Political Economy of the Eurasian Integration


The Eurasian Economic Union, launched in 2015, is often seen with suspicion for ostensible domination by the Kremlin over those former Soviet republics that seek various benefits from reestablishing close links with Russia. Yet the very idea of intergovernmental integration implies that Russian influence can no longer be applied directly but has to be channeled through supranational institutions. In the context of globalization the Eurasian project can also be seen as an attempt to boost economic competitiveness of its members by reorienting the region from inherently unstable resource-based models into more sustainable ones, based on vibrant domestic industries. In practice, however, the EAEU has not yet demonstrated much economically, especially as far as mutual trade and investment are concerned, and after the recent resignation of the Kazakhstan’s president Nursultan Nazarbaev as one of its earliest and most influential enthusiasts, there may also be political challenges to the very survival of the project.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20398573v5n2p405

Keywords: EAEU; Postsocialism; Regional economic integration


Abalkin, A & Whalley, J 1999, ‘The problem of capital flight from Russia’ World Economy, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 421–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9701.00209

Aslund, A 2012, How Capitalism Was Built: The Transformation of Central and Eastern Europe, Russia, and Central Asia, 2nd ed, Cambridge University Press; Cam-bridge.

Balakishi, S 2016, Eurasian Economic Union: Russia’s New Foreign Policy in the South Caucasus, Working Paper, Maastricht School of Management, viewed 5 April 2019, ˂http://web2.msm.nl/RePEc/msm/wpaper/MSM-WP2016-1.pdf˃.

Balassa, B 1974, ‘Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in the European Common Market: an Appraisal of the Evidence’, The Manchester School, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 93–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1974.tb00105.x

Baldwin, R 2011, 21st century Regionalism: Filling the Gap Between 21st Century Trade and 20th Century Trade Rules, Staff Working Paper ERSD-2011-08, World Trade Organization, Geneva, viewed 30 October 2018, .

Balmaceda, M 2013, The Politics of Energy Dependency: Ukraine, Belarus and Lithuania Between Domestic Oligarchs and Russian Pressure, University of Toronto Press; Toronto.

Balmaceda, M 2017, Chains of Value – Chains of Power, guest lecture, 19 June, Leibniz Institute for Regional Geography, Leipzig, viewed 5 April 2019, ˂https://www.ifl-leipzig.de/en/news/events/detail/article/chains-of-value-chains-of-power-project-an-introduction.html˃.

British Petroleum (BP) 2018, BP Statistical Review of World Energy, 67th edition, June, viewed 6 April, ˂https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2018-full-report.pdf˃.

Busvine, D 2007, ‘New VW Plant Symbolises Russia’s FDI Boom’, Reuters, 28 November, viewed 31 January 2019, ˂https://www.reuters.com/article/russia-vote-volkswagen/new-vw-plant-symbolises-russias-fdi-boom-idUSBUS84732220071128˃.

Carroll, O 2018, ‘Step up Vladimir Putin, president of Belarus?’ The Independent, 20 December, viewed 23 December, ˂https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russia-belarus-putin-lukashenko-sovereignty-rule-oil-tax-crimea-term-presidency-a8689416.html˃.

Central Bank of Russia (CBR) 2018, ‘Platezhnyi balans, mezhdunarodnaya investitsionnaya pozitsiya i vneshniy dolg Rossiiskoi Federatsii – yanvar-iyun 2018 goda [Balance of payments, international investment position and external debt of the Russian Federation – January-June 2018], Vestnik Banka Rossii [Bank of Russia Bulletin], no. 93–94, viewed 3 April 2019, ˂https://www.cbr.ru/Queries/XsltBlock/File/48359?fileId=-1&scope=2047-2048˃.

Delcour, L & Kostanyan, H 2014, Towards a Fragmented Neighborhood: Policies of the EU and Russia and their Consequences for the Area that Lies in between, CEPS Essay, 17 October, Center for European Policy Studies, Brussels, viewed 30 October 2019, ˂https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/CEPS%20Essay%20No%2017%20Fragmented%20Neighbourhood%20-%20H%20Kostanyan%20L%20Delcour.pdf˃.

Dobrinsky, R (ed) 2016, The Belarus Economy: The Challenges of Stalled Reforms, The Vienna Institute of International Economic Relations, Research Report no. 413, November, viewed 6 April 2019, ˂https://wiiw.ac.at/the-belarus-economy-the-challenges-of-stalled-reforms-dlp-4032.pdf˃.

Dragneva, R & Wolczuk, K 2013, Eurasian Economic Integration: Law, Policy and Politics, Edward Elgar; Cheltenham.

