Is Abortion Dividing Society? Differentiated Attitudes and Contextual Factors. A Quantitative Vignette Study


Abstract


We investigated in our quantitative study, based on a factorial survey, whether and how people change their skeptical attitude towards abortions when they are given a vignette and, thus, confronted with further information about the life situation of a person who has an unplanned pregnancy. Our target group was men over 41 years of age living in Western Germany, as this population group is the most critical of abortions, according to the ALLBUS, the German General Social Survey. A computer-assisted telephonic interview survey was conducted with 302 people from the target group. After general questions, such as whether abortion should remain a criminal offense under § 218 of the German Criminal Code and only be exempt from punishment under certain conditions, the participants were randomly assigned to three thematic vignettes: financial burden, eugenics or intimate partner violence. Our results show that, even in the target group, only 24.9% of respondents agree that abortion should remain criminalized. In the face of new information, comprehensibility of the decision to have an abortion increased in all three vignettes.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20398573v11n1p195

Keywords: abortion; change in attitude; vignette survey; quantitative study; ALLBUS

References


Adewuyi, T. D. (2012). Theories of attitudes. In C. D. Logan & M. I. Hodges (Eds.), Psychology of Attitudes (pp. 62-78). Nova Science Publishers.

Allport, G. W. (1979). The Nature of Prejudice. 25th Anniversary Edition. Basic Books (Perseus Books Group).

Atzmüller, C., & Steiner, P. M. (2010). Experimental vignette studies in survey research. Methodology, 6(3), 128-138. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000014

Auspurg, K., Hinz, T., and Liebig, S. (2009). Komplexität von Vignetten, Lerneffekte und Plausibilität im Faktoriellen Survey. Methoden, Daten, Analysen, 3(1), 59-96. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-126659

Banaszak, L. A. (1998). East-west differences in German abortion opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 545-582.

Bortz, J., & Schuster, C. (2010). Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler (7th ed.). Springer Medizin Verlag.

Bueno, X., Asamoah, N. A., LaRoche, K. J., Dennis, B., Crawford, B. L., Turner, R. C., Lo, W.-J., and Jozkowski, K. N. (2023). People’s perception of changes in their abortion attitudes over the life course. A mixed methods approach. Advances in Life Course Research, 57, 100558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2023.100558

Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (BMFSFJ) (2024). Kommission zur reproduktiven Selbstbestimmung und Fortpflanzungsmedizin legt Abschlussbericht vor, last accessed 20 November 2024, https://www.bmfsfj.de/bmfsfj/aktuelles/presse/pressemitteilungen/kommissionzur-reproduktiven-selbstbestimmung-und-fortpflanzungsmedizin-legtabschlussbericht-vor-238414

Busch, U. (2022). Schwangerschaftsabbruch in Deutschland. Zwischen sexuellen und reproduktiven Rechten und strafrechtlicher Verankerung. In Jahrbuch für Kritische Medizin und Gesellschaftswissenschaften 53. Sexualität und Reproduktion zwischen individuellen Vorstellungen und gesellschaftlichen Normen (pp. 86-111). Argument Verlag.

CDU, CSU, and SPD. (2025). Verantwortung für Deutschland. Koalitionsvertrag zwischen CDU,

CSU und SPD. 21. Legislaturperiode, last accessed 03 June 2025, https://www.koalitionsvertrag2025.de/sites/www.koalitionsvertrag2025.de/files/ko

av_2025.pdf

Cheng, J., Xu, P., and Thostenson, C. (2024). Psychological traits and public attitudes towards abortion: The role of empathy, locus of control, and need for cognition. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02487-z

Clarke, E. V., Sibley, C. G., and Osborne, D. (2023). Examining changes in abortion attitudes

following the transition to parenthood. Sex Roles, 89(9-10), 505-516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01408-3

Craig, S. C., Kane, J. G., and Martinez, M. D. (2002). Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes

you don’t: Citizens’ ambivalence about abortion. Political Psychology, 23(2), 285-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00282

Deutschlandfunk.de (2024). Paragraf 218 – Regierung will „Spaltung der Gesellschaft“ über Abtreibung vermeiden. Die Nachrichten, last accessed 20 November 2024, https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/regierung-will-spaltung-der-gesellschaft-ueberabtreibung-vermeiden-100.html

