Unwelcome mats: A decolonial intervention, challenging the refugee welcome narrative


Discourse surrounding the ‘refugee issue’, particularly within self-declared left-leaning, liberal movements, has often centred on the rhetoric of welcome. The narrative however has been adopted, reproduced and circulated without critically interrogating the framing by which such welcome is called upon. This article argues, rather than being inclusionary, the idea of welcome within the Australian context is in fact an exclusionary practice. Welcome as an extension of border imperialism. It explores the inherent paradoxes, assumptions and colonial undercurrents though a public intervention, Unwelcome Mats, commissioned as part of Melbourne Fringe Festival.  Unwelcome Mats was an intervention that saw  a series of welcome mats printed with the word ‘unwelcome’ and placed at buildings where the act of welcoming is and has been a point of contention, including the Immigration Museum, Old Parliament house and the Department of Citizenship and Border Protection.  Unwelcome Mats, instead of a one-dimensional welcome, sought to instead ask: who has the imperial, historical power to welcome?

DOI Code: 10.1285/i24212113v3i1p72

Keywords: decolonial, refugee, public intervention


Biko, S. (1978). I write what I like. London, UK: Heinemann.

Castro-Gomez, S. (2007). The missing chapter of empire. Cultural Studies, 21(2-3), 428-448.

Grosfoguel, R. (2008). Transmodernity, border thinking, and global coloniality. Eurozine. Retrieved from http://www.eurozine.com/transmodernity-border-thinking-and-global-coloniality/

Hage, G. (2000). White nation: Fantasies of white supremacy in a multicultural society. London, UK: Routledge.

Jeffers, A. (2012). Refugees, theatre and crisis: Performing global identities. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Martin-Baro, I. (1994). Writings for a Liberation Psychology. Cabridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Mignolo, W. (2009). Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and de-colonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7-8), 1-23. doi: 10.1177/0263276409349275

Mignolo, W. (2011). The darker side of western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Mignolo, W. (2013). Sensing otherwise: A story of an exhibition [online contemporary visual culture magazine]. Retrieved from http://www.ibraaz.org/projects/57/

Nyers, P. (2006). Rethinking refugees: Beyond states of emergency. New York, NY: Routledge.

Rotas, A. (2004) Is ‘Refugee Art’ Possible?. Third Text, 18(1), 51-60, doi: 10.1080/0952882032000182767

Sandoval, C. (2000). Methodology of the oppressed. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Tuck, E. (2000). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79 (3), 409-27. doi: 10.17763/haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15

Vázquez, R. (2014) Colonialidad y relacionalidad. In: Borsani, M.E. & Quintero, P. (Eds.), Los desafíos decoloniales de nuestros días: Pensar en colectivo (pp. 173–196). Neuquen, Argentina: EDUCO/Universidad Nacional de Comahuep.

Walia, H. (2013). Undoing border imperialism. Oakland, CA: AK Press.

Wynter, S. (2015). On being human as praxis. London, UK: Duke University Press.

Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.