Economist 2011, ‘Too strong for comfort: how to live with an overvalued curren-cy?’ 3 September, p. 76.

Ellman, M 2000, ‘The Social Costs and Consequences of the Transformation Pro-cess’, Economic Survey of Europe, no. 2/3, pp.125–140, viewed 30 October 2019, https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/ead/pub/002/002_5.pdf

Eurasian Development Bank (EDB) 2017, Monitoring vzaimnykh investitsiy v stranakh SNG 2017 [Monitoring mutual investments in CIS 2017], Center of Integration Studies, 10 October, viewed 5 April 2019, .

Eurasian Economic Commission (EEC) 2017, Programma formirovaniya obshchikh rynkov nefti i nefteproduktov Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza [Program of creating common markets for oil and oil products in the Eurasian Economic Union], 20 December, viewed 6 April 2019, .

Eurasian Economic Commission (EEC) 2018, Metodologia vedeniya statistiki vzaimnoi torgovli tovarami gosudarstv-chlenov Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza’ [Methodology of running statistics of mutual merchandise trade by member-states of the Eurasian Economic Union], 25 December, viewed 4 February 2019, .

Eurasian Economic Commission (EEC) 2019a, Rabota po vyavleniyu i ustraneniyu prepyatstviy [Activities targeting and removing barriers], viewed 8 October 2019, .

Eurasian Economic Commission (EEC) 2019b, Statisticheskie tablitsy [Statistical tables], viewed 22 February 2019, .

European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) 2012, Transition Re-port 2012: Integration across borders, EBRD; London.

European Commission (EC) 2018, Celebrating the Customs Union: the world’s largest trading bloc turns 50, Press release, 30 June, viewed 1 February 2019, .

European Communities (ECs) 2003, External and Intra-European Union Trade – Statistical Yearbook, Theme 6 External trade, Office of the Official Publications of the European Communities; Luxembourg.

Eurostat 2019, EU Open Data Portal, updated 25 October, viewed 22 February 2019, ˂https://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/FXQMUw9I5qJ3eqHLwdeoA˃.

International Labor Organization (ILO) 2019, ILOSTAT, viewed 5 April, ˂https://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/wcnav_defaultSelection;ILOSTATCOOKIE=aeHtDK8ib_MAQUhIAtL_H8GdgvW-OvOwv9eFLmuAIn-GLUr4WM2q!1567639201?_afrLoop=1558358848538415&_afrWindowMode=0&_afrWindowId=47260#!%40%40%3F_afrWindowId%3D47260%26_afrLoop%3D1558358848538415%26_afrWindowMode%3D0%26_adf.ctrl-state%3Demzy5rzlj_4˃.

International Monetary Fund (IMF) 2012, Republic of Belarus: 2012 Article IV Consultation and Second Post-Program Monitoring Discussions – Staff Report; Informational Annex; and Public Information Notice on the Executive Board Discussion, Country Report no. 12/113, May, viewed 6 April 2019, ˂https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2012/cr12113.pdf˃.

International Monetary Fund (IMF) 2013, German-Central European Supply Chain: Cluster Report, Multi-Country Report no. 13/263, 20 August, viewed 5 April 2019, ˂https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2016/12/31/German-Central-European-Supply-Chain-Cluster-Report-Staff-Report-First-Background-Note-40881˃.

Ioffe, G 2019, ‘Belarus’s Sovereignty and Russia’s Brotherly Embrace’, Eurasia Daily Monitor, 14 January, viewed 17 January, ˂https://jamestown.org/program/belaruss-sovereignty-and-russias-brotherly-embrace/?fbclid=IwAR0tLUKQ5guug6ATTDIAwGO_J 13YuPgC5qt8oT3Gkk8i2rORXgINc0VHdqU˃.

Lane, D & Samokhvalov, V 2015, The Eurasian Project and Europe: Regional Discontinuities and Geopolitics, Palgrave Macmillan; Basingstoke.

Laursen, F 2010, Comparative Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond, Ashgate; Farn-ham.

Ledyaeva, S, Karhunen, P & Whalley, J 2013, If Foreign Investment is Not Foreign: Round-Trip versus Genuine Foreign Investment in Russia, CEPII Working Paper, Center for Prospective Studies and International Information [Le Centre D’études Prospectives et D’informations Internationales], viewed 26 March 2019, ˂http://cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2013/wp2013-05.pdf˃.

Libman, A 2017, ‘Russian Power Politics and the Eurasian Economic Union: The Real and the Imagined’, Rising Powers Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 81–103.

Mattli, W 1999, The Logic of Regional Integration, Cambridge University Press; Cam-bridge.