Ehl, D. (2024). What next for Germany after government collapse? A timeline, last accessed 03 March 2025, https://www.dw.com/en/what-next-for-germany-after-governmentcollapse-a-timeline/a-70729309

ELSA Study. (2024). Fact Sheet. Ausgewählte Ergebnisse aus dem ELSA-Forschungsprojekt. http://docs.dpaq.de/19810-fact_sheets_gesamt_april_2024.pdf

Ertan, S., and Yaman, S. (2025). Abortion Laws in Democracies: Revisiting the Political Development Aspect of Modernization. Interdisciplinary Political Studies 11(1), 11-30. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20398573v11n1p11

GESIS-Leibniz-Institut Für Sozialwissenschaften. (2021). ALLBUS/GGSS 1980-2018 (Kumulierte

Allgemeine Bevölkerungsumfrage der Sozialwissenschaften/Cumulated German General Social Survey 1980-2018) Allgemeine Bevölkerungsumfrage der Sozialwissenschaften ALLBUS – Kumulation 1980–2018 (1.1.0) [dataset]. GESIS Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13748

GESIS-Leibniz-Institut Für Sozialwissenschaften. (2023). ALLBUS/GGSS 2021 (Allgemeine Bevölkerungsumfrage der Sozialwissenschaften/German General Social Survey 2021) Allgemeine Bevölkerungsumfrage der Sozialwissenschaften ALLBUS 2021 (Version 2.0.1) [Dataset]. GESIS. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14238

GESIS-Leibniz-Institut Für Sozialwissenschaften. (n. d.) ALLBUS, last accessed 22 November 2024, https://www.gesis.org/en/allbus

Jozkowski, K. N., Crawford, B. L., and Hunt, M. E. (2018). Complexity in attitudes toward abortion access: Results from two studies. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 15(4), 464-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0322-4

Jung, A., Korn, A., Winter, K., and Brzank, P. J. (2023). Vulnerabilitäten und Handlungsmacht von ungewollt Schwangeren mit Partnergewalterfahrungen: die Komplexität der Gleichzeitigkeit. Psychologie & Gesellschaftskritik 47(188), 357-382. https://doi.org/10.2440/007-0009

Kim, T., & Steinberg, J. R. (2023). Individual changes in abortion knowledge and attitudes. Social Science & Medicine 320, 115722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115722

Kinkartz, S. (2025). What lies ahead for the new German government?, last accessed 03 June

, https://www.dw.com/en/what-lies-ahead-for-the-new-germangovernment/a-72464496

Kommission zur reproduktiven Selbstbestimmung und Fortpflanzungsmedizin. (2024). Bericht der Kommission zur reproduktiven Selbstbestimmung und Fortpflanzungsmedizin, last accessed 20 November 2024, https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/fileadmin/Dateien/3_Downloads/K/Kom-rSF/Abschlussbericht_Kom-rSF.pdf

Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal

of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583-621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441

Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177730491

Osborne, D., Huang, Y., Overall, N. C., Sutton, R. M., Petterson, A., Douglas, K. M., Davies, P. G., & Sibley, C. G. (2022). Abortion attitudes: An overview of demographic and ideological differences. Political Psychology, 43(S1), 29-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12803

Phoenix vor ort. (2024). Übergabe Bericht zur reproduktiven Selbstbestimmung, last accessed 20 November 2024, https://www.ardmediathek.de/video/phoenix-vorort/uebergabe-bericht-zur-reproduktivenselbstbestimmung/phoenix/Y3JpZDovL3Bob2VuaXguZGUvNDQwNzE3Mg

Pullan, D. &Trail, M. (2025). Evaluating the intersection of attitudes on foster care and abortion among US American evangelicals. Interdisciplinary Political Studies 11(1), 171-194. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20398573v11n1p171

Task Force FGZ-Datenzentrum. (2022). Gefährdeter Zusammenhalt? Polarisierungs- und Spaltungstendenzen in Deutschland. Ausgewählte Ergebnisse der FGZ-Pilotstude 2020. Universität Bremen. https://doi.org/10.26092/ELIB/1739

Watson, K. (2018). Why we should stop using the term “elective abortion”. AMA Journal of Ethics, 20(12), E1175-1180. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2018.1175

Zeier, K. & Grün, G.-C. (2025). German election results explained in graphics, last accessed 03

March 2025, https://www.dw.com/en/german-election-results-explained-ingraphics/a-71724186


Full Text: pdf

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4 ویزای استارتاپ

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.