On becoming motivated Europeans: a study on European Young Adults’ intention to vote in general elections


Abstract


This study examines the voting intentions of young adults across five European countries—Italy, Spain, Germany, France, and the United Kingdom—using Self-Determination Theory (SDT) as a foundational framework to understand motivation and participation in the political sphere. Given the context of widespread institutional distrust and sociopolitical shifts in Europe, this research integrates SDT constructs—such as needs satisfaction, motivation, and amotivation—alongside participative efficacy and politicized identification. The Politicized Identification Model of Intention to Vote (PIMIV) was tested, hypothesizing that the fulfillment of psychological needs would enhance intrinsic motivation, which would, in turn, indirectly influence voting intentions through politicized identification. Results indicate that the satisfaction of autonomy, competence, and relatedness fosters intrinsic motivation, positively impacting voting intentions through the mediating role of politicized identification. Conversely, amotivation negatively affects both voting intentions and identification with the group of voters. The study’s findings, which were consistent across all analyzed countries, highlight the importance of both individual and group factors in shaping political engagement. This research provides insight into the mechanisms driving electoral participation and underscores the role of social identification in fostering civic engagement, offering practical implications for enhancing political motivation among young Europeans. Thus, this study opens new avenues for future research into the psychological underpinnings of democratic participation.


DOI Code: 10.1285/i24212113v11i1p25

Keywords: intention to vote, politicized identification, Self-Determination Theory, political participation, Europeans

References


Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Alberici, A. I., & Milesi, P. (2016). Online discussion, politicized identity, and collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(1), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215581430

Alberici, A. I., & Milesi, P. (2018). Online Discussion and the Moral Pathway to Identity Politicization and Collective Action. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 143-158. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i1.1507

Bamberg, S., Rees, J., & Seebauer, S. (2015). Collective climate action: Determinants of participation intention in community-based pro-environmental initiatives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 155-165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.006

Barkas, D., & Chryssochoou, X. (2017). Becoming politicized: Political socialization and participation of young people in the December 2008 revolt in Greece. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225(4), 324-335. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000311

Barrett, M. (2015). An integrative model of political and civic participation: Linking the macro, social and psychological levels of explanation. In Political and civic engagement: Multidisciplinary perspectives. (pp. 162-187). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Beckman, L. (2009). The frontiers of democracy: the right to vote and its limits. Springer.

Chiu, T. K. F. (2022). Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(sup1), S14-S30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998

Costa, S., Ingoglia, S., Inguglia, C., Liga, F., Lo Coco, A., & Larcan, R. (2018). Psychometric Evaluation of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (BPNSFS) in Italy. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 51(3), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1347021

Dadvand, B., & McLeod, J. (2021). Youth, Education and the Ethos of Vulnerability in Uncertain Times. Journal of Applied Youth Studies, 4(4), 307-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43151-021-00058-0

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.

Deci, E. L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2004). Self-determination theory and basic need satisfaction: Understanding human development in positive psychology. Ricerche di Psicologia, 27(1), 23-40.

Ellena, A. M., Marta, E., Simões, F., Fernandes-Jesus, M., & Petrescu, C. (2021). Soft skills and psychological well-being: A study on Italian rural and urban NEETs. Calitatea Vieții, 32(4), 352-370.

Ellena, A. M., Marzana, D., Marta, E., Rosina, A., & Simões, F. (2023). NEETs-One Social Group, Many Profiles: a Proposed Descriptive Profiling of Psychosocial Dimensions. Rivista internazionale di scienze sociali: 3, 2023, 353-384

Ellena, A. M., Ferreira, T., Soler-Porta, M., Simões, F., & Pozzi, M. (2024). Unveiling the Social Representation of European Identity Among Young Adults in Italy, Portugal, and Spain: An Exploratory Study. Community Psychology in Global Perspective, 10(2), 124-147.

Fattori, F., Pozzi, M., Marzana, D., & Mannarini, T. (2015). A proposal for an integrated model of prosocial behavior and collective action as the expression of global citizenship. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(7), 907-917. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2154

Flannery, M. (2017). Self-determination theory: Intrinsic motivation and behavioral change. Number 2/March 2017, 44(2), 155-156.