McKay, J, Armengol, M & Pineau, G (eds) 2005, Regional Economic Integration in a Global Framework, European Central Bank; Frankfurt am Main.

Michalopoulos, C & Tarr, D 1997, The economics of customs unions in the Commonwealth of Independent States, Policy Research Working Paper 1786, World Bank, Washington, DC.

Offe, C 1991, ‘Capitalism by Democratic Design? Facing the Triple Transition in East Central Europe’, Social Research, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 865–992.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 1963, OECD Economic Surveys: Germany, January, viewed 9 April 2019, ˂https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/oecd-economic-surveys-germany-1963_eco_surveys-deu-1963-en˃.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 1969a, OECD Economic Surveys: France, January, viewed 9 April 2019, ˂https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/oecd-economic-surveys-france-1969_eco_surveys-fra-1969-en˃.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 1969b, OECD Economic Surveys: Germany, January, viewed 9 April 2019, ˂https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/oecd-economic-surveys-germany-1969_eco_surveys-deu-1969-en˃.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 1969c, OECD Economic Surveys: Netherlands, January, viewed 9 April 2019, ˂https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/oecd-economic-surveys-netherlands-1969_eco_surveys-nld-1969-en˃.

Pivovar, E 2015, ‘Khristenko: sushchestvennaya chast soderzhaniya dialoga mezhdu ES i stranami EAES peredana v nadnatsionalnuyu kompetentsiyu [Khristenko: a substantial part of the dialogue contents between the EU and EAEU countries given supranational competence]’, 18 June, viewed 22 June 2015, ˂http://www.belta.by/ru/all_news/politics/Hristenko-suschestvennaja-chast-soderzhanija-dialoga-mezhdu-ES-i-stranami-EAES-peredana-v-nadnatsionalnuju-kompetentsiju_i_709326˃.

Preiherman, Y 2019, ‘Belarus and Russia Dispute the Fundamentals of Their Rela-tionship’, Eurasia Daily Monitor, 15 January, viewed 17 January, ˂https://jamestown.org/program/belarus-and-russia-dispute-the-fundamentals-of-their-relationship/?fbclid=IwAR01ybIuoU-NVMhxkKREtV9sRCkgs2vzJHkyssrORdgYTGeT0-AsPWIrWI˃.

Soldatkin, V & Makhovsky, A 2016, ‘Russia Reminds Wayward Ally Belarus of Its Economic Muscle’, Reuters, 7 July, viewed 6 August 2019, ˂https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-belarus/russia-reminds-wayward-ally-belarus-of-its-economic-muscle-idUSKCN0ZN0E3˃.

Union State 2019, Union State documents, Information Analysis Portal, viewed 6 April, ˂http://eng.soyuz.by/about/docs/˃.

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) 2017, State of Commodity Dependence 2016, United Nations; New York and Geneva.

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) 2019, UNCTAD-STAT Data Center, viewed 5 April 2019, ˂https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx?sCS_ChosenLang=en˃.

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) 1948, Economic Report: Salient Features of the World Economic Situation 1945-47, New York, viewed 8 April 2019, .

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) 1960, World Economic Survey 1959, viewed 8 April 2019, .

United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) 2019, UNIDO Statistics Data Portal, viewed 5 April 2019, .

United Nations Statistics Division (UNSTAT) 2008, Standard International Trade Classification, Revision 4, 13 August, viewed 5 April 2019, ˂https://unstats.un.org/unsd/trade/sitcrev4.htm˃.

Viner, J 1950, The Customs Union Issue, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace; New York.

Vinokurov, E 2018, Introduction to the Eurasian Economic Union, Palgrave Macmillan; Basingstoke.

Welfens, PJ & Kauffmann, A 2005, ‘Structural Change, Natural Resources Sector Expansion and Growth in Russia’, in E Graham, N Oding & PJ Welfens (eds), Internationalization and Economic Policy Reforms in Transition Countries, Springer, pp. 5–45.

World Bank 2019, DataBank/World Development Indicators, viewed 5 April 2019, ˂https://databank.worldbank.org/data/source/world-development-indicators/preview/on˃.

Yarashevich, V 2013, ‘External Debt of Postcommunist Countries’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 203–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2013.03.001

Zemskova, K 2018, The Common Energy Market of the Eurasian Economic Union: Implications for the European Union and the role of the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), Occasional Paper Series of the Energy Charter Secretariat, viewed 6 April, ˂https://energycharter.org/fileadmin/DocumentsMedia/Occasional/1The_common_energy_market_of_the_EAEU-implications_for_the__EU_and_the_role_of_the_ECT.pdf˃

Full Text: pdf


  • There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.