variable sociolingüística, en Lavandera B. (ed.) Variación y significado, Hachette, Buenos Aires, pp. 37-46.

Locher M.A. 2013, Relational Work and Interpersonal Pragmatics, in “Journal of Pragmatics” 58, pp. 145-149.

Locher M.A. and Graham S.L. (eds.) 2010, Interpersonal Pragmatics. The Handbooks of Pragmatics Volume 6, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Malinowsky D. 2009, Authorship in the Linguistic Landscape: A Multimodal-Performative View, in Shohamy E. and Gorter D. (eds.), Lingusitic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery, Routledge, London/New York, pp. 107-125.

Mills S. 2011, Discursive Approaches to Politeness and Impoliteness, in Linguistic Politeness Research Group (eds.), Discursive Approaches to Politeness, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 19-56.

Nash J. 2016, Is Linguistic Landscape Necessary?, in “Landscape Research” 41 [3], pp. 380-384.

Pennycook A. 2010, Language as a Local Practice, Routledge, Abingdon.

Pons Rodríguez L. 2012, El paisaje lingüístico de Sevilla. Lenguas y variedades en el escenario urbano hispalense, Diputación de Sevilla, Sevilla.

Prego Vázquez G. y Zas Varela L. 2015, Identidades en los márgenes de la superdiversidad: prácticas comunicativas y escalas sociolingüísticas en los nuevos espacios educativos multilingües en Galicia, en “Discurso & Sociedad”, 9 [1/2], pp. 165-196.

Salzmann T. 2014, Language, Identity and Urban Space. The language Use of Latin American Migrants, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.

Scollon R. and Scollon Wong S. 2003, Discourses in Place, Routledge, London/New York.

Sebba M. 2010, Discourses in Transit, in Jaworski A. and Thurlow C. (eds.), Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space, Continuum, London, pp. 59-76.

Soler-Carbonell J. 2016, Complexity Perspectives on Linguistic Landscapes: A Scalar Analysis, en “Linguistic Landscapes” 2 [1], pp. 1-25.

Spencer-Oatey H. 2000, Rapport Management: A Framework for Analysis, in Spencer-Oatey H. (ed.), Culturally Speaking. Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures, Continuum, London, pp. 11-46

Spolsky B. and Cooper R.L. 1991, The Languages of Jerusalem, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Uberti Bona M. 2016, Esempi di eteroglossia nel paesaggio linguistico milanese, in “Lingue Culture mediazioni/Languages Cultures Mediation” 3 [1], pp. 151-166.

Vedovelli M. (ed.) 2013, La migrazione globale delle lingue: Lingue in (super-)contatto nei contesti migratori del mondo globale, in “Studi Emigrazione”, 191.

Vertovec S. 2007, Super-diversity and its Implications, in “Ethnic and Racial Studies” 30 [6], pp. 1024-1054.

Zimmermann K. y Morgenthaler García L. (eds.) 2007, Introducción: ¿Lingüística y migración o lingüística de la migración?: De la construcción de un objeto científico hacia una nueva disciplina, en “Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana RILI”, 2 [10], pp. 7-19.


Full Text: pdf

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.