Flynn, B. S., Dana, G. S., Goldstein, A. O., Bauman, K. E., Cohen, J. E., Gottlieb, N. H., Solomon, L. J., & Munger, M. C. (1997). State legislators' intentions to vote and subsequent votes on tobacco control legislation. Health Psychology, 16(4), 401-404. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.16.4.401

Fortier, M. S., Duda, J. L., Guerin, E., & Teixeira, P. J. (2012). Promoting physical activity: development and testing of self-determination theory-based interventions. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-20

Glasford, D. E. (2008). Predicting Voting Behavior of Young Adults: The Importance of Information, Motivation, and Behavioral Skills. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(11), 2648-2672. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00408.x

Gollwitzer, P. M., & Bargh, J. A. (1996). The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior. Guilford Press.

Grasso, M., & Giugni, M. (2022). Intra-generational inequalities in young people’s political participation in Europe: The impact of social class on youth political engagement. Politics, 42(1), 13-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957211031742

Grolnick, W. S., Levitt, M., & Caruso, A. (2017). Adolescent autonomy in context: Facilitative parenting in different cultures, domains, and settings. In Autonomy in adolescent development (pp. 94-118). Psychology Press.

Hansen, T., & Jensen, J. M. (2007). Understanding voters’ decisions: A theory of planned behavior approach. Innovative Marketing, 3(4), 87-94.

Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

King, R., & Ruiz‐Gelices, E. (2003). International student migration and the European ‘year abroad’: Effects on European identity and subsequent migration behaviour. International Journal of Population Geography, 9(3), 229-252. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijpg.280

Klandermans, B. (2002). How group identification helps to overcome the dilemma of collective action. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(5), 887-900.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 3rd ed. Guilford Press.

Koestner, R., Losier, G. F., Vallerand, R. J., & Carducci, D. (1996). Identified and introjected forms of political internalization: Extending self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 1025-1036. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.1025

Koivula, A., Malinen, S., & Saarinen, A. (2021). The voice of distrust? The relationship between political trust, online political participation and voting. Journal of Trust Research, 11(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2022.2026781

Levesque, C., Zuehlke, A. N., Stanek, L. R., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Autonomy and Competence in German and American University Students: A Comparative Study Based on Self-Determination Theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.68

Levy, B. L. M., & Akiva, T. (2019). Motivating Political Participation Among Youth: An Analysis of Factors Related to Adolescents’ Political Engagement. Political Psychology, 40(5), 1039-1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12578

Lieberman, E., & Zhou, Y.-Y. (2022). Self-Efficacy and Citizen Engagement in Development: Experimental Evidence from Tanzania. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 9(1), 46-63. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2020.47

Lilleker, D. G., & Koc-Michalska, K. (2017). What Drives Political Participation? Motivations and Mobilization in a Digital Age. Political Communication, 34(1), 21-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1225235

Macdougall, A. I., Feddes, A. R., & Doosje, B. (2020). “They've Put Nothing in the Pot!”: Brexit and the Key Psychological Motivations Behind Voting 'Remain' and 'Leave'. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12660

Macedo, S. (2006). Democracy at risk: How political choices undermine citizen participation, and what we can do about it. Rowman & Littlefield

MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate behavioral research, 39(1), 99-128.

Mazzoni, D., van Zomeren, M., & Cicognani, E. (2015). The Motivating Role of Perceived Right Violation and Efficacy Beliefs in Identification with the Italian Water Movement. Political Psychology, 36(3), 315-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12101

Mohan, J. (2024). Volunteering and civic engagement. Volunteering in the United Kingdom, 176-192.

Moshagen, M., & Erdfelder, E. (2016). A new strategy for testing structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(1), 54-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.950896

Müller, F. H., & Palekčić, M. (2005). Continuity of motivation in higher education: A three-year follow-up study. Annual Review of Psychology, 12, 31-43.

Muro, D., & Vidal, G. (2017). Political mistrust in southern Europe since the Great Recession. Mediterranean Politics, 22(2), 197-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2016.1168962

Norris, P. & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge University Press.

Otjes, S., Stroebe, K., & Postmes, T. (2020). When Voting Becomes Protest: Mapping Determinants of Collective Action Onto Voting Behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 513-521. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619872482

Panagopoulos, C. (2008). The Calculus of Voting in Compulsory Voting Systems. Political Behavior, 30(4), 455-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9058-9

Pastore, M. (2012). Modelli di equazioni strutturali per variabili osservate: una nota sugli indici di adattamento. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 39, 453-477.

Pistoni, C., Ellena, A. M., Aresi, G., Marta, E., & Pozzi, M. (2023). Self-Determined Intention to Vote and the Mediating Role of Politicized Identification. Social Psychology, 54(4), 225-236.

Pozzi, M., Passini, S., Chayinska, M., Morselli, D., Ellena, A. M., Włodarczyk, A., & Pistoni, C. (2022). ‘Coming together to awaken our democracy’: Examining precursors of emergent social identity and collective action among activists and non-activists in the 2019–2020 ‘Chile despertó’ protests. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2598

Pozzi, M., Pistoni, C., & Alfieri, S. (2017). Verso una psicologia della partecipazione. Una sistematizzazione teorica dei rapporti tra le azioni nel sociale [Toward a Psychology of Participation: A theoretical analysis of the relationship between actions in the social context]. Psicologia Sociale, 3, 253-276. https://doi.org/10.1482/87884

Qvortrup, M. (2020). Government by referendum. In Government by referendum. Manchester University Press.

Rekker, R. (2022). Young trendsetters: How young voters fuel electoral volatility. Electoral Studies, 75, 102425. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102425

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Schmitt, M. T., Mackay, C. M. L., Droogendyk, L. M., & Payne, D. (2019). What predicts environmental activism? The roles of identification with nature and politicized environmental identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 61, 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.11.003

Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319-331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319

Stavrou, N. A. (2008). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation and amotivation: Examining self-determination theory from flow theory perspective. In New developments in the psychology of motivation. (pp. 1-24). Nova Science Publishers.

Stefani, S., Prati, G., Tzankova, I., Ricci, E., Albanesi, C., & Cicognani, E. (2021). Gender Differences in Civic and Political Engagement and Participation Among Italian Young People. Social Psychological Bulletin, 16(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.3887

Talò, C., Mannarini, T., & Rochira, A. (2014). Sense of Community and Community Participation: A Meta-Analytic Review. Social Indicators Research, 117(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0347-2

Tesfaye, Y., Roos, A., & Bohlin, F. (2012). Attitudes of local people towards collective action for forest management: the case of participatory forest management in Dodola area in the Bale Mountains, Southern Ethiopia. Biodiversity and conservation, 21(1), 245-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0181-2

Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. (2016). Group interaction as the crucible of social identity formation: A glimpse at the foundations of social identities for collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(2), 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215612217

Ullman, J. B. (2006). Structural Equation Modeling: Reviewing the Basics and Moving Forward. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_03

Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward A Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 271-360). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2

van Zomeren, M., Saguy, T., & Schellhaas, F. M. H. (2013). Believing in “making a difference” to collective efforts: Participative efficacy beliefs as a unique predictor of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(5), 618-634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212467476

Vecchione, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2009). Personality determinants of political participation: The contribution of traits and self-efficacy beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(4), 487-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.11.021

Velasquez, A., Montgomery, G., & Hall, J. A. (2019). Ethnic minorities’ social media political use: How ingroup identification, selective exposure, and collective efficacy shape social media political expression. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(4), 147-164.

Weiss, J. (2020). What Is Youth Political Participation? Literature Review on Youth Political Participation and Political Attitudes [Review]. Frontiers in Political Science, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2020.00001

Wilkins, D. J., Livingstone, A. G., & Levine, M. (2019). All click, no action? Online action, efficacy perceptions, and prior experience combine to affect future collective action. Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 97-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.007

Wray-Lake, L., DeHaan, C. R., Shubert, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2019). Examining links from civic engagement to daily well-being from a self-determination theory perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(2), 166-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1388432

Wuttke, A. (2020). Political engagement’s non-political roots: examining the role of basic psychological needs in the political domain. Motivation and Emotion, 44(1), 135-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09801-w


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4 ویزای استارتاپ

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.